Why not a Compression-Spark Ignition Hybrid?

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Nomen Nescio, May 9, 2006.

  1. Nomen Nescio

    Nomen Nescio Guest

    Instead of gas-electric hybrid with all its batteries to go bad, why not a
    diesel-gasoline hybrid? The diesel would get phenomenal mileage in city
    stop-and-go driving and the gas would provide power on the open road, also
    at great mileage. Gas engines are fairly efficient when they are up on the
    power curve; its the idling and part throttle operation where they suck
    gas.

    I do not propose two engines, one diesel and another gas. I suggest a true
    hybrid where one engine does both functions. Its so simple, an Einstein
    could do it. The main difference between a compression ignition and a
    spark ignition engine is the compression ratio. So, all you need to do is
    build a variable compression ratio engine. When in high compression, its a
    diesel and you inject fuel oil or corn syrup or whatever and when in low
    compression, you burn high BTU gasoline with a spark.

    Diesels run slower than modern gas engines, but that's no problem because
    they'll do 3600rpm any day of the week and that's fast enough for a high
    output when in the gas mode. They are also built heavier - that's a plus
    also, since they'll never break on you. What you need is a super simple
    method of variable compression. I think that could be done with a third
    valve located in the top of a hemispherical combustion chamber. When the
    computer says its time to switch from diesel to gas, the valve pops open to
    open a new combustion chamber. This lowers the compression instantly.
    Simultaneously, the computer directs the diesel injectors to turn off and
    activates the gas injectors. This switch would occur when 1. the car
    reaches high speed, high loads, 2. the car is low speed, high load, 3. you
    manually select which engine you want, 4. when one fuel supply is
    exhausted, it defaults to the other. This transition would be smooth,
    feeling just like an automatic transmission shift, no worse.

    Keep in mind, diesels are an alternative fuel engine, so this hybrid would
    really do what the President wants, to kick the Arab oil monopoly in the
    keister. Since this engine would burn either alternative fuel or high
    price gasoline, its our choice what we fuel it with - one, the other, or
    both. What can be more democratic than that? Economy or power; its our
    choice, not the government's. Its a win-win for the government, auto
    makers, and us in the order of importance to society.

    This is a multi-billion dollar idea and I donate it to the car industry
    today.
     
    Nomen Nescio, May 9, 2006
    #1
  2. Nomen Nescio

    frenchy Guest

    Filling it up with two different nozzles would be a pain, unless they
    made new ones with both nozzles together to fit into adjacent inlets on
    the car.
     
    frenchy, May 10, 2006
    #2
  3. It would also invite misfills.

    Ted
     
    Ted Mittelstaedt, May 10, 2006
    #3
  4. About 50 years ago my father had an International Harvester TD-9 tractor
    that started on gasoline then switched to diesel (but not automatically;
    ISTR there were two controls to operate) once it warmed up -- but
    accompanied by clouds of black smoke.

    So it's certainly not impossible, and now the changeover could no doubt
    be automated, as you suggest.

    But just yesterday I was thinking: "Why only gasoline/electric hybrids?
    What about diesel/electric hybrids?"

    Perce
     
    Percival P. Cassidy, May 10, 2006
    #4
  5. Nomen Nescio

    Steve Guest

    And nomen is still an idiot. If you've got a turbocharged diesel-cycle
    engine, there's NO reason to have it switch to a spark-ignition mode at
    any time. There's no advantage "on the open road" at all.

    Also, a diesel-cycle engine doesn't much care (combustion-wise, anyway)
    whether you're feeding it diesel, Jet-A, gasoline, or Wesson oil. The
    problem current automotive diesels have is that gasoline is too thin for
    their injection system to properly meter, and doesn't lubricate
    components in the fuel system that depend on the fact that diesel is a
    fairly good lubricant. There are military engines that have far more
    expensive injection systems that CAN burn anything, but its pretty
    cost-prohibitive for a PT Cruiser.
     
    Steve, May 10, 2006
    #5
  6. Nomen Nescio

    Richard Guest

    With direct fuel injection and a few other low cost modifications, a vehicle
    can have close to diesel fuel economy and still run on the fuel commonly
    avaliable in North America.

    Richard.
     
    Richard, May 10, 2006
    #6
  7. Nomen Nescio

    Robert Guest

    They already have this coming, in the way of GDI technology. It's gasoline,
    running at high compression, VERY fuel efficient, and no spark plugs.

    Diesel is dirty, requires very special post combustion treatment to make it
    clean (that's why no 2007 VW TDI in the US)
     
    Robert, May 11, 2006
    #7
  8. Nomen Nescio

    Joe Guest

    Yeah, those are neat. That was during the 6 volt era, and before glow plugs.
    Modern diesels aren't available like that anymore. They just pack lots of
    battery power and spin 'em over.

    I never actually had one, but I have heard that the plugs had a huge long
    electrode (extra extra exrta hot) but still fouled out after a while.
     
    Joe, May 11, 2006
    #8
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.