Why does PT foglight come on with right turn signal?

Recently when I put the RIGHT turn signal on, the foglight comes on. I
assume it comes on, because the instrument panel foglight indicator
comes on. Doesn't do it on a LEFT turn signal. Any ideas? I know how
to turn the foglights on and off. The handle is pushed in to the OFF
position, but signal for a right turn, and on comes the indicator
light. And maybe the fog lights.

 

The switch may be getting ready to go out. I have seen several instances
where the fog lites would not turn off even with the key out of the ignition
and run the battery down. Just a thought

Glenn Beasley
Chrysler Tech

 

++++++++++++++

Thanks Glenn, I just went out and checked. YES, when the turn signal
lever is ser for a right turn, the indicator light and the two fog
lights come on.
Can I have the fog lights disconnected, I've never used them one time,
or am I still cruisn'* for a new light switch.

*Pun intended, how much should I be prepared to spend to have the
switch replaced? If I need a light switch (PT has 45K on it) it just
further confirms my suspicion that PT means Piece (of) Trash!

 

You can disconnect them at the lites if you want. the switch is easy to
replace, just make sure you don't forget to put the old T/S relay into the
new switch if you do the job. Im not sure how much the switch is, maybe
$100? Me personally I think the PT Cruiser has been a very good reliable
vehicle.

Glenn

 

You're right Glenn. The PT is one of the better vehicles out there. We
are on our second one ('07 in Opal metalic w/ 5 speed stick) and we love
it. We put 131,000 miles on our first one and only replaced brakes and
tires.

 

The handle is pushed in to the OFF

Peter

Perhaps the ground for the signal lights and the fog lights is shared
and needs some help.

Bob AZ

 

That switch is a problem which a new one will only solve for a few years
until it goes again. A friend of mine had his fog lights occasionally
come on when he was parked and drain his battery.
I've read that many owners either pull the fog light fuse, or install a
separate fog light switch.

 

one of the better vehicles on the road i'll second that and cheaper to fix than
honda'sor toyotas
i see them with now 200 k and running good and still just needing brake jobs

 

I agree with the reliability and style of the PT, however, having had
a 2003 sedan and 2005 convertible, the gas mileage is mediocre. The
03 had the standard engine and did not get over 22 ever! The 05 had
the 180HP turbo and the best it could acheve was 24, once! We traded
it in two weeks ago for a 2007 Dodge Caliber and have been very
pleased with the car, getting over 26 city and on our first short
trip, 27, the car has less than 700 miles on it. I would like to have
seen the PT with the 2.0 engine and the CVT gearbox, or better, the
diesel that is sold in Europe.

 

I bought our 2006 PT Cruiser not for mpg but because it seemed like a
fairly safe car for my daughter to drive, could carry her entire dorm
room in the back with the seats removed, and was the right price point
for me. I do get grief from the Accord / Honda owners over how loud the
engine sounds and what they consider piss poor mpg (about 10 mpg less
than their rice wagons)

 

I agree with all that you say about the safety, the style, the
reliability, etc. The gas mileage was killing us: what with gas here
in South Florida at $3 and sometimes over, it was costing us $400 a
month just to commute 200 miles a week, not counting going to the
store or to eat locally. I am saying that the PT should have been
designed with an engine that gets better mileage to go with its great
looks. I also own a fully restored 1940 Chyrsler Royal coupe with
overdrive,and it can get 21 on the road with a 241.5 c.i. flathead
six. I would have purchased another PT if it would have had a
different engine/transmission combination.

 

|I bought our 2006 PT Cruiser not for mpg ....

I forgot to mention the first dealer I went to was pushing the new
Caliber at the time.. It didn't seem to be able to carry as much
"stuff" as the PT Cruiser would, but I was told my daughter would love
being seen in the Caliber and it had all this whiz bang neato stuff..
like the glove box cooler and drop down rear thumper speakers and lots
of cup holders and power outlets.. whoopee !

 

My wife and I had 2003 and 2005 PT's. We got a new Caliber SXT and
are loving it. You do not need to get the R/XT with all the bells and
whistles.

 

200 miles a week
x5 weeks in a long month
1000 miles
add in a couple hundred miles for the store and stuff

1200 miles
/15mpg if you drive like a maniac
80gals gas per month
X $3 a gallon
$240 for an absolute worst case month with a maniac driver.


You better buy a locking gas cap!

Steve B.

 

Save you money on the cap!!

Glenn Beasley
Chrysler Tech

 

Steve,
I am not complaining about the PT. However, what you didn't know is:
$500/month payment on the turbo PT, yea, my wife wanted her first
"expensive" car, gas running close to $400 bills a month, in South
Florida, you don't go anywhere without a car and gas is the most
expensive here in Palm Beach and Martin County, maybe because they
think that just because Tiger Woods lives on Jupiter Island, we all
can pay high prices. Last night, just to meet friends for a weekend,
we had to drive to South Broward, that was 70 miles one way,of course
we didn't have to do that. So, I hope that where you live, that a car
is not so important. As I stated, we really only have one car, the
antique has been around for a long time and is used for car shows and
our club hobby, only driven to shows and maybe for a Sunday drive.
So, when you add up my figures for the PT, it was getting close to
$900 a month just to drive the thing! Now with the Caliber, $141 a
month less, and our gas bill has been cut, so far in half. If the PT
Cruiser had that mileage and payment, I would still be driving one.

 

My point was that you are either driving a lot more than you said you
are or you had an issue with gas theft as there is no way you could
get a PT to use that much gas in so few miles.

I agree that mileage on a PT sucks. I drive a '95 Fleetwood for work
and regularly get better mileage than my friend gets out of their two
PT's. My car weighs twice as much and has an LT1 higher performance
350 in it so I just can't figure out what the heck a PT can do with
all that gas.

Steve B.

 

The only way to remove fuel from this vehicle would be to pop a hole in the
fuel tank or actuate the fuel pump with the line disconnected from the fuel
rail and pump it out. Just about every one( 2001 to present) of Chrysler
vehicles has a ping pong type roll over ball in the bottom of the fuel
inlet. This ball is used to seat the fuel tank and prevent fuel from
spilling out in case of a vehicle rollover. A siphon hose will not get past
this ball and into the tank to remove the fuel
Just a thought

Glenn

 

Steve,
We seem to be getting into agreement here on the fact that the gas
mileage on the PT sucks big time. There was no gas theft, and the
mileage I stated that we drove was correct. The 180hp turbo Touring
Edition was supposed to get better than the 150hp standard that I had
in my 2003, but did not! I drove a 1949 Chrysler with a 135hp
straight eight and got better mileage! I, and many others on PT
forums cannot understand how the car will just not get the gas
mileage. I realize that it is an "emotional" buy and not one for pure
mileage, but come on! A 2.4 four cylinder that cannot get better than
22! Just refilled my Caliber today, got 28.115mpg, now that is
getting some good mileage! I used and am using Mobil One synthetic
oil in all my cars, except the 1940, and even used the K & N air
filter in the PT's because I read that it did increase the mileage by
a little bit, which it surprisingly did, but not much. I had a 1992
Lincoln Continental V-6 that would get 30 mpg on the road and 24 in
town, so something is very wrong here.

 

All I know is that both of our PT's had 5 speed sticks in them and both
ALWAYS get 30 to 31 MPG with mostly highway miles (which is how my wife
uses it for going to work). It doesn't matter if the A/C is on or not.
Even city driving only drops it to the to high 20's. We don't have a
turbo, just the standard 2.4 and 5 speed. I'm seeing something about 15
mpg ??? I don't believe that. Even the 21 mpg sounds wrong, or else
something is wrong with the engine or someone has a lead right foot.
I have an old '94 Plymouth Acclaim that I use for back and forth to work
.. It has the 2.4 and auto and even that thing gets around 28 mpg in
mixed driving.