Who's Number Three?

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer, Sep 28, 2003.

  1. Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer

    David Little Guest

    We HAVE to buy non-domestic products. It is the only way we can export our
    inflation and keep it hidden from the American public.

    I know that seems like a brash statement; when you don't stop to think about
    before you flame it. However, if not for the money we spend on overseas
    production, all money would be spent internally in the US and the buying
    power would be destroyed by the resulting inflation.
     
    David Little, Oct 1, 2003
    #21
  2. Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer

    Rick Blaine Guest

    Isn't Canada foreign?

    Don't know. You know what we consider American cars in Canada? Domestic.
    Go figure.
     
    Rick Blaine, Oct 1, 2003
    #22
  3. Foreign? No, not if it's southern Ontario...

    DAS
     
    Dori Schmetterling, Oct 1, 2003
    #23
  4. Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer

    Dan Gates Guest

    This stems from the old Auto Pact. We used to have a real, local auto
    industry (early in the previous century). As I understand it, the Auto
    Pact, between the US and Canada, allowed the US auto companies to sell
    vehicles in Canada, duty free, as long as they made one vehicle in
    Canada for every one they sold. This meant that they could, for
    instance, sell a New Yorker as long as they made a Caravan. For a
    while, in the good old days (like the late '70s I think), productivity
    at Canadian plants was such that more vehicles were made in Canada than
    were sold.

    Now they are closing plants left and right. As an aside, I would have
    thought that the number of Firebats and Camaros that are bought by
    Froncophone Studs would be enough to keep the St. Therese plant open.

    Dan
     
    Dan Gates, Oct 1, 2003
    #24
  5. Do you have a source for that philosophy? I've read a few articles dealing
    with trade and economic issues and this is one angle I have not stumbled
    before.

    | We HAVE to buy non-domestic products. It is the only way we can export
    our
    | inflation and keep it hidden from the American public.
    |
    | I know that seems like a brash statement; when you don't stop to think
    about
    | before you flame it. However, if not for the money we spend on overseas
    | production, all money would be spent internally in the US and the buying
    | power would be destroyed by the resulting inflation.
    |
    | | >
    | > | > | So you take issue with all the Republicans, who still treat companies
    | that
    | > | move their HQ to Bermuda or Aruba to avoid paying US taxes? They
    still
    | > want
    | > | those companies to be treated as American when it comes to giving them
    | > | contracts.
    | >
    | > The US government buys from anybody...case in point...a Chinese company
    | now
    | > making the Army berets and a scandavian company making their grenades.
    I
    | > wish they wouldn't do that and that includes companies that relocate
    | outside
    | > of US borders. Of course, if the companies are taxed so high that they
    | > can't compete internationally that they have to move or die, then that
    is
    | a
    | > issue also that needs to be fixed.
    | >
    | >
    |
    |
     
    James C. Reeves, Oct 3, 2003
    #25
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.