Unleaded petrol mixed with Diesel in a Chrysler 2.5CRD

Being a "redneck" isn't regional. Jersey-ites can be just as redneck as
anyone else.... and in fact a lot of 'em are really good at it.

 

My only recollection of a Peugeot diesel was back in the early 1970's
when Peugeot tried to introduce their deisel cars to the U.S. A guy I
was stationed with ended up getting a full refund on the vehicle after
they could not solve some serious problems with the engine (design
issues, or the U.S. dealer mechanics not knowing how to work on diesels?
- however Mercedes didn't have that problem with their diesels in the
U.S. that I know of). Peugeot's effort was a disaster - they bought
lots of them back and abandoned the effort before the second MY IIRC (or
possibly midway in to the 2nd year).

Bill Putney
(To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with the letter 'x')

 

Huw, you're sharp enough to know that as an engineer myself, I was
talking about REASONABLE contingencies! Mixing fuels inadvertently (or
even unbeknownst to the driver) is a REASONABLE contingency.

What's "modern" about a truck pulling up to a station and connecting
hoses? The method hasn't changed in 2 generations. Maybe it SHOULD, but
it hasn't yet.

 

I see you haven't been brainwashed by liberals. In liberal circles,
"redneck" implies southern, and ignorant people don't exist above the
Mason Dixon line.

Bill Putney
(To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with the letter 'x')

 

I figure its just European envy again. ;-)

Actually I don't even own one of the darn things, but I think they're a
very intersting and successful car in the same way the MINI is an
interesting and successful car (I guess I could rub it in that the MINI
is powered by a Chrysler-designed engine...). They're certainly not for
everyone, and that's fine. If you want my vote for the ugliest waste of
sheetmetal and plastic to curse the highways in recent years, I'd vote
for the Honda Element or the Scion XB, both of which narrowly displaced
the Aztek and Avalanche for bottom dishonors in my book. But those fugly
boxes have their own loyal following as well. To each his own!

 

I'll bet there are a lot of folks that would love an update in a year,
then 2 and 3 to see how long that pump lasts....

Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
Aug./05 http://www.imagestation.com/album/index.html?id=2120343242
(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)

 

Someone being in "liberal circles" implies that they're made of brick
from the neck up anyway, so what do I care what they think?

I get great amusement from how liberalism claims to be the enlightened,
unbiased, non-jugemental, "tolerant" political philosophy, yet begins
immediately pigeonholing everyone according to the most insulting
stereotypes imagineable. "From the south? Inbred, toothless, uneducated
deluded fools." "From Texas? Shoot-first-ask-later cowboy menality."
"From the midwest? Poor deluded unenlightened red-stater." And God
forbid you be a conservative and an ethnic minority, because well, "you
just CAN'T naturally believe that way! You've been bought and paid for
and made a tool of the right-wing conspiracy!"

 

*ahem* Conservatives do that, too.

"From New England? Toffeenosed, paternalistic nanny-statist."

 

The point is that I have seen little support for the PT Cruiser from
anybody. Personally I don't that much care for its appearance, though I am
told it is actually quite practical. Quite a few to be seen in London. One
of my acquaintances here in London claims to really like its retro looks...
but he is still driving his Saab...

I agree that there are other cars that vie for the ugliness prize.

DAS

For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling

 

What, you mean these are not accurate descriptions...?

DAS

For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling

 

EVERYONE does it to a degree, no matter how hard we try not to. It
strikes me as funny because (some) liberals are so loud about how
they'd NEVER do something like that.

 

I don't know how long the PT has been available in Europe, but its kinda
run its course over here. There was another minor flurry of interest
when they brought out the turbo PT and the convertible, but nothing like
the H-bomb that the first year of production set off. They sold SCADS of
them. To say that it was a big success for Chrysler is an
understatement. People either loved or hated them, and PLENTY loved them
enough to buy one. Some Chrysler fans thought they drew too much
influence from 30s Fords, but most people saw the 40's Chrysler T&C as
the main source of inspiration. But there are so many now that it
doesn't really engender any strong feelings when someone says they don't
like them. Besides, the real PT fanatics don't hang out on r.a.m.c.
anyway. They've got their own playpen somewhere on usenet.... ;-)

 

And the new-for-2006 facelift is just...sad.

"inflated" headlamps
Clear-lens rear directional indicators, instead of amber
Reshaped reversing lamps

It looks like a Chinese knockoff of itself.

 

Well, anybody except the market.

 

Who gives a s**t what it looks like as long as if handles well, doesn't
rust and has a reasonably reliable and poky engine.

Appearance comes right at the bottom IMO when buying a mode of transport...

 

I'm not familiar with OK, but at least here (MD) our safety is so
stringent you will probably end up paying more than $300 on the repairs
your car "needs" to pass inspection to be legally registered. Yeah,
it's a racket, but whaddayagonnado. Point is, any car that someone's
willing to sell for $300 will probably end up scrapped, as nobody wants
to take the chance of buying themselves more problems than they already
had. You buy a $300 car, next thing you know it won't pass inspection
and the bastard zoning inspector is giving you x amount of days to get
rid of the "junk" car in your driveway that doesn't have plates on it
or they're going to fine you etc. etc. etc... now you're out $300 plus
$70 or whatever the inspection costs these days plus whatever you put
into it trying to fix it up for inspection and then the junkman pays
you $50 and hauls it away.

nate

 

wrote:

[...]

Nope.

[1] Fire

[2] Police

[3] Ambulance

[4] Coast Guard

[5] Cave Rescue

[6] ...

It pissed me (and the 999 ops) off no end when th AA claimed to be "The
4th Emergency Service", fine though they are.





A

 

So maybe the RAC really ***ARE*** the 4th emergency service ?

A similar argument could be put forward for utility companies -
they`re only allowed orange flashing lights, but when all the lights
go out including the telephone exchange for the police switchboard...

 

RNLI?

 

The message <>

Doctors are allowed green flashing lights - there's posh!