Tran fluid confusion.

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Bruce Yelen, Aug 19, 2003.

  1. Bruce Yelen

    Bruce Yelen Guest

    I have three Chrysler vehicles. The vehicles (and owner's manual recomended
    tran fluid) are:

    1994 Dakota - Mopar ATF
    2000 Grand Caravan - Mopar ATF+3
    2003 Jeep Liberty - Mopar ATF+4

    Now the questions:

    The stores have ATF+, and ATF+3. What should I "feed" the various tranny's?
    Do I have to pay premium price at the dealer to get ATF+4 for the Jeep?

    Is there some allowable fluid that is good for all 3 vehicles so I don't
    have to stock multiple varieties?

    Oh for the days when you only had to worry about DexronII and Type F (grin)!
     
    Bruce Yelen, Aug 19, 2003
    #1
  2. Bruce Yelen

    jdoe Guest

    YOu can use +4 anywhere the others were spec'd. You cannot use +, +3, etc.
    when +4 is spec'd. So one fluid would be +4.
    Larry
     
    jdoe, Aug 19, 2003
    #2
  3. Bruce Yelen

    Steve Guest


    Feed them all ATF+4. Its backward-compatible, and the best fluid. Last I
    checked, the dealer price on ATF+4 was about the same as Quaker State or
    Chevron ATF+3 at Pep Boys. QS, Chevron, and others will also eventually
    start selling (heck, may already sell) ATF+4 spec fluid, so you might
    keep checking if its inconvenient to go to the dealer.
    Its easier now. Use ATF +(highest number) in EVERYTHING Chrysler.
     
    Steve, Aug 19, 2003
    #3
  4. Richard, you are partially correct. My 2001 minivan has ATF+4

    This is per ALLPAR:

    ATF+4 is recommended for all Chrysler transmissions (except as noted
    below) except 1999 and earlier minivans. (TSB 21-06-01) You can use
    ATF+3 with all Chrysler transmissions (except as noted below).
    An important exception for Jeep owners
    Danny noted: "The Jeep AW-4 (Aisin-Warner) transmission should use
    Dexron III. Pennzoil's ATF+3 phamphlet says it is good for "1988 and
    newer..<snip>..All Jeep models without AW-4 automatic transmissions".
    See the Pennzoil document (PDF). We believe, based on Robert A.'s
    note, that the AW-4 transmission was used as late as 1999 (possibly
    later!) with the 4.0 liter engine.

    Dennis Williamson wrote that Chrysler 7176 / ATF+3 fluid is no longer
    the only fluid to use in a late model transmission. Chrysler TSB#
    21-16-99 lists the current vehicles that only use ATF+4 type 9602,
    part 05013457AA (for quart bottles). The vehicles that use this fluid
    include:

    Starting Model Year Car Built After
    1999 Prowler 7-20-98
    2000 Neon 4-24-99
    2000 Minivans (11th letter of VIN=R) 10-10-99
    2000 Minivans (11th letter of VIN=B) 10-18-99
    1999 Concorde, Intrepid, LHS, 300M 7-20-98
    2000 Sebring convertible 5-21-99
    1999 Cirrus, Stratus, Breeze 9-7-98
    2000 All Others 10-18-99

    Robert Alderson, a Chrysler transmission tech with gold certification,
    noted that 2000 and newer vehicles use 9606 (ATF+4) fluid.
     
    Richard Benner Jr, Aug 21, 2003
    #4
  5. Bruce Yelen

    Neil Nelson Guest

    The caution over using +4 in older transmissions was in
    regard to the TCC not properly burnishing.
    Since your interests are in changing the fluid on a vehicle
    that has already accumulated mileage, the TCC -is- already
    burnished. +4 will work fine.

    All spelled out in the TSB.
     
    Neil Nelson, Aug 21, 2003
    #5
  6. Bruce Yelen

    robert Guest

    You are totally right...people are reading the tsb wrong...I have a
    1999 dodge grand caravan and am using ATF+4. I have 106,000 on
    it...the tsb only warns you if you have rebuilt a tranny that you may
    have a problem of shudder during break in...well after 106,000 I think
    that mine is broke in already. I was told by the dealer that aft+4 is
    also used for the power steering fluid now...
     
    robert, Aug 21, 2003
    #6
  7. Bruce Yelen

    Richard Guest

    You may be accurate but I did call Chrysler's Tech people and they told me
    that ATF+4 was not recommend in my 96 Town and Country under any
    circumstances. That is how I read the TSB; but perhaps it has been revised.

    Richard.
     
    Richard, Aug 21, 2003
    #7
  8. Bruce Yelen

    robert Guest

    well I also called them before I used atf+4 and they told me what I
    stated in my previous reply. I have over 30,000 woth atf+4 and no
    trouble at all.
     
    robert, Aug 22, 2003
    #8
  9. Bruce Yelen

    Steve Guest

    I'm venturing into the realm of foggy memory here, but I *think* that
    when ATF+4 first appeared, the advice was "don't use it in ANYTHING that
    originally required ATF+3." The clarification that it was indeed
    backward-compatible and could fully supersede ATF+3 in all applications
    came out later, and was in essence a reversal of the first recommendation.
     
    Steve, Aug 22, 2003
    #9
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.