torqueflite 727 problem, need help....please. Long, sorry.

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by cjboater, Sep 26, 2006.

  1. cjboater

    John Kunkel Guest

    Absolutely wrong!!!

    Adjusting the cable/linkage so that the transmission lever is full back at
    WOT most often results in late part throttle upshifts or no WOT upshifts.
    When properly adjusted the lever will be NEAR full back but there will be
    some travel left.

    The "optimal" setting is one that suits the individual driver. As long as
    the transmission will kickdown at WOT at a road speed of 40 mph or so, the
    adjustment is sufficient to prevent any low pressure associated damage.
     
    John Kunkel, Sep 28, 2006
    #21
  2. cjboater

    DeserTBoB Guest

    OK, Superior I've seen out here. Could they be marketing different
    names regionally?
    That's the one, seen oft times in T-buckets with a '53-'55 Cadillac
    transplanted into it.
    So, it would seem, with a TV adjustment, he's home free.
     
    DeserTBoB, Sep 28, 2006
    #22
  3. cjboater

    DeserTBoB Guest

    So he says. Charlie Nudo, aka "duty-honor-country," is the troll who
    trailed me in here. And, FYI, I've rebuild two 727s myself. How many
    has Nudo even touched? Zero.

    The rear clutch check ball thing came to mind, because I had the same
    problem with a Road Runner I got on the cheap with a "blown" trans.
    What happened was that the check ball was just plain missing, and the
    rear band was fried. Everything else, including all hard parts, were
    in great shape, so it was an easy job. I used an ATP master kit on
    that one, and was later told I'd screwed up by using their stuff,
    although I sold the car and never got a comeback on the trans. One
    shop owner told me that ATP seals weren't up to par, but yet others
    say their stuff's perfectly reliable. I used some seal repair items
    on a Ford C6 that held up for over 100K miles, so....

    Any opinions on that?
     
    DeserTBoB, Sep 28, 2006
    #23
  4. cjboater

    DeserTBoB Guest

    So the FSM is wrong, then.
     
    DeserTBoB, Sep 28, 2006
    #24
  5. cjboater

    John Kunkel Guest

    Please reference ANY Mopar shop manual that specifies the lever must be full
    back at WOT, include year, page, paragraph.

    What you will actually find is that EVERY FSM specifies the adjustment be
    made with the carb/throttle body at warm curb idle and with the transmission
    lever full FORWARD. When correctly adjusted at idle the position of the
    transmission lever at WOT will automatically be correct due to the design of
    the factory linkage/cable system.
     
    John Kunkel, Sep 28, 2006
    #25
  6. cjboater

    DeserTBoB Guest

    That's exactly what my FSM says for the overtravel rod system for '86,
    and a recheck showed that this will also put the TV fully in at WOT,
    at least on my application. I can shinny underneath and recheck it,
    but that's how it worked out last time I set it.
     
    DeserTBoB, Sep 29, 2006
    #26
  7. cjboater

    sqdancerLynn Guest

    Since you have a custom install I would look for a different throdle lever
    (the one on the trans) I have seen them in different lengths depending on
    application. Another thought Has it been converted to carb? You need the
    correct mopar adapter lever for the carb. Front band & rear bands seldom
    wear out on 727 So that wouldn't be a problem unless overtightened. The
    quickest way to distroy a TF is to leave the throdle pressure linnkage
    disconnected I had the MP deep pan on mine with street shift kit
     
    sqdancerLynn, Sep 29, 2006
    #27
  8. John,

    John,

    Check this out- DeserTroll is now trying to say a TH350 only came on a
    Chevy- this goes far to show his total LACK of automotive knowledge- as
    it was a common transmission on Buick, Olds, Pontiac as well, from the
    1960's all the way into the 1980's

    Here's his latest post:

    http://groups.google.com/group/alt....246be/bbde7085682b61bf?hl=en#bbde7085682b61bf


    And here's the obvious info that totally DISPROVES what he's saying. I
    must have seen 100's of TH350's in Buick-Olds-Pontiac cars. I parted
    out many myself, and my Firebird still has the original TH350 it came
    with in 1970.

    http://www.novak-adapt.com/knowledge/th350.htm

    Engine Compatibility and Adaptability
    GM
    The front face TH350 is natively compatible with either the Chevrolet
    90 degree "Small Block" & "Big Block" patterned engines,
    including the V6, V8, I6 & Iron Duke I4. Another version, the Buick /
    Oldsmobile / Pontiac (BOP) TH350 will be compatible with the Buick 90
    degree V6 & V8 engines, and the Olds & Pontiac 90 degree V8. This
    "BOP" version features a "valley" at the twelve o'clock
    position of the block flange where the peak would be on the Chevy
    (pictured) version.


    THIS IS WHY YOU CAN'T BELIEVE ANYTHING DESERTBOB TELLS YOU- he's a
    poser.
     
    duty-honor-country, Sep 29, 2006
    #28
  9. You already saw pictures of the engine, with your picture on the
    manifold- here it is again, you ricer.

    http://i9.tinypic.com/3022e5i.jpg


    Also, the Chevrolet THM350 does NOT fit the Pontiac
    WRONG- I still have the owner's manual for my car, it says right in it,
    TH350

    The TH375 was a TH350 with a LONG TAILSHAFT, used in full sized luxury
    cars- you DUMB ASS.

    Explain this:

    http://www.off-road.com/jeep/tech/convtrans/gm/gmth350id.html

    Bolt Pattern
    The Turbo 350 case commonly comes with three different bolt patterns.
    Some cases have a Chevy engine bolt pattern, some cases have the Buick,

    Olds, Pontiac, and Caddy bolt pattern, and some have both. It is well
    worth getting the dual pattern, or unicase, Turbo 350. If you ever
    think you might do an engine swap, you won't have to worry about the
    transmission. It will also help the resale of the transmission because
    it will work with more engine combinations.

    The Buick, Olds, Pontiac, and Caddy engine bolt pattern is easily
    identified by the valley at the top and the Chevy pattern is peaked on
    the top. The dual pattern transmission in the picture on the right has
    both patterns. You can see the valley and peak. Each set of bolts
    around the top is in a pair. The alignment pin and the lower bolt is
    the same.

    IT'S DAMN OBVIOUS- DESERTBOB NEVER OWNED A GM V-8 POWERED CAR- HE KNOWS
    SHIT ABOUT THE MOST COMMON TRANSMISSION GM EVER MADE ALL THROUGH THE
    1970'S !
     
    duty-honor-country, Sep 29, 2006
    #29
  10. You accused Bob being obsessive and yet you take the time to Photoshop
    his picture, print it out and put in on someones engine. You are the
    psycho and this proves it.
     
    Charlie Deludo, Sep 29, 2006
    #30
  11. Why no pics of the whole car? Too ashamed? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
     
    Charlie Deludo, Sep 29, 2006
    #31
  12. previous erased posts by "bicycle" aka "deludo"- which he removed
    because he writes checks his body can't cash- he's NOTHING

    http://i9.tinypic.com/2dwezqb.jpg

    http://i9.tinypic.com/4getp1s.jpg
     
    duty-honor-country, Sep 29, 2006
    #32
  13. previous erased posts by "bicycle" aka "deludo"- which he removed

    att: all- to read above pics, open it, put your mouse arrow on the
    picture, a box will appear at lower right, click on that box to enlarge
    and read what lowlife welfare trash "deludo" aka "bicycle" wrote

    email me at for more info on the coward

    don't worry- he's NOTHING
     
    duty-honor-country, Sep 29, 2006
    #33


  14. http://i10.tinypic.com/4e0vcb5.jpg

    like bicycle aka deludo will ever own something this nice...

    never ! he prefers rice !
     
    duty-honor-country, Sep 29, 2006
    #34
  15. cjboater

    DeserTBoB Guest

    Charlie Nudo doesn't know a THM375 from a THM375B from a THM350.
    Everyone at GM wound up with a permutation of the cheesy THM350 later
    on, but not so in the beginning. So much for his claims of being an
    "automotive expert" and a 12 year "shop owner!" If he even had a
    shop, it was closed due to poor repairs and slovenly work, no doubt.
    See:



    For those not able to use that link, use:

    http://groups.google.com/group/alt.collecting.8-track-tapes/msg/44231df3215eb5d8?dmode=source

    Go ahead, Noodles...worm your way out of this one!
     
    DeserTBoB, Sep 29, 2006
    #35
  16. You accused Bob being obsessive and yet you take the time to Photoshop
    and you took the time to put up these posts, about sneaking into my
    gated community and sneaking around my house- then you deleted them
    after you talked to the cops and they said they'd arrest you
    what about that ?? now, who's the psycho ??

    bicycle aka deludo aka white trash aka (dozens of other usernames)

    anyone interested in finding out more about bicycle the cowardly net
    stalker, email me at

    I'll gladly forward to anyone ALL the incriminating files I have on
    "bicycle"

    don't worry, he's NOTHING
     
    duty-honor-country, Sep 29, 2006
    #36
  17. cjboater

    DeserTBoB Guest

    The rust lobsters on that tin can must be huge. Nudo's pic here shows
    ONE thing...sloppy work and a really fucked up induction system.
     
    DeserTBoB, Sep 29, 2006
    #37
  18. cjboater

    DeserTBoB Guest

    A '70 455? Came from the factory with a THM400. Plus, looking at
    this pic (which you probably stole elsewhere on the net, which can be
    checked by looking at the JPEG coding) I do not believe that this is
    the same car.
     
    DeserTBoB, Sep 29, 2006
    #38
  19. just like the Chrysler manual was wrong, right Boob ?

    Pontiac, Buick, and Olds used the TH350 on all their base-line GM
    A-bodies, that means Cutlass-Skylark-F85-Tempest-LeMans-from 1968 all
    the way to 1980

    also in all base-line Camaros and Firebirds 1968 to 1981

    where the HELL have you been ?

    The TH350 in my car is ORIGINAL EQUIPMENT

    this scan directly from Chiltons 1964-71 repair manual

    http://i9.tinypic.com/2z7eefa.jpg

    you are one stupid, dumb-ass liberal idiot

    obviously you never owned or worked on a GM V-8 powered car at ALL, it
    was their most common automatic of the 1970's

    you DICK !
     
    duty-honor-country, Sep 29, 2006
    #39

  20. we're still waiting to see DeserTBob's 1978 Honda and 1986 Chrysler...

    they must be really "nice", smelling that is...

    and look like a family a doberman dogs were living in them both...

    BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA !!
     
    duty-honor-country, Sep 29, 2006
    #40
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.