The Drive-a-Toyota Act

ROFLMAO.

You're the one who can't get it together to type correctly, spell, or
use the spell-checker you freely admit is integral to your email client.

You're the one who repeatedly fails to acknowledge the role of a VIP
parent in expunging (an issue you chose to focus on) the cocaine arrest
record of a national figure.

And I'm the one with the 'busted brain'?

Right. Whatever version of reality suits. Probably several per day.

Give yourself a chance. At least use the spell checker.

 

So the Republicans have realized they have no chance of winning the
next election, to the point that they aren't even thinking about it. Best
news I've heard all day!

Ted

 

Look for Junior to try and declare martial law. (They've laid enough
groundwork that's for sure).

 

Diesel is only "more expensive" in some areas because of Supply and Demand.
They don't make as much diesel so they can jack the price up, even though
it costs far less to produce.

In any case, take a look at diesel from coal.

Though I should learn more, from what I've read, we've got enough to last
the next 50 years or more without even bothering to import if we switched
some percentage of our cars/trucks to diesel and utilize our coal reserves.

 

Nah - it's a Republican trick. The more we let the Democrats talk
freely and publicly, the more they embarrass themselves and the more
people vote Republican. People like Gore (carbon credits/global warming
scams) and Sharpton (Duke University), and even the serious candidates,
are our biggest help. And we appreciate the help from you guys here too.

Bill Putney
(To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with the letter 'x')

 

LOL, the mumblings of a guy being led to the gallows.

 

Yeah. If another windbag is making more unfounded wild accusations to make a buck, it must be
true!

Geez.

 

Interesting that when you don't really have any points or anything interesting /
factual to write, all you can fall back on is your pedantic grammar policing.

 

Aha. like O'Really, Havenotty, Limpdick, or Ann Bee-atch Coulter?

 

Gosh and I thought that such outstanding people like the Gores are so much
better than those damned other people. Now when they get in a jam, you just
point to the people you claimed not to respect as a proper example.

 

OP's point was proper spelling, which was handily refuted.

OP notably refused to reply to Dubya's VIP arrest record being expunged,
which was previously refuted. Which OP has not challenged.

Your point was what, exactly?

 

Which might even be interesting if there were credible sources to back up
your lousy assertions. Instead the best we can get from you is somebody
trying to hawk a B rack book years ago. But go ahead, feel free to change
the discussion to your spelling bee contest.

 

How did these names get introduced into the discussion? Which accusations are you claiming are
equivalent? Please explain. And if you do not like them, why introduce a B book author that you
yourself equate to these others?

 

Once again, OP changed the debate.

Feel free to try to refute the expunged VIP arrest record.

 

Just pointing out your circular arguments and your need to be a spelling policeman in
lieu of an actual argument. When called on it, you actually equate the people you
argue against to the people you support. But have a great day anyway!

 

O'Really, Havenotty, Limpdick, or Ann Bee-atch Coulter define the
concept of "unfounded wild accusations".

 

If you are still babbling about George W Bush, there is no credible, supported
evidence to back your wild assertions. Your 'feel free' statement is a nice
example of a begging the question fallacy.

 

Let us know when you figure out logic.

 

Your "credible, supported evidence" otherwise, is what?

 

*Where* is this defined? And even if these were actually horrible people, why do you bring them to
equate them to the author you were using for the basis of your claims?

(Nice example of a begging the question fallacy again, however.