The Drive-a-Toyota Act

Correct, it is integrated, and you know it, and yet you don't use it.

Which brands you as careless and ignorant, as well as a wingnut.

BTW, you're still absolutely sure Dubya had nothing expunged?

What about that expunged record story you didn't respond to?

You know, the one that goes like this:

"Oct. 18, 1999 | A new book by Texas author J.H. Hatfield claims that
George W. Bush was arrested for cocaine possession in 1972, but had his
record expunged ..."

Oops. Busted. Again.

That's logic for you.

 

If it wasn't for an unfortunate encouter with a '76 MonteCarlo, It might
even be on the rod...

Sigh... I miss that car. Simple, elegant, handling was very precise and
it had a nervous engine, even for a car from that era. Those things were
nicely built, and way better than newer junk

If I could find one in a not-so-bad shape (I live in Canada), It might
be a really nice project to rebuild one...

 

Go back and start over. Perhaps if you do it slowing you will be able to
follow.

 

I don't follow your grammar.

Bill Putney
(To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with the letter 'x')

 

Yes. So what.

There's that faulty logic again. You can't get past it.

You're not worth the time.

Where did I say that? Oh that's right - I didn't.

What about it. What about Gore's son?

Oh - yeah - really busted.

Yeah whatever.

Bill Putney
(To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with the letter 'x')

 

The problem isn't sentence structure.

 

Keep working it Bill, keep working it! Since neither of them is going
to be on the 2008 ticket, and Hillary isn't going to be nominated for
President (VP is most likely) you can keep yourself amused shooting
at 10 year old memories while the rest of the country pays attention to
the folks actually on the ticket. (hint, you have to actually be running to
have a chance at being elected to the Presidency)

Ted

 

Really? They better get a special prosecutor right on that shit. I'd say
spend as much taxpayer's money as needed to get to the bottom of it too.
Leave no stone unturned, no matter where it takes him. I don't care if they
don't find anything and spen 40 million.

I know of a guy over at Pepperdine that has some experience in Wild-ass
Goose Chases that would be just right for the job. Name's Ken Starr. ;-)

 

He can't handle the truth! ;-)

 

Ha. You're already fully invested.

Oh, no?

"Guess they don't understand the difference between people getting
convicted and it showing up on their record and the info. being expunged
tru polititcal power (actually they do understand, but their "job" is to
divert attention and obfuscate)."

[Note signature Putney-esque spelling mistakes included.]

"There you go again...."
- R. Reagan (probably one of your faves)

Can't stand the truth?

You aren't alone. Dubya, too.

More like, whatever version of the truth suits you.

 

I think I understand what Bill is getting at. If you start a
conversation about alleged special treatment for *one* son of a wealthy
and well connected person, its 'dishonest' to bring up the *proven*
special treatment of the son of *another* well connected person.
Throwing George Soros into the discussion however, is perfectly logical
and honest.

 

?? I wasn't even thinking of this in the context of an election.

Bill Putney
(To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with the letter 'x')

 

That's pretty rich (pun intended) - the Soros crowd even being able to
utter the word "truth". (BTW - look up the word grammmar so you
understand what all it entails. Hint - it ain't just sentence structure.)

Bill Putney
(To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with the letter 'x')

 

There were no mistakes - "Putney-esque" or otherwise. Unless you mean
"thru", which is an accepted spelling of "through" in informal
communictaions *AND* in formal engineering drawings (i.e, always
"THRU-HOLE", never "THROUGH-HOLE"). Regardless - intentional (and in
this case, acceptable) spelling of the word.

You write and "think" a lot like DesertBob - I suspect that's who you are.

Bill Putney
(To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with the letter 'x')

 

In spite of your intended sarcasm, you're absoutely right. I prefer to
discuss things in the present day together. The Soros blogs and Gore
III drug/carbon credits events are present day.

Bill Putney
(To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with the letter 'x')

 

Why don't you guys take your political commentary to a more appropriate
newsgroup?

Bob

 

When "tru polititcal" (see above and in prior posts) is accepted usage,
you're right.

Until then... busted.

And that's all I have to say about that....

 

What it meant in this instance was that typing "slowing" instead of
"slower" (which of course you understood) gave you a chance to avoid the
suggestion and punt.

 

LOL, tranlation: Like most rightwingnuts you insist on making the rules,
or *changing* them after the damage is tallied up.

I don't want to play in your yard,
I don't like you anymore,
You'll be sorry when you see me,
Sliding down our cellar door,
You can't holler down our rainbarrel,
You can't climb our apple tree,
I don't want to play in your yard,
If you won't be good to me.

 

No - that's what "News" (busted brain guy) does when I make a typo.

Bill Putney
(To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with the letter 'x')