Strong SUV sales

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Nomen Nescio, Dec 29, 2007.

  1. Nomen Nescio

    Rich Guest

    How long is your bike ride to work?

    Cheers,

    Rich
     
    Rich, Dec 31, 2007
    #21
  2. Nomen Nescio

    Ed White Guest

    What part of "majority of people" and "most of the time" was unclear?
    Clearly people have different needs. I certainly can understand that a large
    family might need a larger vehicle than a Corolla. But how many families
    "need" a 7 or 8 passenger SUV? On the other hand, I would never think it was
    reasonable for me to tell you (or anyone else) what to buy. As I also said -
    "If your goal is to tell me what I should buy, then I think you should move
    to another country."

    Ed
     
    Ed White, Dec 31, 2007
    #22
  3. Nomen Nescio

    Siskuwihane Guest

    There is no "rush hour" where I live. Many who live within walking
    distance of work are driving. In such a small town you know who's
    driving what, where they work and how many people they have in their
    family. I can count on one hand the number of people who "need" such a
    vehicle and it isn't the bank president whose only child is grown and
    on her own.
     
    Siskuwihane, Dec 31, 2007
    #23
  4. Maybe the bank president has grandchildren. If so, how is he supposed
    to pick them all up at the airport when they come to visit? Or maybe
    he helps out with "Meals on wheels" on the weekend. Who are you to
    judge what people "need" in a vehicle? Looks more like jealousy and
    sour grapes to me.
     
    Professor1942, Dec 31, 2007
    #24
  5. Nomen Nescio

    Harley Guest

    To dang far. That's why I drive my Silverado V8. ;-)
     
    Harley, Dec 31, 2007
    #25
  6. Nomen Nescio

    Rich Guest

    I don't see how you can make an assessment like that.

    Please explain how you gained this knowledge of the majority of people
    most of the time.
    And yet you've decided that a corolla would meet most people's needs.
    My Honda Accord works, but it's a bit cramped. I drive it to and from work
    alone however.
    I don't think SUVs seat that many. You need a van.
    Odd, I was under the distinct impression that you already had.
    This seemed to disagree with the rest of the post.

    Cheers,

    Rich
     
    Rich, Dec 31, 2007
    #26
  7. Nomen Nescio

    Siskuwihane Guest

    Just so I have this straight, I shouldn't be judging anyone but you
    are telling me
    I am jealous and suffering from sour grapes? Ok, now that the pot
    calling the kettle black is out of the way...

    I've lived next door to him for the last 18 years so I have a very
    good idea of what he delivers (or rather doesn't) etc. If I can afford
    to live in his neighborhood then I can well afford to drive what he's
    driving but I do not to let my ego sway the choices I make.
     
    Siskuwihane, Dec 31, 2007
    #27
  8. Nomen Nescio

    Ed White Guest

    LOL - You obviously saw how I made it....whether you agree with it or not.
    Even you can figure this out by watching traffic. What percentage of cars do
    you see carrying more than 2 people? I am positive that even you would
    agree the number is less than 50%.
    You are ignoring the context of the original statement .But I think I am
    safe when I say that a Corolla would meet the transportation needs of most
    people most of the times. Now whether it would meet their other needs (ego
    primarily) I can't say. Clearly lots of people (including me) justify buying
    other vehicles. I think Corollas are ugly, slow, ride poorly, and are
    uncomfortable, but I am pretty sure they would get me where I need to go.
    Don't confuse needs with wishes, wants, and desires. I am sure that Corollas
    don't meet the wishes, wants, or desires of most people (even some people
    who buy them).
    Expedition, Suburban, Sequoia, Explorer, Tahoe, and many others all have
    seats for 7 or more.
    I never said you should buy a Corolla, I just said "anything larger / more
    powerful than a Corolla is unnecessary most of the time."
    No, you didn't read the original post in context, then you started cherry
    picking parts of the post to nit pick, and finally you implied I said things
    I never said (i.e. - I never said you should buy a Corolla or any other
    particular vehicle). My point was (perhaps poorly made) was that it is
    unfair to attack SUV owners based on whether or not they actually need an
    SUV. Most people buy vehicles that far exceed what they actually need. If
    you are going to pick on SUV owners, you should also pick on most other
    vehicle buyers.

    Ed
     
    Ed White, Dec 31, 2007
    #28
  9. Alright, fair enough. Rich people tend to overdo a lot of things
    (fancy French meals that aren't filling, useless ornaments and
    fountains, etc.), but most SUV owners I know have large families so
    there is nothing excessive or unnecessary about it.
     
    Professor1942, Dec 31, 2007
    #29
  10. Nomen Nescio

    Rich Guest

    In what others ways is he living his life not to your satisfaction?

    And how do you suggest remedying this? I suggest that the first
    thing you will have to do is shitcan what's left of the Constitution.
    Don't worry about that, Congress is almost done.

    What then?

    Cheers,

    Rich
     
    Rich, Dec 31, 2007
    #30
  11. I own a 2003 Corolla and it's an excellent commuter car. Terrible
    family car though (which is why we also have something bigger).
     
    Professor1942, Dec 31, 2007
    #31
  12. Nomen Nescio

    Fran Guest


    [liberals'; feigned]

    Personally, I believe much of the discourse around SUV use has little
    to do with GHG emissions.

    To begin with, I'm not sure that SUVs on the whole actually emit
    greater quantities of GHGs than other vehicles of simlar engine
    capacity and functionality. In Australia, friendlier tax treatment
    borne of a the desire of conservative governments to keep rural
    constituents happy has led to widespread use of these distinctive
    vehicles in urban settings, which use many think inapproriate.

    People use them in urban settings for a variety of reasons, at least
    some of which seem specious. They are widely seen as safer (at least
    for occupants) though the higher centres of gravity of some models and
    their use by relatively inexperienced drivers has led to higher
    insurance premiums on some models. They've been associated with
    reversinbg injuries -- typically toddlers and small children being run
    over in suburban driveways. They also tend to obstruct through vision
    -- trying to turn right when one is on your left or vice versa can be
    difficult.

    Like most things, car purchase is often a lifestyle or identity
    statement. These vehicles are often marketed in ways that underline
    irresponsible or borderline taboo behaviour -- running over wildlife
    or cattle and tearing up the wilderness -- in one ad, someone tries to
    pull out a stump and inadvertently rips out a tree in Japan, neatly
    underlining popular perceptions -- too much power and too little
    responsibility. Accordingly the vehicles are seen as driven by people
    who are potentially irresponsible, road rage candidates or
    environmental vandals. And because the more expensive of the vehicles
    tend to be driven by upmarket buyers, the idea of these things being
    an extension of the rich man's castle onto the roads (his tank?) their
    appearance does provoke widespread animus. If you've ever tried to
    negotiate a busy shopping centre car park during the peak and seen how
    many large SUVs are parked illegally on the ends of aisles, you won't
    have to think too hard to work out what dozens fo frustrated drivers
    are saying as they squeeze past.

    My own view is that people should avoid car use wherever practicable,
    and that adequate provision should be made to make that an easy choice
    to make in urban settings much of the time. One should choose cars
    that are modest, fuel efficient, relatively safe tfor all and serve
    your needs adequately and leave a small footprint. If that's an SUV-
    style vehicle, so be it.

    Fran
     
    Fran, Dec 31, 2007
    #32
  13. I am in the "walk everywhere I go unless I get a ride from someone" club
    currently and am trying to get a '95 Caravan so I can safely say that
    walking sux. In the summer it isn't so bad and can even be fun sometimes
    except for trying to get $50 worth of groceries home from Aldi in a double
    stroller. Right now I hate it because we (SE Iowa) just got another 6" of
    snow and I had to walk in the street to the grocery store because most
    sidewalks including mine aren't cleaned off. I felt like I had walked twice
    as far after the trip as I really did because my feet slid backwards a
    little with every step. Yes all cars are a luxury but they are one luxury
    that is starting to look mighty fine to me right now d:). BTW as I typed
    this a POS H2 went by.
     
    Daniel Who Wants to Know, Dec 31, 2007
    #33
  14. Nomen Nescio

    Rich Guest

    The number of stupid and unnecessary vehicles is pretty large. Is anything
    stupider and more unnecessary than a LS460h or a Rolls Royce? Or how about
    200 mph motorcycles? Could anything be stupider? For a majority of people
    anything larger / more powerful than a Corolla is unnecessary most of the
    time. Trying to draw a line between reasonable and unreasonable vehicles is
    a pretty hard thing to do. If your goal is to tell me what I should buy,
    then I think you should move to another country.

    I see some claims, I don't see any data or supporting evidence.
    During rush hour, not many including myself.
    I'm unclear on the validity of extrapolating my limited observations to
    everywhere, everybody and everwhen. My rush hour observations are denied
    by my driving the rest of time anyway.
    It lacked any meaningful content, at least IMHO.
    How many families in the US?
    You mean you don't drive a corolla? :)
    By that metric, so would a cooper mini (which I expect would be faster).
    As you say, the smaller SUVs won't, but I've never shopped for one or
    looked closely.
    So it's just a utilitarian argument (the value of which is not settled)?
    I responded to most of it.
    You mean when I said "Odd, I was under the distinct impression that you
    already had"? That statement was properly qualified, if you did not read
    it closely.
    Hold on one minute, who's picking on SUV owners here? :)

    Cheers,

    Rich
     
    Rich, Dec 31, 2007
    #34
  15. Nomen Nescio

    Siskuwihane Guest

    Son of a gun, I never even thought that he might be having French food
    too.
    That greedy bastard. ;)
     
    Siskuwihane, Dec 31, 2007
    #35
  16. Well, every "fine dining" experience I've had recently has involved a
    trip to Wendy's afterwards, which causes more global warming.
     
    Professor1942, Jan 1, 2008
    #36
  17. Nomen Nescio

    Bill Putney Guest

    Ahh - good catch.
    British/Aussie spelling of 'centers' - OK
    British/Aussie spelling of 'behavior' - OK
    [for]

    All in fun. I could say I was too lazy to look up 'feigned', but in
    reality I was too ignorant to realize I didn't know its proper spelling.
    I ain't no ignorant sombitch.

    Bill Putney
    (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
    address with the letter 'x')
     
    Bill Putney, Jan 1, 2008
    #37
  18. Nomen Nescio

    Peter Franks Guest

    Is property ownership based on need?
     
    Peter Franks, Jan 1, 2008
    #38
  19. Nomen Nescio

    Fran Guest

    Not a fan of Shakepseare?

    |||
    Blow, Blow, thou winter wind!
    Thou art not so unkind
    As man's ingratitude
    Thy tooth is not so keen
    Because thou art not seen.
    Although thy breath be rude.
    Heigh ho! sing, heigh ho! unto the green holly;
    Most friendship is feigning most loving mere folly.
    Then, heigh ho, the holly!
    This life is most jolly.
    |||

    From *As You Like It*, IIRC

    Fran
     
    Fran, Jan 1, 2008
    #39
  20. Nomen Nescio

    Fran Guest

    Ooops ...


    Shakespeare ... better ...
     
    Fran, Jan 1, 2008
    #40
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.