Slow conversion to synth oil; 1988 2.2 turbo II

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by billccm, May 18, 2007.

  1. billccm

    billccm Guest

    Hello All:

    Let me preface this with I have always been a proponent of frequent
    oil changes with conventional motor oil vs extended change intervals
    with synthetic oil. I keep my cars a long time, and have always
    changed the oil at 2K (no, not 3K ) mile intervals. I use plain Jane
    Valvoline, and try to stock up cases of the stuff when there are
    rebates that equate to $0.89/quart.

    I work with an AMSOIL distributor, and am convinced that 0w30 is
    probably the right thing to do for the Lancer Shelby. I bought this
    car new, and currently at 82K miles it has had only 10w30 conventional
    Valvoline changes at 2K intervals when it was a daily driver, now down
    to once a year at around 500 mile intervals.

    I have mentioned that switching to synth oil this late in the game
    will cause massive oil "hemorrhaging" everywhere. My trusty AMSOIL
    distributor recommended perhaps a slow conversion, using one quart of
    0w30 with three quarts of conventional on my next change, then 50-50,
    then full 0w30. He commented that "AMSOIL does not recommend this, due
    to the fact that you cannot use extended drain periods, but otherwise
    it is not a problem."

    So, my LeBaron, and Impala will continue with the conventional oil and
    2K intervals, but the once a year Lancer may get a synth conversion.

    OPINIONS, PLEASE! Let's hear it all!

    Thanks for your time in replying, and have a nice day,

    Bill
     
    billccm, May 18, 2007
    #1
  2. billccm

    Sharon Cooke Guest

    Switching to synthetic oil doesn't really CAUSE oil leaks, merely
    exposes failing gaskets that were "good enough" for conventional oil
    that has larger and non-uniform molecule sizes compared to synthetic.
    I've switched several (used) vehicles to synthetic at near-100K miles
    with zero oil leakage other than at points where the gaskets were
    already suspect (oil-soaked, weeping). No weaning required.
     
    Sharon Cooke, May 18, 2007
    #2
  3. billccm

    Beryl Guest

    Leaks... I wasn't thinking about that when I started reading this. I'd
    be concerned about the possibility of old sludge accumulations breaking
    free and blocking oil passages.

    I did a sudden switch to Mobil 1 with a Toyota 4 cyl. 22R in its later
    life, and very soon after that it started having recurring episodes of
    low oil pressure accompanied by loud engine ticking.
    I think that I usually used "waxy" Pennzoil before the switch, and this
    Lancer's engine may be cleaner than mine was, but I wouldn't take the
    gamble.
     
    Beryl, May 18, 2007
    #3
  4. billccm

    Bill Putney Guest

    I agree with Beryl. Anyone who tells you there is no risk in switching
    over at high mileage is flat out wrong regardless of how many times they
    may have done it successfully. It may work fine, but there is
    definitely risk. I don't know what the statistics are, but there are
    definite risks.

    I switched a turbo'd Subaru over (from Castrol to Cstrol Syntec) at 180k
    miles and had to switch back. The valve clatter didn't stop until I
    took measures to get the lifters cleaned out from whatever got into them
    and either stuck the pistons or interfered with the check valves.

    Bill Putney
    (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
    address with the letter 'x')
     
    Bill Putney, May 18, 2007
    #4
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.