Skid Plate Protection Needed on Passenger Cars

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Nomen Nescio, Aug 28, 2005.

  1. Nomen Nescio

    Nomen Nescio Guest

    Low slung cars are excellent on smooth roads, but are susceptable to damage
    to their under carriages under certain conditions occassionally
    encountered.

    Particularly, when there is a small radius dip, driveway, holes in the
    road, on unimproved roads and in the dark when road obstacles cannot be
    seen. If the clearance is not enough, the oil pan, frame members, steering
    linkages, or rear axle can be damaged. This damage is expensive and or
    creates safety problems from the damage inflicted.

    Chrysler must address this problem by shielding the underside of the car in
    all critical areas. Usually, it requires a curved steel plate that will
    ride up and over these common road obstructions. The plate does not need
    to be so heavy as to prevent damage to itself; it can sacrifice itself in a
    hard impact to protect vital components under the car.

    Bash plates or skid plates are easily designed, fabricated and fitted. You
    should see these items on next year's models. If they are not adopted in
    this timely manner, I see liability exposure to the car maker to road
    clearance damages which occur in the future, given prior knowledge of the
    problem and its cure.
     
    Nomen Nescio, Aug 28, 2005
    #1
  2. Nomen Nescio

    Guest Guest


    Off road vehicles already have them - and generally on standard
    passenger cars they would be needless extra weight and would
    contribute to engine overheating if the rest of the design was not
    changed to take the sheilds into account.
    All cars sold in North America MUST have a minimum ground clearance.
    If that is not adequate, the LAW should be changed making more
    clearance mandatory. Right !!!. That will never happen.
    Ever hear of driving to suit conditions???
     
    Guest, Aug 28, 2005
    #2
  3. Nomen Nescio

    Bill Putney Guest

    That would be fine if we are willing to sacrifice performance and fuel
    milage and generally increased repair bills for the additional labor to
    remove and re-install the shields for the simplest undercarriage
    maintenance.

    Compare the total initial cost of the shield on millions of cars to the
    total cost of avoided damage to a very small percentage of the vehicles,
    and I think you'll come up with a huge net expense to the buying public
    (even before factoring in extra fuel cost and general maintenance cost
    increases of having to deal with a freakin' shield before any work can
    be done). Costs for routine maintenance and the simplest of repairs is
    ridiculous enough as it is.

    Bill Putney
    (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
    address with the letter 'x')
     
    Bill Putney, Aug 28, 2005
    #3
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.