rust protection?

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Ken Weitzel, Sep 1, 2006.

  1. Ken Weitzel

    Ken Weitzel Guest

    Hi...

    Just about to get the rust check people to treat my car,
    when I came across a potentially interesting ad in this
    week's Canadian Tire flyer.

    Product is called "Counteract", on sale for 199 Canadian,
    and claims to "cover your car with an electrical charge,
    to prevent and inhibit rust"

    Maker claims it's been around for 20 years, so wonder if
    any of you might have any experience with it? Or even
    opinions?

    Thanks, and take care.

    Ken
     
    Ken Weitzel, Sep 1, 2006
    #1
  2. Ken Weitzel

    maxpower Guest

    Chrysler has 10Y/100K mile warranty. Me personally, its a waste of money and
    in some cases undercoating/rustproofing may cause more damage in the long
    run,

    My opinion

    Glenn Beasley
    Chrysler Tech
     
    maxpower, Sep 1, 2006
    #2
  3. Ken Weitzel

    Ed Guest

    I agree. I have a '97 Dodge Caravan with 200+ thousand kilometers on it.

    It's never been rustproofed or undercoated and there's not a speck of rust
    on it.

    Ed
     
    Ed, Sep 1, 2006
    #3
  4. Ken Weitzel

    Ken Weitzel Guest

    Hi Glenn...

    Think I've misled you; not unusual for me nowadays :)

    No warranty left, got a 94 lhs that's every bit as good as
    brand new. In fact if I showed it to you, and IF you couldn't
    recognize the year I betcha I could have you believing it was
    only a year or two old. (except for the sun roof, which doesn't
    close in the right position, which will be another story)

    Rust check isn't undercoating; it's stuff (looks like thick oil)
    that they spray everywhere. Drill small holes in everything
    and spray it in. then plug the holes. Costs about 150 bucks,
    and should be re-done every year. It works well.

    The other thing I just noticed in the canadian tire flier is
    totally electronic, and I can't decide whether it pie in the
    sky or worthwhile. Seeing I can't properly describe it, here's
    a link:
    Lemme know what you think..

    Thanks, and take care.

    Ken
     
    Ken Weitzel, Sep 1, 2006
    #4
  5. Ken Weitzel

    DeserTBoB Guest

    Not just your opinion, but Consumer's Union's opinion some years back,
    as well. They, being locating up in the Rust Belt of upstate Noo
    Yawk, were already innately familiar with "car cancer" and did some
    surveys of cars that had various "rust proofing" treatments. It was
    bad news for the big Midwest-based chain rustproofer at the time,
    Ziebart. CU said that there was actually more "rot" on floor pans and
    in B pillars on Ziebart treated cars because the drain and weep holes
    in such cars were routinely clogged with their spray-on material. The
    cars that had the least amount of rust damage were those 1.) without
    "undercoating" 2.) parked in unheated garages and 3.) the owner would
    flush the underside of the car regularly or have it washed at a car
    wash with "undercarriage jets."

    Your money, your car....a Chrysler pro and CU can't be wrong! I do
    have a friend up in Noo Hampstah who used to spray the underside of
    his VW diesel with used motor oil twice or three times a season (QUITE
    illegal, really) and never had a rust problem in 11 years. In that
    state, that's saying something!
     
    DeserTBoB, Sep 1, 2006
    #5
  6. I had a 1951 Studebaker that had some surface rust here and there on the
    bottom. There had been an oil leak in the past, which left its mark in
    the form of caked on greasy dirt. Under that, the car was in like-new
    condition. Oil leaks have some benefits, apparently.
     
    Robbie and Laura Reynolds, Sep 1, 2006
    #6
  7. Ken Weitzel

    Some O Guest

    I used a spray on grease on a '63 Chev II. Worked great, but a bit
    messy on long grass until it hardens a bit.
    for a last 10 years all I do is spray a bit of WD40 into the door drain
    holes every few years. I drive in very road salty conditions to the ski
    hills.

    I just noticed the first rust on my '95 Concord, along the weld of the
    left rear door bottom. Since this is not the worst door bottom exposure
    I expect some build problem. I'll clean it off and apply some rust
    sealer, then touch up.
     
    Some O, Sep 1, 2006
    #7
  8. Ken Weitzel

    DeserTBoB Guest

    Lube oil leaks do, but ATF, being mineral based, is more soluable in
    water and doesn't seem to help as much in that regard. Stinks worse
    when hot, too. Someday, I'll learn not to get that stuff in my hair
    when I do transmission service.
     
    DeserTBoB, Sep 1, 2006
    #8
  9. The best rust protector believe it or not, is motor oil. Back in the
    1960-70's, there were a few local body shops and garages performing the
    service, before the waste oil laws became really strict. They would
    put your car on a lift, and coat the entire bottom of the car with a
    fine mist of motor oil. After driving it a few days, a fine layer of
    dust would be stuck to that oil. It will never rust. These garages
    had a regular schedule and people would come in yearly or every 2 years
    for the service.

    If you take a look at some really older cars like 1950-60's models,
    you'll see the driveshaft/transmission tunnel and center crossmember
    are never rusted out. That's because the oil that blows back off the
    engine coats that area continuously. But they would rust along the
    floor sides, where the oil doesn't reach.

    It works.

    The problem with an "undercoating" is, it eventually dries and
    chips/flakes off.

    For a complete restoration, the best thing to use is a 2-part epoxy.
    First the frame and underbody must be sandlbasted to bare metal, or
    dipped in a stripper tank. Then it is primed with self-etching zinc
    primer, then the 2-part epoxy which contains a hardener just like glue.
    The result is bombproof and will outlive the car's owner.
     
    duty-honor-country, Sep 1, 2006
    #9
  10. Ken Weitzel

    David Guest

    Re electronic protection - it was put into some modern holdens here in
    Australia snd was a constant low voltage device. As far as how successful it
    was I do not know.
    Lushy
     
    David, Sep 3, 2006
    #10
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.