remote entry -key fob programming

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by John Keith, Jan 7, 2008.

  1. John Keith

    maxpower Guest

    Keep in mind that when you program one remote on this system you have to
    program all at the same time. Or it wipes out the ones that you didnt
    program.

    You were able to do your older vehicles because it was not using the rolling
    code system I would think. when program a key fob into that year you didnt
    have to have all of them to reprogram. You were able to add one
    I beleive the key fobs were designed more to lock and unlock doors
    easier.... not to deter thiefs. The skim key is to deter thiefs from
    stealing the vehicle. and the vehicle theft alarm was to deter them
     
    maxpower, Jan 14, 2008
    #21
  2. John Keith

    John Keith Guest

    maxpower, there is nothing in this description that would preclude
    This is the OP checking in. I've been following the discussion and I'm
    now at the point where I'm not sure I want to try the process for fear
    of ending up with no fob that works! My fobs do have identical Part #
    and FCC ID # for what that's worth (the vehciles were 1999 and 2000).
    And the process described in the owners manual gives the steps to
    program a different fob to work with the car but is silent about
    having to apply the process to the existing fob. I can't afford to
    have the dealer fix anything I screw up. Maybe I'll just continue
    using the low-tech key when I have to use my wife's car :)


    John Keith
     
    John Keith, Jan 15, 2008
    #22
  3. Understandable, the problem is that this ALSO applies to things such
    as the human interface to the engine computer.

    Why does it take a $10,000 scantool to interrogate the computer?
    Car computers today could be fitted with an USB port and you
    just plug in the laptop and run some software on it that interrogates the
    computer. Or better yet as I've said before, put an ethernet port
    on the car computer and put a webserver in it, and jack in your
    laptop running a web browser and use that to interrogate the
    computer.
    Systems like the car computer interface which would cost almost
    zero due to amortization, yet deliver massive benefits, are not
    implemented. Systems like powered running boards that do
    nothing other than make the vehicle look like a rolling Christmas
    tree, ARE implemented. Is it any surprise Chrysler is this close
    to bankruptcy?

    Ted
     
    Ted Mittelstaedt, Jan 15, 2008
    #23
  4. John Keith

    Bill Putney Guest

    That's been available for years - I own a third party tool that plugs
    into the car's datalink connector and adapts to the USB port of a
    computer (typically a laptop) into which you load the tool's software
    (basically your computer and the software comprise the "tool").

    Bill Putney
    (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
    address with the letter 'x')
     
    Bill Putney, Jan 15, 2008
    #24
  5. Yes, I know about those tools but that isn't what I'm talking about.
    The CPUs today used for embedded electronics like a vehicle car
    computer have plenty of extra power and the entire software that is
    in the tool could be easily stuck into the car computer - thus turning
    your laptop into nothing more than a human interface device, and alleviating
    the need to buy the software and the adapter that goes from the
    datalink connector to the USB port (which if you were to take it
    apart you probably would find quite a lot of intelligence in the adapter)

    Remember, the software on the computer needs to read lots of
    different models of cars, so it's much larger than it would need to
    be if included in the car computer.

    The federal government standardized the OBD-II connector over
    a decade ago, today there's much more common computer industry
    standard interfaces - ie: USB, firewire, and ethernet - where the
    controllers for these interfaces are much cheaper due to the fact
    that they aren't single-sourced. It's high time that the OBD-II
    interface be retired and replaced with one of these so you can just
    use an off-the-shelf $5 cable to plug your PC into the car computer.

    Ted
     
    Ted Mittelstaedt, Jan 16, 2008
    #25
  6. No, in the older vehicles you have to program all the fobs in at the same
    time also. But the programming method is different, it involves grounding a
    wire and pushing buttons on the fobs, none of this business of requiring 2
    working fobs beforehand. When I did it, I programmed the first vehicle
    then the second vehicle.

    The older system only allows a max of 2 fobs to be programmed.

    I'm also pretty sure it's a rolling key system, but I think it's a standard
    PRNG algorithm for all of the fobs.

    Ted
     
    Ted Mittelstaedt, Jan 16, 2008
    #26
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.