"Recent" Minivan Transmission Performance? Opinions wanted --

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Jon, Apr 6, 2007.

  1. Jon

    Jon Guest

    I've got a good friend who's looking at used minivans, particularly
    those falling under the DC umbrella....since they are generally
    thousands less in price compared to the premium Asian brands, and
    still more affordable than other domestic brands. Realistically,
    we're looking at machines around 100K or so in mileage...

    Now, once upon a time, we used to make ourselves feel better about our
    gambles by saying hell, if it did just find for 100K, it's got to have
    some life left in it....and if you were wrong it was a $250 automatic
    transmission rebuild or a few bills slipped to the parts yard.....but
    now he's shopping for primary transportation for his wife and kids
    that is far more sophisticated and expensive to repair if you have a
    major breakdown. Historically, Chrysler has had some reliability
    issues with its automatic transmissions used in the minivans...not to
    mention other deficiencies. My question is: with specific regard to
    the transmission, is there a model year that he needs to clear to
    avoid the aformentioned transmission woes, or is it an ongoing
    problem?

    Many thanks to those who take the time to reply,

    Jon
     
    Jon, Apr 6, 2007
    #1
  2. Jon

    who Guest

    Since about '95 the Chrysler 4sp auto used in the Vans and also the 3.3L
    LH cars has been OK up to at least 200K kms if serviced properly.
    So IMO the key is getting a Van that has been properly serviced.
     
    who, Apr 6, 2007
    #2
  3. Jon

    kmatheson Guest

    I believe that this is correct. I don't think there were any design
    changes after 1995. These are the things that I have gleaned from over
    the years:

    1. Change the fluid regularly, and use the correct fluid. ATF+4 for
    2000 and later models, and ATF+3 for 1999 and earlier. The bulletin
    regarding ATF+4 excluded 1999 and earlier minivans, but no one seems
    to understand why. Several have used ATF+4 in 1999 and earlier models
    without a problem.

    2. If you pull a trailer, follow the directions in the owner's manual,
    and stick to the limits regarding weight. A transmission cooler is
    also recommend.

    3. If you do need service, Take it to a shop that uses the correct
    fluid, has the correct scan tool(s), and other diagnostic equipment.
    Don't settle for a "road test" only diagnosis.

    My father took his low-mileage, great condition Dodge Dynasty to a
    shop because the transmission wasn't shifting correctly. The guy took
    it on a "road test" and told him that the transmission was "shot" and
    would need a rebuild. He then offered to buy it on the spot, to which
    my father agreed. I think that the guy figured that it was a probably
    a solenoid pack, or some other easy repair, so he ended up getting a
    great car for a low price.

    Of course, I didn't find out until after the fact.

    -KM
     
    kmatheson, Apr 6, 2007
    #3
  4. Jon

    Steve Guest

    Some hardware changes- for example the 41TE has now been modified with
    another planetary set to make it a 6-speed in certain applications, like
    the 4-liter powered Pacifica. And there have been quite a few software
    changes, too even for the 4-speed version. Since the engines are now
    throttle-by-wire, one huge HUGE change that improves transmission
    longevity is that the computer closes the throttle during shifts so that
    the clutch packs no longer have to dissipate the power being produced by
    the engine during the shift. It feels and sounds a little odd when you
    first drive one of these newer drivetrains after driving an older one,
    but the difference is significant. It almost sounds like a manual
    transmission being "powershifted"- you hear the engine throttle back,
    the transmission very very quickly moves to the next gear, and then the
    throttle opens again. It should greatly reduce stress on the
    transmission, and unlike a lot of implementations (coughGMchoke)
    Chrysler's close-the-throttle-during-shifts actually improves
    driveability. The shifts that result are extremely smooth- you hear
    rather than feel them.

    ATF+3 may have been one of the bigggest problems all along. It has
    poorer stability and oxidation resistance than Dexron or even old Type F
    fluid. ATF +4 is THE way to go now- its a better fluid in EVERY way than
    +3, and even has better basic stability than Dexron III and Mercon V
     
    Steve, Apr 9, 2007
    #4
  5. Jon

    Jon Guest

    Many thanks for your responses, if he's hell bent on buying Chrysler,
    I'll steer him towards these generations and try to make sure he digs
    up some service records.

    Happy Trails,

    Jon
     
    Jon, Apr 10, 2007
    #5
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.