Rated miles per gallon is total BS!

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by TOM KAN PA, Oct 27, 2004.

Page 2 of 2
  1. TOM KAN PA

    Peter W. Oelerich Guest

    I have a very similar experience. My Wife drives a 2002 Chrysler Voyager
    3.3 and local
    driving never attains better than 15MPG. On the highway I am doing much
    better
    with a MPG of about 23. I have had the vehicle to the Dealer 3 times and
    each time
    I list fuel economy as an issue and they have yet to find anything wrong.
    Other than
    this I am very happy with the vehicle.

    Additionally I drive a 2004 Chrysler PtCruiser, non-turbo automatic and I
    get a solid 21
    MPG local since new.
     
    Peter W. Oelerich, Apr 21, 2005
    #21
  2. TOM KAN PA

    mic canic Guest

    my big question to u is. do u use the overhead console to figure mileage ???
    if u do it only can make a average calculation and not a dead nut on figure
     
    mic canic, Apr 23, 2005
    #22
Page 2 of 2
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.
Similar Threads

  1. What is "initial quality" as per the commercials?

  2. "Trail Rated" What is it

  3. "Trail Rated" Jeep 4x4 -- Please define

  4. Gas $1.55 gallon in China, so why do we pay more?

  5. $5 gallon gas wont't stop worlds most thirsty SUV

  6. High specificity of oils, coolannts poor design per se

  7. Above $4/gallon, it won't matter anymore

  8. Total Appeal

Loading...