Problem With Power Outlet

I've been "on" this list for several years - and I know Max can be
ornery. It's a case of "don't confuse me with facts, my mind's already
made up"

Like your god? president, he appears to believe it doesn't matter HOW
wrong you are, as long as you are sincere. Sincerity is the hard part.
Once you've got everybody fooled on that score, you've got it made.

 

You previously refused to believe that the charge voltage in many cars

I've read the OP quite a few times, and that info is not in there. That
might be why I've ignored that bit of info....

Again, incorrect, as the OP never says this.



--
Max

"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)

 

Boy - was THAT a Fruedian slip, or what. Was supposed to read your
GOOD? president!!!!!!!

 

Once you've got everybody fooled on that score, you've got it made.

Maybe you all ought to go back whence you came, since your tactic of trying
to fool at least three of us who've had more experience in the field that
you book types isn't working.


Oh, and take Tbone with you. Then y'all can have fun foolin' each other,
because its not working on those of us who know better.

--
Max

"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)

 

First of all, I'm not the "book type" I've been a licenced mechanic
since 1971, and have made my living as a mechanic for many years.
Electrical diagnosis was one of my specialties, and I did work for
quite a few local shops who brought their problems to me, because I
could solve them.Ten years of my career I was service manager, as well
as diagnostician, spending a minimum of a few hours a day on the
bench.
I have also built and driven a relatively successful electric vehicle,
and have done board level diagnosis and repairs on computers. I am NOT
an engineer, nor do I play one on TV.

 

The problem is MAX that YOU are the only one that thinks you know better.
The rest of us know you to be the fool you are, especially in this as well
as the DC thread.

 

The problem is MAX that YOU are the only one that thinks you know better.

Have you got a rebuttal to my facts yet? If not, crawl back under the rock
and hit the net. BTW, all that you deny is readily available from DCX's own
site.

--
Max

"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)

 

I believa all that you claim, since IIRC, you were the one that suggested a
load test using accessories and the plugged in equipment.

Its still a load test that needs to be done first. That facts are all there
in the first post.

--
Max

"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)

 

LOL, I replied to both of your silly responses, go look it up. Most of your
"facts" don't have a damn thing to do with the takeover since they are all
from around 2003 and up and the takeover happened in 98. DCX's own biased
web site also makes it clear that ALL stockholders meeting happen in
Germany. So much for a merger of "equals", LOL!!!

 

LOL, I replied to both of your silly responses, go look it up. Most of

I saw your reply. It paralleled the gem quality reply you gave about having
power, but not being powered. It lacked facts, rebuttal, and any relevant
info. Simply put, you denied the info because it was more current than the
actual date of the merger. Fact is, the original comment was made regarding
the present status of the company, thus my comments dealt with the current
status of the company. You have yet to refute the current status of the
company in any manner but to deny its statments on its own website.

--
Max

"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)

 

You guys are studs for still posted in this thread. I don't see how you've
kept it up, honestly.

 

More attempted sleight-of-hand. It wasn't in the original post (OP)- it
was in a subsequent post by the OP (orignial poster). Nice try at
confusing people with the dual meaning of the acronym 'OP". So now that
you know you've been wexposed on that point, go ahead and try to tell me
that it wasn't in any post by the OP (original poster). The proof in
your utter dishonesty is that the text from the post has been quoted for
you more than once, and you continue to try to obfuscate that with your
little OP = original poster and OP = original post trick.

Bill Putney
(To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with the letter 'x')

 

Ok - we see that now you've developed multiple personalities, because
you're the only one being fooled.

Not the first time I've run into a person who is jealous of "college
boys", even if said college boys have the practical experience too. I
find that truly competent mechanics don't have diploma envy and can hold
their own in any technical discussion.

So which one of your personalities typed that?

Bill Putney
(To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with the letter 'x')

 

Nobody gives a **** about your anal retentive personal disagreements with
this other guy. How about you just give it a rest, or take your bullshit
to email, wouldja?

 

Shut the **** up and take your personal bullshit disagreements with the
other idiots here to email. Nobody here is interested.

 

More attempted sleight-of-hand. It wasn't in the original post (OP)- it

Ok.... here ya go....

Engine off, inverter goes off.

Engine off, inverter goes off.

Engine off, inverter goes off.

Enggine off, inverter goes off.

Ok, so now that I've quoted in context FOUR posts from the OP, all within
the first day of this thread, where he clearly says that the inverter shuts
down when the engine is not running, What have you got to say? In each post,
his last line of the first paragraph says, if the engine is off, the
inverter goes off. Its plain english, with which you claim to be well
trained.

Its not me that is being dishonest here, junior.

--
Max

"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)

 

So noted.

 

Never was an issue.

Never was an issue.

Never was an issue.

Never was an issue.

Never was an issue.

The issue was that the inverter shut off *with* *the* *engine*
*running*, not that it shut off with the engine not running. I never
said that the inverter didn't shut down with the engine off. The issue
was that the inverter actually shut off with the engine running.

9:53 p.m. also on the first day of posting:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt....ler+author:Neil&rnum=1&hl=en#129c946e95dcf4a3

In each post,

Except that what you were taking issue with was that I said the inverter
cut off with the engine running. There was never any issue over it
cutting off with the engine off. Your mind is flip-flopping.

Not so. You changed it into an argument about something that I never
said. Inverter cut off with engine off - never disagreed. It did cut
off with the engine running, which is what you argued with previously.

Bill Putney
(To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with the letter 'x')

 

<snip>

Say, Bill?

The pig's enjoyin' it.

I'm just sayin'.

 

Understood. Thanks!

Bill Putney
(To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with the letter 'x')