Obama Favors Bankruptcy for GM, Chrysler

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Jim Higgins, Mar 30, 2009.

  1. Jim Higgins

    Jim Higgins Guest

    Obama Favors Bankruptcy for GM, Chrysler
    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123841609048669495.html

    WASHINGTON— The Obama's administration's leading plan to fix General
    Motors Corp. and Chrysler LLC would use bankruptcy filings to purge the
    ailing companies of their biggest problems, including bondholder debt
    and retiree health-care costs, according to people familiar with the matter.

    The move would in essence split both companies into their "good" and
    "bad" components. The government would like to see the "good" GM to be a
    standalone company, according to an administration official. The "good"
    Chrysler would be sold to Fiat SpA, assuming that deal is completed,
    this person said.

    GM and Chrysler have had bankruptcy attorneys devising plans for such a
    move in recent months.

    President Barack Obama's task force has told both companies that the
    administration prefers this route as a way to reorganize the two auto
    makers, rather than the prolonged out-of-court process that has thus far
    frustrated administration officials.

    GM looks increasingly like it will be forced into filing for bankruptcy
    protection, sometime in mid-to-late May, in a plan where the automaker
    breaks into two companies, the surviving entity a "new GM" that
    maintains key brands such as Chevy and Cadillac and some international
    units, say several people familiar with the situation.

    Stakes in this new GM could be given to creditors and UAW members. It is
    also possible the new company could be sold whole or in parts to investors.

    The auto makers could avoid bankruptcy in the next two months. And there
    is some brinksmanship still going on in GM's high-level talks with
    bondholders, union members and creditors.

    A key ingredient is getting the UAW to agree to an entirely new labor
    contract, including major reductions in health-care benefits, according
    to several people involved in the matter. "That's the No.1 wildcard
    here," one of these people said Monday.

    Under this plan, the "good" GM would not be expected to hold the tens of
    billions of dollars in retiree and health care obligations that hurt the
    auto maker in recent decades. Instead, those obligations would be
    transferred to an "old GM," made up of less-desirable brands like Hummer
    and Saturn, and underperforming plants and other assets. This part of GM
    would likely sit in bankruptcy much longer while a buyer is sought for
    the parts or it is wound down. Proceeds from the sale of old GM would go
    to pay claims to various creditors, including GM retirees.

    "That is the plan, to the extent it comports with the bankruptcy laws,"
    said one person familiar with the matter.

    Some of the New GM-Old GM is laid out in the GM viability plan the
    company sent to the federal government last month. In it, GM estimates
    that it would shrink from 22% of the U.S. market to about 19%.

    At Chrysler, bankruptcy would be used to force new labor contracts and
    rework debt deals with secured creditors. People working on Chrysler's
    behalf say the deal is risky, because the company is still not convinced
    that it could survive even a short-term bankruptcy. It could be done in
    order to meet the Obama administration's demand that Chrysler's
    creditors agree to huge reductions in their expected recoveries on
    Chrysler debt.

    Also Monday, new GM Chief Executive Frederick "Fritz" Henderson told
    employees and dealers that the company will end up in bankruptcy court
    if it does not significantly accelerate its restructuring efforts in the
    next 60 days, according to a dealer who watched a broadcast of a meeting
    with Mr. Henderson.

    Mr. Henderson said "we'll be in bankruptcy" if the company cannot meet
    the U.S. government's demands for faster progress on its turnaround
    plan, this dealer said.

    Mr. Henderson told employees that the Obama administration was
    disappointed with the company's viability plan, feeling it didn't move
    fast enough or cut deeply enough into the company's debt. GM was told
    it didn't leave enough money in the company's pockets to get it through
    a full business cycle, either, according to the dealer.

    GM was also told in no uncertain terms that it must learn to make money
    on smaller cars–not just trucks and sport-utility vehicles, the dealer said.

    Warning that they can't depend on unending taxpayer dollars, President
    Obama on Monday gave GM and Chrysler a brief window to craft plans that
    would justify fresh government loans.

    "We cannot, we must not, and we will not let our auto industry simply
    vanish," President Obama said at the White House.

    "What we are asking is difficult," he said. "It will require hard
    choices by companies. It will require unions and workers who have
    already made painful concessions to make even more. It will require
    creditors to recognize that they cannot hold out for the prospect of
    endless government bailouts."

    The remarks came a day after the administration ousted GM Chief
    Executive Rick Wagoner and rejected the restructuring plans that GM and
    Chrysler had hoped would lead to another infusion of government cash.
    Instead, the White House is giving GM 60 days to come up with a strategy
    for viability. Chrysler has a month to wrap up a partnership with
    Italy's Fiat SpA.

    The Journal's John Stoll says that with billions in taxpayer money on
    the line, the Obama administration needs to work closely with GM to
    forge a more dramatic restructuring.

    GM on Monday said it will address "the tough issues to improve the
    long-term viability of the company," including the restructuring of its
    financial obligations, as it responded to Washington's calls for
    stronger plans to stay afloat.

    The administration says a "surgical" structured bankruptcy may be the
    only way forward for GM and Chrysler, and President Obama held out that
    prospect Monday.

    "I know that when people even hear the word 'bankruptcy,' it can be a
    bit unsettling, so let me explain what I mean," he said. "What I am
    talking about is using our existing legal structure as a tool that, with
    the backing of the U.S. government, can make it easier for General
    Motors and Chrysler to quickly clear away old debts that are weighing
    them down so they can get back on their feet and onto a path to success;
    a tool that we can use, even as workers are staying on the job building
    cars that are being sold."

    GM said it prefers to complete its restructuring out of court, saying it
    would complete a more accelerated and aggressive restructuring to put
    the company on sound long-term financial footing.

    "We have significant challenges ahead of us, and a very tight timeline,"
    said new GM CEO, Mr. Henderson. "I am confident that the GM team will
    succeed and that a stronger, healthier GM will play an important role in
    revitalizing America's economy and re-establishing its technology
    leadership and energy independence."

    The auto makers, hobbled by the economic downturn and years of reliance
    on sport-utility vehicles, will receive an unspecified amount of working
    capital from the government while they hone their new plans.

    Detroit in Crisis

    Without a Fiat deal, the administration said Chrysler won't receive any
    more taxpayer dollars. The administration expressed confidence GM can
    survive with more drastic action.

    GM and Chrysler received a total of $17.4 billion in government loans in
    December and have requested roughly another $22 billion to keep them
    going through this year. President Obama's auto task force combed
    through the firms' restructuring plans to judge if they merit the
    additional funds. The verdict released Sunday is that in their current
    form, the plans don't justify any new taxpayer resources.

    If Fiat and Chrysler reach a definitive alliance agreement, the
    government would consider investing as much as $6 billion more in Chrysler.

    Despite the grim view of Chrysler, the administration's task force said
    it had no intention of replacing CEO Robert Nardelli. Unlike Mr.
    Wagoner, who had been at the helm of GM since 2000, Mr. Nardelli is
    considered an auto-industry outsider who has only been in charge at
    Chrysler since the company was acquired by Cerberus Capital Management
    LP in 2007.

    In addition to pushing out Mr. Wagoner, the task force said GM is in the
    process of replacing the majority of its directors. Kent Kresa, a
    longtime director, will serve as interim chairman. Mr. Wagoner will be
    replaced as CEO by Mr. Henderson, who was been serving as chief
    operating officer.

    Administration officials on Sunday made it clear that an expedited and
    heavily supervised bankruptcy reorganization was still very much a
    possibility for both companies. One official, speaking of GM, compared
    such a proceeding with a "quick rinse" that could rid the company of
    much of its debt and contractual obligations.

    The clearest losers appear to be the thousands of bondholders and
    lenders to both GM and Chrysler. In both cases, administration officials
    said that the companies were burdened by inordinate amounts of debt that
    would have to be scrubbed. Chrysler's survival, the administration said,
    would require "extinguishing the vast majority" of the company's secured
    debt and all of its unsecured debt and equity.

    To assure consumers reluctant to buy GM or Chrysler cars, the government
    plans to take the unusual step of guaranteeing all warrantees on new
    cars from either company. These guarantees would lapse back to the
    companies once they return to health.

    Mr. Wagoner had managed GM through some of its most difficult moments.
    The company hasn't logged a profit since 2004, reporting losses since
    then of $82 billion. It nearly ran out of money at the end of 2008
    before the Treasury Department provided emergency loans. GM's stock was
    trading above $70 when Mr. Wagoner took over as CEO in June of 2000. The
    shares closed last week at $3.62, placing the company's market
    capitalization at $2.21 billion. In Monday trading on the New York Stock
    Exchange, GM shares were down 76 cents, or 21%, to $2.86.

    Mr. Wagoner's tenure came amid challenges that weren't entirely of his
    own making--including costly retiree benefits and union contracts that
    predate him, and the recent deep recession. Yet GM by most measures
    performed worse than other auto companies. Among the key decisions that
    hurt the company: a huge bet on trucks and SUVs that piled up on
    dealers' lots unsold as high gasoline prices drove Americans to look for
    more fuel economy offered by rival companies.

    Mr. Wagoner was asked to step down on Friday by Steven Rattner, the
    investment banker picked last month by the administration to lead the
    Treasury Department's auto-industry task force. Mr. Rattner broke the
    news to Mr. Wagoner in person at his office at the Treasury, according
    to an administration official. Afterward, Mr. Rattner met one-on-one
    with Mr. Henderson, who will fill in as GM's CEO.

    "On Friday I was in Washington for a meeting with administration
    officials," Mr. Wagoner said in a statement released by GM. "In the
    course of that meeting, they requested that I 'step aside' as CEO of GM,
    and so I have."

    GM spokesman Steve Harris declined to comment.

    In a statement released by GM Sunday night, Mr. Kresa said: "The Board
    has recognized for some time that the Company's restructuring will
    likely cause a significant change in the stockholders of the Company and
    create the need for new directors with additional skills and experience."

    Mr. Wagoner's removal shows that the sacrifices could cut deep. The
    departure of the company's top executive promises to further shake up a
    company that has already been through considerable change over the past
    six months. The 56-year-old executive had been scrambling to craft a
    strategy aimed at maintaining leadership in the global sales chase with
    Toyota Motor Corp. and making big profits in emerging markets.

    But Mr. Wagoner's plans came crashing down in the second half of 2008 as
    the company ran short of cash and was forced to ask the government for
    billions of dollars in aid. At the same time, his executive team started
    dismantling several parts of the company, including a plan to shed
    several brands, slow the pace of new-product introductions and sell
    stakes in international operations.
    Industry's Outlook

    The president's auto task force has spent more than a month digging into
    the restructuring plans that GM and Chrysler submitted last month. The
    team has struggled to make two determinations: when will the steep
    plunge in car sales end and what will the market look like once it revives.

    GM has based its revival plans on the U.S. market rebounding to sales of
    14.3 million vehicles a year in 2011, up from a rate of about nine
    million vehicles so far this year. Many analysts now consider GM's
    short-term forecasts to be overly optimistic.

    Of the $21.6 billion in additional funding that the auto makers have
    requested, GM is seeking $16.6 billion more, while Chrysler has asked
    for $5 billion more.

    Among challenges the administration faced leading up to this weekend's
    decision, foremost were the efforts to draw steep concessions from the
    United Auto Workers union and from the bondholders.

    Attempts to solidify deals with the UAW and bondholders were slowed by
    disagreements by both parties over how exactly the other party needed to
    budge. The UAW, for instance, insists it already made health-care
    concessions in 2005 and 2007, and argues that the bondholders have never
    been asked to concede anything.

    "I don't see how the UAW will do anything until they see what the
    bondholders will give up," one person involved in the negotiations on
    behalf of the UAW said Sunday.
    Bondholder Factor

    The bondholders have said that they are willing to make concessions, but
    they have wanted to see the union make further cuts. The fact GM raised
    most of the unsecured debt to fund union health-care and pension costs
    is also seen as a reason why the union needs to take bigger steps.

    With Mr. Obama potentially holding off on new loans until concessions
    are made, analysts said GM likely has enough cash on hand to weather at
    least another month before its need for more government aid becomes
    urgent. Chrysler may need another infusion of cash sooner. Ford Motor
    Co. hasn't sought federal assistance.

    Both GM and Chrysler are negotiating with the UAW to accept a range of
    cost-cutting measures, including greatly reduced work forces, lower
    wages and a revamped health-care fund for retirees.

    The U.S. auto industry has been reeling from a plunge in car sales over
    the last six months. Sales in February were down about 40% over the same
    month last year. The drop has sent shock waves through the hundreds of
    smaller parts companies that supply the big auto makers. To keep the
    sector afloat, the administration recently announced a $5 billion
    financing facility to help suppliers cover their expenses.

    The original December loans were given under the agreement that all
    sides would strike a compromise deal by March 31, but the administration
    is taking advantage of a clause allowing all sides another month to
    negotiate. "It was unrealistic to renegotiate a new labor agreement and
    the unsecured debt in so short a time," said Sean McAlinden, chief
    economist with the Center for Automotive Research, in Ann Arbor, Mich.
    "That has never happened before."

    GM and Chrysler are meant to submit by Tuesday assessments of where
    their restructuring efforts are heading. In February, both companies put
    forward plans for paring their operations, reducing their work forces
    and eliminating vehicle models.

    GM and representatives for its bondholders remained in talks over the
    weekend about a deal that would force these investors to turn in at
    least two-thirds of the value of the debt they hold in exchange for
    equity and new debt.

    This arrangement would force GM to issue significantly more stock than
    what is currently being traded in the market. In addition, the
    government is being asked to guarantee the new debt with federal default
    insurance in order to entice bondholders who otherwise wouldn't be
    interested in participating in the swap.

    If GM can't eventually forge a deal with the ad hoc committee
    representing the bondholders, the company may be forced to issue a
    debt-for-equity swap without the blessing of some of its biggest and
    most influential unsecured investors. This would heighten the
    possibility of the company eventually needing to file for Chapter 11
    bankruptcy protection.

    The group representing GM bondholders was reviewing the White House
    documents and plans to make a formal response later Monday, according to
    a person familiar with the situation.
     
    Jim Higgins, Mar 30, 2009
    #1
  2. Jim Higgins

    Bill Putney Guest

    And right about now, Ford is telling itself "Man, are we glad we didn't
    take that money!!" For one thing, it can work out whatever deals it
    needs to make with a whole host of entities without either being
    dictated to by Obama *or* without Obama totally negating any leverage it
    has in making the deals by showing the whole world its complete hand
    every step of the way. Talk about being totally emasculated! Computer
    viruses don't work this effectively or thoroughly.
     
    Bill Putney, Mar 31, 2009
    #2
  3. Jim Higgins

    MoPar Man Guest

    Just wait. It's not April 1 yet.
     
    MoPar Man, Mar 31, 2009
    #3
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.