Need info on plants to be sold by DC

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by no-one-here, Dec 26, 2003.

  1. no-one-here

    MoPar Man Guest

    Chrysler can bring concept cars to market faster than Merc. The logic
    being that Daimler can transplant that ability into Merc. Step 1 of
    that process is to throw in the toilet all current Chrysler concepts.
    Step 2 is - what? Where is the evidence that Chrysler's
    concept-to-market knowhow is being used by Merc? (other than to
    re-design Chrysler vehicles so that they use more Merc parts?)
    Lutz was in his late 60's when he left (67 I think). He was hired by
    GM in 2001 and was going to "shake up the place". Anyone seen any
    shaking at GM lately? No matter how good Lutz was as at product
    development, if you don't have good design people in the trenches
    turning out ideas then you don't have squat. Besides, he was
    Vice-chairman when he left. That's a long way from product
    manager/designer.
    If there's an on-line reference, please quote the article.
    If they don't require a subscription, and I'm sufficiently motivated,
    sure. I'm usually too busy reading other (non-automotive) industry
    publications.
    You'd be wrong. Ok, maybe once every few years when I'm in the market
    for a dishwasher or fridge.
    Only when they review radar detectors.
    Like your industry publications? Is that why you read them?
     
    MoPar Man, Dec 30, 2003
    #21
  2. Um, DS said that Damlier now _can't_ transplant this faster
    to market ability to Merc because all the talent jumped ship.
    So why would there be evidence that the concept-to-market
    knowhow is being used by Merc? They don't have it anymore
    and lost it after the merger.

    Also don't forget the US economy went into a depression shortly
    after the takeover, and a great many things started to change. The
    process was hastened by 9-11 and GM's subsequent kickoff of
    a price war on 0% interest. Neither of these things were known
    in advance (although many people were expecting the stock market to
    crash, just not that quickly)

    While I, like Daniel, believe that Damlier wanted more than a simple
    market share increase by buying Chrysler it seems quite obvious today
    that Damlier has abandonded all hope of getting anything more out
    of Chrysler OTHER THAN market share. Clearly they have written
    off Chrysler's engineering and design team and expect them to only
    integrate Merc parts into the Chrysler model line. In another 10 years
    if Damlier doesen't let Chrysler go, the typical Chrysler/Dodge vehicle
    will be indistinguishable from the Mercedes vehicle under the hood, the
    only external difference will be styling changes. Merc will be positioned
    to the high-end market, Dodge will be everybody else, and Chrysler will
    be sandwiched in the middle somewhere. This is the model that GM is
    using with the Buick/Chevrolet/Olds lines.

    Ted
     
    Ted Mittelstaedt, Dec 30, 2003
    #22
  3. no-one-here

    MoPar Man Guest

    If Daimler *really* had planned on taking advantage of Chrysler's
    concept-to-market ability and applying it to the Merc line, then they
    would have either anticipated (1) performing a substantial amount of
    Merc vehicle concept work in Detroit or (2) transplanting the Chrysler
    "dream team" to Stuttgart. Who really believes that either of those
    options were viable (now, or back in 1998) ?

    I think there is way more evidence that Daimler, since day 1 of the
    "merger", wanted Chrysler's design team to scrap all current concepts
    and begin immediately to redesign Chrysler vehicles to integrate Merc
    parts. You might say that this is how Merc "took advantage" of
    Chrysler's concept-to-market ability, but not in a satisfying way for
    Chrysler's designers.
     
    MoPar Man, Dec 30, 2003
    #23
  4. no-one-here

    CBhvac Guest

    300C...closest thing to it..
    http://www.carnuttv.com/coolcar.htm

    The Magnum Hemi isnt bad either..
    http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/aug2001/nf2001082_510.htm

    http://www.autointell.com/nao_companies/general_motors/gm-management/gm-bob-lutz-01.htm

    http://www.auto.com/2003show/iwirl6_20030106.htm


    Still looking for the article that I found not long ago that talked about
    it....the design team that is..
     
    CBhvac, Jan 1, 2004
    #24
  5. no-one-here

    MoPar Man Guest

    In name only. It's a rolling abomination. I don't care what it has
    under the hood. If it looks like a boxy Bentley (and weighs as much,
    and if it's got an SUV as a brother) then it ain't no sports-luxury
    sedan. The interior design is plain crap. It has a front and side
    profile that only a feeble senior citizen would love.
    A waste of a power plant. The 300C is an SUV that's trying real hard
    to be a sedan. If I wanted something like that, I'd buy a Ram with
    the hemi.
    3 stories about Lutz moving to GM. None of which hint at all about
    any discontent at Chrysler over design issues, internal politics,
    staff leaving, etc. Again, who is bold enough at Chrysler to give an
    interview about design-team morale, about the politics between
    Chrysler and Daimer, about where chrysler's designs are heading and
    who's doing the driving.
     
    MoPar Man, Jan 2, 2004
    #25
  6. no-one-here

    Johan Thole Guest

    Well, ehm, you've read how the Germans judge the build quality of the M-Klasse?

    Johan
     
    Johan Thole, Jan 13, 2004
    #26
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.