Magnum

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by mdrawson, Jul 13, 2005.

  1. mdrawson

    mdrawson Guest

    Anyone here bought a Magnum R/T?

    What's been your experience? Any problems?
     
    mdrawson, Jul 13, 2005
    #1
  2. mdrawson

    Dan Guest

    1) Car runs like a scalded dog.
    2) Early production models pulled to the right. Fixed by dealer.
    Adjusted cradle and installed new alignment adjustment bolt.
    3) Center rear seat belt retractor jammed first time granddaughter sat
    in middle seat. Fixed by dealer.
    4) Continental tires are prone to premature wear. Wear bars showing
    at 20,000 miles.

    Car is fun to drive, handles great, and gets reasonable mileage for a
    4,400 pound wagon. And it's FAST.

    Extra storage area under false floor in back is really handy for stuff
    like a small emergency kit, jumper cables, etc., or small items you
    don't want rolling around.

    Dan
     
    Dan, Jul 13, 2005
    #2
  3. Just curious what you consider reasonable mileage? I have a 300C, it has
    the performance of a rocket unfortunately it also has the fuel economy of
    a rocket. I'm getting less than 15MPG, 18 on the highway, my old
    Concorde got 22, and 29 on the highway.
     
    General Schvantzkoph, Jul 13, 2005
    #3
  4. mdrawson

    mdrawson Guest

    Good input, thanx. I am curious about the mileage. The sticker says 25
    highway (I'd use the car primarily as a road car).
     
    mdrawson, Jul 14, 2005
    #4
  5. mdrawson

    Dan Guest

    Do you have the 5.7 with multiple displacement system (MDS)?

    I've got the 5.7L HEMI MDS in the RT. I get about 18 around town and
    22/23 on trips. A good bit of "around town" is local interstate.
    Trips have been 2 or three adults with enough luggage to fill a moving
    van, driving 75 to 85 most of the way.

    My milege is way better than the guys I know with the 5.7L in Dodge
    trucks. I know a guy with a Magnum with the larger V-6 who says I'm
    getting better mileage than he is.

    Dan
     
    Dan, Jul 14, 2005
    #5
  6. Yes I have the 5.7 HEMI with AWD. I've got a couple of long trips coming
    up in the next couple of weeks, I'll see what I get on thiose. But so far
    I've been getting between 14.7 and 16.
     
    General Schvantzkoph, Jul 14, 2005
    #6
  7. Before I bought my 300C I did a back of the envelope calculation to see if
    the lousy mileage would pass my threshold of pain. I only drive 12000
    miles a year, a figure thats been constant for 30 years. The difference
    between the 300C and something more economical like an Acura TL (which
    gets 22) is 250 gallons a year. If you assume $2.5 a gallon that's around
    $650, if you assume $5 a gallon then a still only $1300 which isn't much
    considering that the car costs $40,000. However there is the inconvenience
    of having to fill up all the time, at 15MPG the range is pretty limited.
     
    General Schvantzkoph, Jul 14, 2005
    #7
  8. mdrawson

    Dan Guest

    On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 17:32:28 -0400, General Schvantzkoph

    SNIP
    My Magnum RT is just rear wheel drive. I would expect slightly lower
    gas mileage with 4WD, similar to the difference in gas mileage between
    2WD and 4WD trucks. My kid the drag racer knows all the technical
    terms to explain the difference. Something about "rotating weight" of
    the drive train every time you accelerate from a stop. Anyway, 4WD
    usually uses more gas.

    Dan
     
    Dan, Jul 15, 2005
    #8
  9. mdrawson

    Steve Guest

    On a related note- are you Magnum owners happy with the capacity of the
    air-conditioning system? Especially anyone in Texas, New Mexico, or Arizona.

    I've had two Magnums as rentals now, and neither one seemed to have as
    much A/C power as our 1993 LH car does, or as my '66 Polara. The Magnums
    both eventually got cool, but took a LONG time to get really cold and
    had to be kept on "max" for much longer than I'm used to. In fact, the
    second rental was in Iowa during the recent "heat wave" (although it was
    only 104, and it gets a lot hotter than that at home routinely) and it
    pretty much HAD to be kept on "max" all the time. If the R/T has an
    equally puny A/C system, I'm afraid its right off the list of possible
    replacements for the '93 when the time comes. :-(


    The first rental was a 3.5L car, and I was surprised that it was
    reasonably peppy. The second was a 2.7L car, and I was ashamed to be
    driving it... they REALLY shouldn't offer that engine in such a heavy car.
     
    Steve, Aug 5, 2005
    #9
  10. mdrawson

    Steve Guest

    Oh, AWD. Low mileage on that model is no surprise at all. I'd stick with
    straight RWD.
     
    Steve, Aug 5, 2005
    #10
  11. mdrawson

    Steve B. Guest


    I have also rented the Magnum twice and both times found the a/c to
    about worthless down here in sunny Florida. Drove one of them with
    the 2.7L up in to the mountains in North Carolina. I never knew an
    engine could rev that high for that long.....

    Steve B.
     
    Steve B., Aug 5, 2005
    #11
  12. mdrawson

    Matt Whiting Guest

    Never watched the Indy 500, eh?


    Matt
     
    Matt Whiting, Aug 6, 2005
    #12
  13. mdrawson

    Buhda Guest

    Who rents Magnums?? I mean what company??
     
    Buhda, Aug 6, 2005
    #13
  14. mdrawson

    Steve B. Guest

    Dollar rent-a-car. They also rent 300's and other current Chrysler
    corp products.

    Steve B.
     
    Steve B., Aug 6, 2005
    #14
  15. There is no such company as "Chrysler Corp". Hasn't been since 1998.
     
    Daniel J. Stern, Aug 6, 2005
    #15
  16. mdrawson

    Steve B. Guest

    And there is no such thing as R13. Blow it out your ass Daniel.

    Steve B.
     
    Steve B., Aug 6, 2005
    #16
  17. Steve it seems like you live in Texas, RWD is fine for the South. I live
    in New England, no way would I drive a RWD car here, we have this stuff
    called snow.
     
    General Schvantzkoph, Aug 6, 2005
    #17
  18. mdrawson

    Steve Guest

    That's not encouraging. The LH cars had really potent AC systems because
    a) they had a ton of glass area and b) Chrysler was probably going over
    the top because those were the first R-134a systems and they wanted to
    be sure they got a reputation for good cooling (they cooled GREAT, but
    the evaporators rotted away). I'm afraid that SOME engineer or
    bean-counter somewhere decided they could cut way back on the LX
    platform AC because of the smaller windows. Big mistake, if they did...
    The 2.7 is an embarrassment.
     
    Steve, Aug 7, 2005
    #18
  19. mdrawson

    Steve Guest

    Dollar Rent-a-car is an all-Chrysler fleet. Thrifty and Enterprise both
    have a lot of Magnums as well.
     
    Steve, Aug 7, 2005
    #19
  20. mdrawson

    Steve Guest

    Well, you really should do something about that. Wouldn't tolerate it,
    myself..... ;-)

    But what's the hangup with RWD in snow? Everyone drove RWD in the snow
    until the 80s (and yes, I've driven both FWD and RWD cars in the snow on
    rare occasions too... I don't do ALL my driving in Texas after all) :)

    I'd take RWD with traction control over FWD without it in the snow ANY day.
     
    Steve, Aug 7, 2005
    #20
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.