Hybrid Lovers Read This and Lament

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Nomen Nescio, Nov 20, 2005.

  1. Nomen Nescio

    Brian Guest

    Thanks for the interesting reply.

    B
     
    Brian, Dec 13, 2005
  2. Nomen Nescio

    Oscar_Lives Guest

    What are you going to do with all that nuclear waste?
     
    Oscar_Lives, Dec 13, 2005
  3. Nomen Nescio

    dold Guest

    Store it safely for a few decades, until we learn how to extract the
    remaining energy. Maybe at low toxicity levels, it will be sold for use in
    individual Mr. Fusion home power plants.
     
    dold, Dec 13, 2005
  4. Nomen Nescio

    Brian Guest

    Yes exactly. We have a few squillion square miles of unused dirt (so have you)
    that we could store horrendous amounts of waste. If you fly over Canada you get
    some idea of just how much unused dirt we really have. It's even bigger then
    Texas! (O: (O:
     
    Brian, Dec 13, 2005
  5. Nomen Nescio

    Brian Guest

    Yes exactly. We have a few squillion square miles of unused dirt (so have you)
    that we could store horrendous amounts of waste. If you fly over Canada you get
    some idea of just how much unused dirt we really have. It's even bigger then
    Texas! (O: (O:
     
    Brian, Dec 13, 2005
  6. Nomen Nescio

    gosinn Guest

    There are two types of Nuclear energy
    One of them has no waste
    The other has a lot less waste than oil
     
    gosinn, Dec 13, 2005
  7. I've heard it tastes great as a seasoning in soups.

    Ted
     
    Ted Mittelstaedt, Dec 13, 2005
  8. Nomen Nescio

    joe schmoe Guest

    You don't think we could re-enrich it and send it to be stored where
    we get all of our oil from at the moment? We've got lots of unused
    ICBM's sitting around ;-) Kidding of course ;-)

    BTW How much waste is generated by fusion reactors? can't be too much.

    I believe that there's more radioactive medical waste generated than
    power plant radioactive waste. (but I could be wrong) No one is
    saying that we should quit treating people to reduce pollution are
    they?
     
    joe schmoe, Dec 13, 2005
  9. Nomen Nescio

    Bill Putney Guest

    Theoretically, yes, but you don't understand modern business, which is
    good at taking things that have an inherent nature of lasting a lifetime
    and thinning things down, using less critical materials, etc. to last
    only as long as is economically optimum for themselves. All it takes is
    a little research for them to find out which part(s) or component(s)
    they can exactly control to make it fail at the prescribed time to end
    up having a break-even of about what it is with competing technologies.

    But you're right - it will probably happen. Just like with other
    things, a lot will be promised in the beginning with a lot of genuine
    technical potential, but the results will be engineered and politicized
    and environmentallized to the point that it's no better than anything else.

    Bill Putney
    (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
    address with the letter 'x')
     
    Bill Putney, Dec 13, 2005
  10. Nomen Nescio

    gosinn Guest

    You can strike it lucky and you can gain a lot by being a pioneer
    The new technology may be faulty and you can get a faulty system
    The likelyhood of striking out is not very great because the companies
    are well aware that they have to create a good image and not let you
    get anything that brakes straightaway
    Ok at least some of them anyway
    The real problem at the moment is that the infrastructure of the
    country is not ready
    So you might not be able to travel very far away if you are into the
    most modern technologies and no place to get fuel
     
    gosinn, Dec 13, 2005
  11. Nomen Nescio

    gosinn Guest

    The question is how new this technology is really
    There were electrical cars before combustion engine cars cam along
    Also these hybrid cars have been decades in development stage
    Lots of the companies have been trying to overcome probelms with pure
    electrical cars
    Always failing because of refueling problems, battery sizes and weight
    With a fuel cell and electrical car hybrid most problems are gone
    With oil and electrical hybrids as a medium term solution
    Toyota seems to be way ahead of the pack, Honda a good second with the
    rest scrambling to catch up
    Problem for most of the big companies is they have to get rid of old
    technologies, old plants, old workers, old bad image before they can
    start really down the road of the future with these new technologies
    They have for obvious reasons been dragging their feet of going in for
    these changes but they seem to have realized that if they do not do it
    then they will be stuck with all those old problems and nothing to
    replace it once the closures are a fact

    So now we have started to see plants being closed down and plans for
    more closures

    Question is where will the new plants be built, by whom and how fast
    will these changes take place

    Who will live to make the change

    Pretty exciting times ahead for us customers
     
    gosinn, Dec 13, 2005
  12. Nomen Nescio

    Floyd Rogers Guest

    If you're talking fusion, you're completely wrong that it has no waste.

    FloydR
     
    Floyd Rogers, Dec 13, 2005
  13. Nomen Nescio

    gosinn Guest

    fusion has only helium and energy as results
    What you may be thinking of are some experiments have needed fission as
    a starter
    then you may get some waste from the starter
    Other methods of starters give no waste
    Fusion contained in a magnetic fields and started by electricity is the
    future of nuclear
    Until then fission is a good alternative and has a proven very good
    record
    Nuclear will rise again
     
    gosinn, Dec 13, 2005
  14. Nomen Nescio

    Mike Hunter Guest

    Nuclear waste will be confined to the Yucca mountain site, as soon as the
    'politics' of doing so is settled. That is a far more secure place of
    storing it then under six feet of water in the power plants as is the case
    now.


    mike hunt
     
    Mike Hunter, Dec 13, 2005
  15. Nomen Nescio

    Floyd Rogers Guest

    No. You are ignoring the facts of real engineering, as opposed to
    an ideal thought experiment - which can never be realized in the
    physical world. All current experiments in fusion have resulted
    in radioactive waste - google TFTR, or google fusion waste if you
    want examples.

    All fusion reactors will, unavoidably, produce radioactive waste,
    mostly due to the interaction of the neutron flux produced as it
    impacts the vessel walls or coolant.

    FloydR
     
    Floyd Rogers, Dec 13, 2005
  16. Nomen Nescio

    gosinn Guest

    The fission solution is available, safe, competitive, reliable,
    operational. The problem of high
    activity waste disposal is, objectively, a minor problem, changed into
    a severe social
    problem by mass medias. The nuclear waste problem is tiny compared to
    the gigantic one
    generated by billions tons of CO2, SO2, NOX sent every year in our
    atmosphere from
    fossils fuels.

    Fusion is without waste
     
    gosinn, Dec 13, 2005
  17. Nomen Nescio

    Floyd Rogers Guest

    sigh.
     
    Floyd Rogers, Dec 14, 2005
  18. Nomen Nescio

    DTJ Guest

    Bury it underground with all the nuclear waste the earth produced on
    its own.

    Launch it into space and send it into the sun, all the while laughing
    at the environmentalist idiots who file lawsuits claiming that adding
    ..0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001%
    of nuclear fuel to the sun's mass is an environmental disaster.

    Put it down michael jackson's pants.

    Ship it to france, tell them it is from SH.

    Allow the muslims in the world to experience first hand what a nuclear
    bomb does.

    I am sure we can come up with more if we try.
     
    DTJ, Dec 14, 2005
  19. Nomen Nescio

    DTJ Guest

    Zero, unless you allow the environmentalist idiots to file lawsuits
    claiming adding water to the environment is a disaster.
     
    DTJ, Dec 14, 2005
  20. Nomen Nescio

    Joe Guest

    Thanks for the crossposting, y'all. Plus all that incredibly informed
    discussion. Keep it up!
     
    Joe, Dec 15, 2005
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.