Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers

Care to compare Clinton's economy to either of the Bushs'?

 

I see another fool who's never actually read the constitution. Article I,
section 8, not the preamble (not the spelling too).

 

http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/florida.ballots/stories/main.html

 

Like atmospheric chemistry?

Yeah, tell them about your scientific qualifications to judge me too.

 

Gee, you know more science than the thousands in IPCC, EPA, NASA, NOAA,
National Academy of Sciences, and American Geophysical Union!

 

Well he just offended 95% of the "average guy" in the last couple of
days with his spastic tap dancing. Al Sharpton still hasn't decided if
he'll accept his apology as a representative of "all the black people".

Like they say: "You couldn't write this stuff!".
Bill Putney
(to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with "x")

 

Man's hardly making a dent. (and man is not exactly separate from
nature anyway).

Now, you want to talk about pollution, at one time there were these
single-celled organisms that released as waste a corrosive gas which
eventually became up to 30% of the atmosphere. MAJOR die-offs then,
the stuff was deadly poison to nearly all the organisms alive at the
time. And perfectly natural, too. Man? Man's a piker. Pushed up
CO2 levels a little maybe, but not even anywhere near all-time highs.
And the stuff's nowhere near as toxic as the earlier gas.

 

That's one model. A better model is a single-nap cone, with the apex
at the bottom. Towards the wide end of the cone, individual rights.
Towards the narrow, less. The usual spectrum is a closed curve drawn
on the surface of this cone; your circle is a projection of it.

The curve is dropping quickly towards the apex.

 

C. E. White wrote:

If the ecosystem were as unstable as the global warmers implied, one of
the countless cataclysmic events of the past would have tipped the
balance millenia ago and run the environment off to either hellish heat
or a frozen wasteland.

Atmospheric CO2 is no doubt higher now than at the dawn of the
industrial age, but the earth has *huge* buffering mechanisms that can
kick in to stabilize temperatures. Far more than the "ban all cars"
crowd gives it credit for.

 

America will heal itself. We're just letting Dean along for the ride
because we think he's going to listen to the average guy... instead of the
wealthy few. <

The "wealthy few" amount to millions of people whom Howard Dean will court
favor with, as does any politician. The last time the poor tried running
countries Mao and Joseph Stalin became their leaders.

 

It is not money that is being taxed, it is people. After all it is
people who pay taxes, and rich offspring have never paid any taxes on their
parents estate. Even so, Democrats proposed to abolish the tax for estates
of up to 2 million dollars (later 5, 10 or even 100 million), but this was
not good enough for the Bush administration, they had to abolish a tax that
mainly affected the already super-rich.<

Are you nuts? The threshod for ther Estate Tax is $650k, that's hardly
"super rich". My sister's husband has an aunt whose nearly two hundred year
old Indiana farm appreciated to nearly $700k. The estate taxes were such
that it's had to be sold and most of the proceeds broken up into "gifts" to
keep the government from confiscating roughly 60% of its value in taxes. She
never made more than $30k a year.

 

Your wrong again Parker.

http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/paleo/pubs/monnin2001/monnin2001.html

Clearly this shows that CO2 levels were aproximately 195ppm 17,000 years
ago. Rising to aproximately 265ppm about 9000 years ago.

You clearly haven't. In a couple minutes of searching I've turned
up proof from a source you've certified (NOAA), that you are wrong.

 

Science tells up CO2 absorbs heat, science tells us the earth is warming,
science tells us CO2 has increased along with temperature, science tells us
human activities produce CO2. <

Yeah, WEIRD, GREEN Science!!!!

 

Naa, I just know more science than you. (OK, perhaps not chemistry,
but I wouldn't bet on that if I were you). Heck, I'm even published.

 

They have a sense of entitlement and moral superiority that aloows them to
use whatever extreme measures are required to return themselves to their
proper place in the seat of power. <

Precisely, these arrogant, elitist people are currently spouting alarmist
rhetoric about the dangers of "one party rule", but seemed to think it was
okay back in the mid-late 7-'s under Carter and a Dem Congress. What a bunch
of hypocrites!

 

People are dead because fascists like you herded them into death camps. <

Lloyd, you've reached a new low! (And, what would you Socialists call your
pal Joe Stalin's Gulags, Boy Scout Camps?)

 

Since 2001, 12 governorships have gone from republican to democrat, and 12
the opposite. <

And you just lost 2 more!

 

Lowered the deficit, showed investors we were serious about getting our
deficit under control. <

He had NO PLAN to lower the deficiet, he enacted a massive tax increase in
order to generate funds for more tax & spend bullshit. His deal got
completely queered when Republicans took control of Congress (the ones who
do the actual spending) and refused to allow any more spending silliness.
The resulting surplus was a fluke.

 

I've already paid taxes on my salary, so I shouldn't have to pay sales tax
when I use it to buy something. <

RIGHT! Hey, Lloyd is catching on!