Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers

I can't count how many trips I've taken back then going up the California
central valley or across the Nevada desert with 55mph signs posted all the
way. Of course, no one ever really drove 55 on those roads. I think the
only effect that law had was to raise the blood pressure and stress level of
millions of drivers, not to mention a permanent crick in your neck due to
checking the rear view mirror so often.

 

You've learned from experience, Lloyd never has. ;-)

 

Cute, but zealots have claimed to be on the side of God throughout history.
The fact is, the political spectrum runs from communism and socialism on the
left, to fascism and Nazism on the right.

And Republicans wanting to force Christian prayer in schools, displays of the
10 Commandments in public buildings, telling a woman what to do with her body,
telling people which kind of sex to have -- none of these are trying to compel
people to act a certain way?

 

I thought you dittoheads were taking a rest with your idol in rehab.

 

And for each of those, there are family members shot in anger or accidentally,
suicides with a handy gun, children shooting children with a gun found in the
house, shooting of a neighbor the homeowner thought was a burglar, etc.

 

CO2 put into the air by nature has been in balance for millions of years.
It's man changing this equilibrium that's the problem.

 

Humans put out more CO2 than nature by several orders of magnitude.

 

Bush's was bigger, since it raised the payroll tax.

Explain how Clinton's tax on the wealthy hurt the economy.

 

Totally false. I suggest remedial reading for you.

 

Not proven.

And the NAS looked at it and said NHTSA's study was flawed -- they lumped
together cars of different weights, they lumped together model years with
different safety features, etc.

 

Do you have any idea how few estates are subject to the estate tax?

 

Not so. My employer won't even give me the money they save by my not being
married and not needing their subsidy for health insurance for a spouse,
tuition for children, etc. You're deluding yourself if you think employers
would give employees the money they'd save if they didn't have to pay SS.

Which your employer would keep as profit otherwise.

 

No, it was the Republicans who tried to stop an honest recounting of the
votes.

Says who?

 

So why should a US citizen who lives in Mississippi not have the same rights
and privileges as one who lives in New York?

They wanted the government to "provide for the general welfare" and wrote that
into the constitution.

 

Wrong. As the media reported, depending on how the votes were counted
(strictly, loosely), Bush would win some recounts and Gore would win some.

 

Yes, those 8 years of gloom, doom, and recession. When the stock market goes
above 10,000, that's a sure sign of recession. When unemployment hits record
lows, gotta be in a recession!

 

FL law allowed for a candidate to ask for a recount in specific counties.

The US constitution provides that a person's transgressions do not extend to
their children. Guess that puts you on the wrong side of the constitution.

 

Only when your side starts with the "socialist" or "communist" name calling.

If you're going to challenge established science, you need some expertise.

 

I've learned from science; you never have.

 

Prove it.