Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Dianelos Georgoudis, Oct 17, 2003.

  1. He seems to have a knack for it, glad I'm not arguing against him. :)
     
    The Ancient One, Nov 5, 2003
  2. Dianelos Georgoudis

    Brent P Guest

    Thanks :)

    But I have to admit, this is the product of experience. First,
    Dr. Parker has been around the auto groups longer than I can
    remember so that's old hat. Secondly, I spent a trial by fire in
    politics er sci.environment where I learned the hard way how
    left-wingers masquading as environmentalists work. I had been
    naive and thought it was science group.
     
    Brent P, Nov 5, 2003
  3. Dianelos Georgoudis

    Brent P Guest

    Know it well, I did not know the same people were responsible for CAFE.
    But it figures. It's the same sort of half-assed job without thinking
    it through. One of these days I should estimate how much extra fuel
    is burned due to CAFE by calculating what could be saved using large
    passenger cars instead (assuming a 15% market slice for light trucks as
    it was before CAFE of course). hmmm....

    I've stated it before though, emissions regs required better control
    systems and better control systems lead to better fuel economy. A
    simplification of course, as in some areas emissions and fuel economy
    can conflict. (lean burn, NOx, etc...)
     
    Brent P, Nov 5, 2003
  4. Its actually 101% when you include the death taxes.
     
    Kingbarry2000, Nov 5, 2003
  5. But I have to admit, this is the product of experience. First,
    thought it was science group.>

    Never confuse environmentalists with science, they have repeatedly proven
    themselves to be radical Socialists in green clothing!
     
    Gerald G. McGeorge, Nov 6, 2003
  6. Its actually 101% when you include the death taxes.>

    LOL!

    What Lloyd doesn;t want anyone to understand is that when your employer pays
    your Social Security taxes, in round numbers he pays around 13%, half paid
    by you and shown on your paycheck stub, the other half withheld from your
    TRUE SALARY/WAGES and paid by the employer. In other words, the employer
    shows the additional 6.2% as part of your your true compensation on his
    books. Lloyd thinks it's a tax on the employer, but it's not, it's a tax on
    YOU. That's why self-employed persons get the joyous honor of paying the
    WHOLE amount, with the second half called "self-employment tax" on the 1040,
    another piece of subterfuge your liberal tax & spend eleceted
    representatives concocted back in the '70's when they wrote this entire scam
    tax code.

    Lloyd and the other leftists think everyone's too stupid to figure this all
    out, but it's actually very easy to unravel it using a program like Turbo
    Tax....
     
    Gerald G. McGeorge, Nov 6, 2003
  7. Dianelos Georgoudis

    C. E. White Guest

    If only things worked that way.

    Ed
     
    C. E. White, Nov 6, 2003
  8. Dianelos Georgoudis

    Bill Putney Guest

    Sarcasm, right? 8^)

    I always get a kick out of hearing reports that such-and-such a city has
    too much ozone (considered a pollutant). Whenever I hear such reports,
    I rush to that city and discharge a couple of cans of R12 to neutralize
    the ozone - what do they claim - 10 to 1 effectiveness? Just trying to
    do my part to save the world.

    Bill Putney
    (to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
    address with "x")
     
    Bill Putney, Nov 6, 2003
  9. Dianelos Georgoudis

    Joe Guest

    "And there're no corrupt Republican machines? Hello, Texas? Florida?"
    Wasn't it the corrupt democrats that tried to illegally alter the results of
    Florida? The final results were accurate and valid.
     
    Joe, Nov 6, 2003
  10. Dianelos Georgoudis

    Joe Guest

    LLoyd, please crop your messages... as for "Yes, but you right-wingers
    obviously do not know what a socialist is." please use the more
    politically-correct term for "right-wingers"... that would be
    "correct-wingers"
     
    Joe, Nov 6, 2003
  11. Dianelos Georgoudis

    Joe Guest

    At a federal level? YES. STATES should do that, NOT the feds... But why
    listen to what the "founding fathers" wanted...
     
    Joe, Nov 6, 2003
  12. And what the Dems never acknowledge is the fact that Floridas votes were
    recounted again after Bush was declared the winner, every vote was counted,
    no matter how poorly marked, and it gave Bush more votes than the final
    official count had given him.
     
    Douglas A. Shrader, Nov 6, 2003
  13. Dianelos Georgoudis

    Joe Guest

    "Explain how increased taxes improve the economy."
    It improves the economy by starting a recession (ex. the Clinton
    Recession)... see the logic I followed there??
     
    Joe, Nov 6, 2003
  14. Dianelos Georgoudis

    Joe Guest

    Those damn corrupt republicans!!! The damn corrupt republicans also kept
    that news out of the mainstream press that is obviously conservative...
     
    Joe, Nov 6, 2003
  15. Dianelos Georgoudis

    Joe Guest

    Hello??? LLLLLOYD are you published in your field of expertise?? I am, are
    you?????
     
    Joe, Nov 6, 2003
  16. Dianelos Georgoudis

    Joe Guest

    "But I bet you understood what I menat in the first place....didn't you?"
    Nope, thought you were being stoopid... sorry!
     
    Joe, Nov 6, 2003
  17. Dianelos Georgoudis

    C. E. White Guest

    I was listening to NLPR (National Liberal Public Radio) earlier today
    and they ahd a piece on how certain groups were disenchanted with the
    electoral process because of the supposed problems in Florida (see
    http://www.npr.org/features/feature.php?wfId=1493747 ). They had
    numerous people talk about how they were certain that their ballots had
    been incorrectly marked and that their votes weren't counted. The funny
    thing was, the only people that seemed to have problems voting in
    Florida were trying to vote for Gore. I find it hard to believe that the
    system was so out of whack that only people voting for Gore had hanging
    chads, or voted for the wrong person, or couldn't get to the polls, or
    had to wait in long lines. They interviewed one person who claimed that
    the poll worker told her she had actually voted for Bucannon when she
    meant to vote for Gore and then refused to give her a new ballot.
    Apparently not a single Bush voter accidently voted for Nader or had any
    problem with the ballots or had to wait in lines.

    Ed
     
    C. E. White, Nov 6, 2003
  18. Wasn't it the corrupt democrats that tried to illegally alter the results
    of Florida? The final results were accurate and valid.>

    Actually it looks like the ORIGINAL results were accurate & valid!

    The Democrats proved their disegenuousness when they only wanted to recout
    three heavily Democratic counties. Worse, with a perfectly straight face
    they had Bill Daley act as their spokesperson! For those too young to
    remember, Daley is the son of the late Richard J. Daley, mayor of Chicago in
    the 50's & 60's. Daley stole the 1960 election for Kennedy, which had a much
    closer National vote count than 2000, only 100,000 difference. Daley's
    Democratic machine created massive voter fraud, people voted twice, dead
    people voted, Hell, dead people's DOGS voted. Hence the old Chicago saying
    "vote early, vote often!"

    No, old Al Gore screwed himself and the entire Democrat party by what he
    did, and the public hasn't forgotten. By the way, Texas has only recently
    become a Republican state. The Democrats have controlled politics there
    since the 1870's, and their latest trick to keep from accepting reality was
    to LEAVE THE STATE! Some representation!
     
    Gerald G. McGeorge, Nov 6, 2003
  19. damn you gerald....will you let this useless thread die already?
     
    John T. Waisanen, Nov 6, 2003
  20. Thanks! Of course these are old arguments. Lloyd's arguments look like
    cut/paste jobs from previous posts he's made. He always says the same thing
    over and over. And he always degenerates to name calling....
    "right-winger", "fascist", "hate-monger", etc. or self-agrandizement being
    that he's such an intelligent guy....Phd and all.... "What are YOUR
    credentials?" or "Take a science class!". What's good about that is it's a
    chance for those of us on the other side of the idealogical divide to home
    in on a fixed target.

    Nonetheless, I believe he really enjoys it. He's been doing this for years
    and he always gets beat-up and then comes back for more!
     
    David J. Allen, Nov 6, 2003
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.