Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers

Right you are, the hypocrisy is incredible.

 

You know Lloyd, if they made a list of the one hundred dumbest people on
earth, you name would be in every spot.
If I have something in 1990, and I don't get rid of it, then yes, I will
still have it in 2003. Saddam had them, he never provided any evidence that
he destroyed them, so yes, he still has them to this day until and unless
proven, PROVEN, otherwise.
Where are they? Well hidden, he had twelve years to do so, they may be
buired in the desert, he may have transfered them to another country, until
they are found we won't know. The fact that they are unaccounted for makes
it imperative that we keep looking until we do know where they are, or if he
in fact did destroy them, and simply hid that fact in an attempt to bluff
us, which is what Hans Blix is suggesting. A suggestion, I might add, he
would not have made if he and the inspectors knew they had been destroyed,
which is what you claimed, thus proving you once again a lying asshole. You
really should be taking classes instead of teaching them, you have so much
to learn.

Not at all. The claim he tried to aquire weapons grade Uranium from Nigeria
turned out to be a lie, but that does not equate to Saddam seeking to aquire
Nukes being a lie, that remains to be seen.

Ther ones he used? Ask the hundreds of thousands of people he killed with
them. The fact you are questioning this at all proves you a heartless
bastard who would murder your own family if you thought it would benifit
you. Your support of a Dictator who murdered for sport is sickening.

You know where they are you lying bastard. Pull your liberal head out of
Gores ass and think for yourself, you sound like a parrot.

And Clinton, and Clintons staff.

Which Clinton had nothing to do with. The economy was improving when Clinton
took over. The current recession, however, began thanks to Clinton. The more
you post, the more people see your ignorance for themselves. Keep it up.

 

As opposed to your left wing sites heh?

 

Nope, still just you Lloyd.

 

The same Ted Kennedy who murded that girl at Chappaquidik and used his name
to get off.

 

We know your here Lloyd, you don't need to introduce yourself every time you
post.

 

Lloyd tries hard to never post facts, because then it is harder for him to
lie his way out of it. Of course when confronted with facts he can't lie his
way around he simply doesn't respond.

 

Yep, that's what every post you make is.

 

Yes, your very proud of your foolish ideas, lets see you actually counter it
with some facts. You can't do it.

 

I wish you would learn some science Lloyd, then you wouldn't come in here
spouting your left wing propaganda you heard from your Sierra Club buddies.
What peer reviewed Scientific journals do you read Lloyd, and where can I
read your published articles in peer reviewed journals? Until you answer
this your still just an individual with nutty ideas that are always proven
wrong when you post them.

 

That's all you ever post Lloyd, I'm still waiting to hear what ariticles
you've had published in peer reviewed journals, and which ones you read for
your information. Are you really so ashamed of the journals you read that
you are afraid to post them?

 

More like saying if you get cancer you will die from it, ignoring all the
cancer survivors out there. But you ignore all facts that don't agree with
what you already believe. You are not a scientist, you are a parrot.

 

Not man enough to admit you were wrong are you LP.
That's OK, I knew you were a fraud from your first post. Now all of Usenet
knows it.

 

I've been waiting since Carter for the Democrats to run a candidate worth
voting for. Clark looked like a possibility this time but he is quickly
killing his chances.
He needs to stop the Bush bashing and start promoting his own ideas, people
are sick to death of negative campaigns. Odds are looking good at the moment
for a Bush victory in 2004, but alot can happen in a year.

 

Hehee. I really need to stop reading this thread. Tonight is my last time,
scouts honor. Nice meeting you to BTW.

 

Yes. Read every post I've made LP, I've answered this a dozen times. You're
the scientist, you tell me. If an item is created, and is not destroyed in
anyway, does it still exist?
Your like the little kid who keeps saying "why" everytime it gets an answer,
no matter how thorough the answer is, until the parent finally has enough
and states BECAUSE I SAID SO!.
LP, BECAUSE I SAID SO!!. Now shut up and go to bed, you wish to act like a
child I'll treat you like one.

 

More like saying if you get cancer you will die from it, ignoring all the

"Lloyd want a CRACKER? Rawk!"

 

This is the worst crop of candidates the Democrats have yet to put forward.
Worse, their attacks on the President and national policy coming at a time
of war, articulated for personal partisan gain, are reprehensible and a
disgrace to the name of their political party. Never in history have we seen
a major political party so devoid of vision and so obstructionist in its
actions.

None of them has even a remote chance of beating Bush in '04, but in the
process of all this they give true aid & comfort to the most despicable of
enemies. (As a former liberal Democrat and McGovern campaign worker, I
remind people I know losers when I see 'em.) Clark is nothing but a
chameleon, running as a Democrat because he can't run as a Republican.

The sad part is these assholes have nothing to put forward, except "tax the
rich" (which really means tax anyone making enough to afford a roof over
their heads) and "cut & run", proving they're nothing but cowards at heart.
Imagine the total chaos in the middle east if we were to knee-jerk and pull
out our troops at this time. But, if they gained power in the process, what
would these selfish idiots care? Every Democrat since FDR has left a major
world crisis for his successor to clean up.

The Democrats have not articulated a inspirational, constructive vision
since Kennedy & Johnson. Indeed, they have not implemented anything truly
effective (other than confiscating income) since the New Deal. Sad, but
unavoidable conclusion: they're so bound up in their special interest
obligations they can't step forward with anything coherent or relevant to
lead their country. As for Bush, Americans know a real leader when they see
one. He may have his flaws, but after 9/11 he passed the test with flying
colors.

 

Yeah, I'm out, too. Best!

 

October 30, 2003

And so will you, as long as you continue to crosspost to sci.environment.

Please remove sci.environment from your crosspost list.

It's way out of context to your discussion.

Thomas Lee Elifritz
http://elifritz.members.atlantic.net