Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers

Whats drivers ed?

No such thing here in school, but you have to pass a test to get the licence
here, and handling of trucks isn't part of it.

rhys

 

So you're saying that increased CO levels are NOT the sole reason for
"global warming" - because if they were, the earth would only now be
emerging from the ice age. Thanks for clearing that up for me, Lloyd.

 

*ONE OF* Hence it is not the same as your all inclusive statement.

Parker makes one last ditch effort with word play. You clearly ment the later
in your initial and followup statements.

You aren't grasping the entire context of what I wrote. With you I can't
tell if it's on purpose with your typical less than honest debate style
or if you really are that dumb. Go, back re-read, before you cut my initial
reply up and try to grasp the meaning of it. Everything that occurs with
the climate is claimed by global warming believers to be something that
supports the theory. Much like that other guy's cite tried to make
everything fit the bible, global warming believers try to make every bit
of odd weather fit the global warming, climate change scheme.

Yet, if someone where to post that a US cold snap was a sign of no global
warming, you and others would ream that person a new asshole and say he
didn't know the difference between weather and climate. When someone
blames some odd weather on global warming because it's hotter than normal,
true believers like you say it's "scientific facts and explanation".

I see you are too stupid to grasp a simple point. The point is the behavior
of global warming believers pretty much parallels creationists trying to
make everything fit the bible.

Theory != fact, and I am refering to the theory titled "gobal warming"
as you were initially. But if you want to play the same word games, wether
the temperature of the earth is going up, down, staying the same depends
on what measures you use.

Hey you fucking moron, why don't you sue the school the that sold you
a PhD? You don't have the mindset to be a real scienist. Maybe that's why
you haven't published jack shit, right parker?

Parker, we've been going back and forth for years. If you don't remember
then you're too stupid to even use google.

Do you believe that the greys are mind controlling Bill Clinton? Do you
beat your wife?

Is that the kind of lame bullshit you want to play with parker? I can play
that game too and play it better than you if I need to.

I know alot more than you already parker. Try playing some catch up.

 

It also started at the same time man started flying with heavier than
air machines. A real scienist knows better than to make statements like
the one above as "proof" as I demonstrate with another thing that started
at the same time and has increased since.

 

I see you haven't kept up with science. Otherwise you might be aware
of a couple things that would have stopped you from making such a
universal statement.

 

Yet I must point out that I've never heard any of these complaints in regards
to the Caprice, which had a stronger frame and a longer wheelbase (and rear
end).

--Aardwolf.

 

learning some science.<CLICK>Try learning some science.<CLICK>Try learning
some science.<CLICK>...........

Will somebody please kick the jukebox, somebody's playing that broken Parker
record on there again. ;-D

 

Try learning some science. Fool ! Try learning some science. Idiot ! Try
learning some science. Liar !!

Fixed it - he's rapping again

Dave Milne, Scotland
'99 TJ 4.0 Sahara

:
: : >
: > Try learning some science.<CLICK>Try learning some science.<CLICK>Try
: learning some science.<CLICK>Try learning some science.<CLICK>Try learning
: some science.<CLICK>...........
:
: Will somebody please kick the jukebox, somebody's playing that broken
Parker
: record on there again. ;-D
:
:
:

 

There have been warm times and cold times in the past, with different causes.
Do you think just because, say, exercise raised your body temperature last
week, a virus could not be doing it today?

 

We demanded Saddam to get rid of the WMD. It appears he did.

 

Suburban -- 132 cu.ft. cargo space
Sienna -- 149
Town & Country -- 168

(From edmunds.com)

 

No, in something you don't know anything about -- science.

It's not name calling when it's an accurate observation.

 

Not in 2003.

Is he as big as the WMD?

So if they're found, that's proof Saddam had them. If they're not found,
that's also proof Saddam had them?

Not in 2003.

The UN inspectors destroyed them.

 

It agrees with the ages of everything from the stars, to trees from rings.
Sorry, but I cannot give a complete course in chemistry in a usenet post.
That's like asking to prove relativity exists, or quantum effects.

To a creationist, I guess someone who says 2 + 2 = 5 qualifies.

 

Tell us your scientific credentials, oh cowardly one. Your degree, your field
of work. I won't hold my breath though.

 

Mine, and NASA, IPCC, NOAA, EPA, National Academy of Sciences, American
Geophysical Union, American Chemical Society...

There is none.

Yeah, and you're such a scientist, right? Tell us your degree.

 

No, they're the reason NOW. Do you suppose things may have different causes
from time to time? Do you suppose your computer might not work today because
of a virus whereas it might not have worked last week because of a faulty
chip?

 

If you look at the data (I know that's a foreign concept to you), global
warming began around the middle of the 19th century, as human combustion
activities started picking up.

 

I see you haven't learned any science.