Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers

Read what Anthony Principi, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, has to say
about VA healthcare:
http://www.fra.org/mil-up/milup-archive/8-01-02-milup.html

 

No, the VA is not a for profit system.
This is actually a result of the gov't failing to follow through on
the contract it made with servicemen.
Why people think the same gov't will follow through on a similar
contract with all citizens is beyond me.

 

I never said I'd prefer anything else.
And I never even hinted that I wanted to impose my religious beliefs
on others.
I point out a fact, and you immediately try to make me say something
else. Typical of you when something you don't like is said.
Why not just admit that you're wrong instead of putting yourself in
the position of looking so dumb?

 

Lloyd lives in a fantasy world where everyone adheres to his set of
preconceived notions.
It's obvious that he has very little experience of life outside the
hallowed halls of Emory.

 

"whatever those may be..."?
You use it as an example, but don't know what it is?

 

Alabama
Colorado
District of Columbia
Georgia (if created before 1/1/97)
Idaho (if created before 1/1/96)
Iowa
Kansas
Montana
New Hampshire (for inheritance purposes only)
Ohio (if created before 10/10/91)
Oklahoma
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
Texas
Utah

So doesn't this contradict "But there are no tax benefits to "civil
unions", no inheritance benefits, no insurance benefits, etc."?
Why, yes, it does.
If you want to say something, Lloyd, try to make it a little more
right. You will have a much easier time, and it will be much harder to
prove you wrong.

 

I am not sure who wrote this but whoever did does not know dick about
steam turbines or power plants! Yes I do. Been there done it!!

 

By your own definition, your own posts are no less "abuse". Pot calling the kettle black.

 

x-no-archive: yes

And everybody else does?

 

Agreed.

 

Nonsense! The consitutional convention was on June 19, 2002. Whether or not the
legislature is in session NOW has no bearing. The Senate had a constitutional
duty to vote on the amendment. Instead the constitutional convention was brought
to order and adjourned within mere seconds. Yay or nay vote on the amendment,
that is all that was needed. After this travesty, the President Senate's approval
rating plumeted to the basement, even in liberal Massachusetts. He should have
been able to easily win governor, instead he came in a very distant third in just
the primary.

 

I believe it would be better than VA system only because of limited
voting potentional of those who use the VA system. A low voting /
lobbying power means they really get the shaft at budget time.
Significantly better? Probably not, just good enough that people
wouldn't elect 3rd party types to federal office. Just so they
stay with the two parties.

But I can say one thing for sure, it would cost people a whole lot of
money in new and increased taxes.

 

It's a matter of public record. Try U.S. Congressional record. Oops -
since I cited that, it must be a right wing organization.

It's a fact that it happened. You can deny it all you want. Just
because you probably won't find acknowledgement of it from liberal
organizations doesn't mean it didn't happen. However I suspect you
could find some mention of it even there - kind of hard to ignore the
elephant in the room so to speak.

Oh - what the heck. Here are some sentences from the article iteself:
"In October of 1993, pressure from American right-wing groups and
politicians began to be exerted on ILGA to kick out its pedophile
organization members. The US Mission to the UN asked ILGA to
'disassociate itself from NAMBLA and other affiliate organizations'
whose 'objectives are not consonant with the UN's human rights
activities'.

"In November of 1993, the executive committee declared that ILGA
'condems pedophilia', contrary to some past resolutions on the matter,
and asked NAMBLA, Martijn, and Project Truth to resign voluntarily from
ILGA. None of the groups agreed to do so. On the 15th of November,
NAMBLA issued a press release reaffirming its membership in ILGA.

"On June 23, 1994, at the Annual Conference, NAMBLA, Martijn and Project
Truth were expelled from ILGA, on the motion of the executive committee,
and it was decided that 'groups or associations whose predominant aim is
to support or promote pedophilia are incompatible with the future
development of ILGA'.

"On the eve of the 25th anniversary of the Stonewall riots, the event
that sparked the contemporary gay and lesbian movement, the NAMBLA
Bulletin was released in a brown paper format to rally support for
NAMBLA and so-called 'boy love' organizations within the gay community.
Due to the pressures facing NAMBLA, its members organized a group called
the Spirit of Stonewall (SOS), which gathered the endorsement of some
figures and organizations in the gay movement. Despite threats of
arrest, 50 NAMBLA members and 200 supporters, including Harry Hay,
marched under the banner of SOS."

So you're going to refute the above information from that article? I
suspect, with your connections in certain "communities", you would have
not trouble confirming the facts as stated above. Just handwaiving them
away due to whatever intellectually dishonest diversion you want to
throw out won't make them not a matter of record. I think the case is
made rather completely.

(my comment in brackets above to re-introduce honesty into the
discussion)
Glad you agree that it would be strange for liberals to speak out
against systematized support of pedophilia. Notice my comment was
clearly in the context of the support of gay rights organizations who
worked a deal with the U.N. to support and endorse pedophilia around the
world. But that is a good observation that organizations with a liberal
agenda would not speak out against pedophilia (until publicity concerns
dictated that they to do so lest their more attainable agenda items be
jeopardized).

Give it up, Lloyd. It's clear to anyone who is honest what happened.
You can deny it all you want. It happened. Get over it. You're only
drawing attention to it and making your buddies look bad. Best to leave
it alone, but I really don't care beacuse the more people become aware
of that kind of crap, the more exposed you and your kind are.

Bill Putney
(to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with "x")

 

Ah - you must be referring to Nancy Pelosi's (sp?) husband.

Bill Putney
(to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with "x")

 

Must've come out of Emory. They used the movie "Deliverance" as the
basis for their study. Can you squeal like a pig, Lloyd?

Bill Putney
(to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with "x")

 

X-no-archive: yes

 

NYSE ADRs are listed on NYSE by definition! And not only are you wrong now, you
also said that "DC stock *IS* still listed on the NYSE, as is no other stock of

Which of course are all LISTED on the NYSE, contrary to your claim!

"DC stock is still listed on the NYSE, as is no other stock of a company not
headquartered in the US