Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers

Please stop abusing groups with your cross posts.

Mike

 

Please stop abusing groups with your cross posts.

Mike

 

Please stop abusing groups with your cross posts.

Mike

 

You made a statement, I proved it wrong. Still skirting (no pun
intended).

Not sure what your point is, but, whatever.

Bill Putney
(to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with "x")

 

Damn right!
I want the right to use womens' restrooms!

 

Would you please demonstrate that no one in your particular newsgroup
(whichever one it is) is contributing to this thread (besides you, of
course).

 

You've never heard of common law marriage?

 

Do you get to speak for rthe Jeep+willys newsgroup?
You have not yet demonstrated that no one who uses that newsgroup
responds here, or that no one there wants the thread to continue.

 

Please stop abusing groups with your cross posts.

Mike

 

The word is "too", not "to".
Why do *you* get to determine when "too long" is?

 

I have a friend who went to the Doctor for a routine physical. The Doctor
did not like whaat he saw on the treadmill test and checked him into the
hospital, where he had a balloon angioplasty that same afternoon. How long
would he have waited "on the list" in Canada for the same treatment,
considering he was outwardly healthy and active. Would he have lived that
long? How could he have been sure?
I know if I need medical treatment I can get it, NOW, now later. To me, that
is important. I really don't care how Canada does it, if you're happy great.
I'm just against Lloyd and his cronies trying to change ours, which would
stifle it, and lower the quaility of care for everyone, including Canadians.

 

Depends on how you look at it.
The government is made up of 'the people'.
Those people's lives are, at least in part, shaped by their religion.
To expect their government to be completely divorced from that
religion (whatever religion it is, or even the combination of
religions it is here) is being unrealistic. It's asking the people to
ignore what they believe in.

It is a goal of our government, at this time, to attempt to divorce
itself from all religion. Is that good?
How can we expect our government to come up with laws that have no
base? No anchor at all? How can we possibly expect to base our laws on
the human experience, and then expect to deny a large part of that
experience?

I'm not proposing a theocracy, but I do think that trying to deny all
religious beliefs is simply impossible, and, as such, should be
recognized.

 

No more than your's is of the US. I'm happy with ours, you're happy with
your's. Now we just need to shut Lloyd up and we can all die happy.

 

I'm glad I don't have to wait six months for treatment of a condition that
worsens with time.

 

I've been saying just that that.

Let's not confuse some Catholic churches with the whole of religious
society.

Ok, I have a problem with unreferrenced pronouns.
What is the "it" here?
Marriage? Gay marriage? The idea of gay marriage?
The rankling?

 

I think that's already covered.
Such unions are called 'corporations'.

 

Non sequitor.

Try going into one and find out.
Are you *really* this dumb?

It's discrimination, based on age.
Or do you think differently?

 

Oh yeah? Read it and weap:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Lesbian_and_Gay_Association
Here's another good one: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NAMBLA

A matter of public record - part of the Congressional record, no doubt.
You wanna dispute that?

I suppose you'll say that the Wikipedia is run by a right wing
organization. Notice how many times on the article it says that right
wing groups and politicians opposed the goings on of the gay community
in the situation - not once does it mention liberals as being
particularly outspoken about the UN's endorsement of such groups (and
the gay rights orgs. only acted when they saw that the publicity was
damaging their other "more palatable" causes).

Bill Putney
(to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with "x")

 

How about a man and his dog - why shouldn't they be allowed to get
married?

Bill Putney
(to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with "x")