Headlamp bulbs - -96 LHS

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Itsfrom Click, Jan 18, 2007.

  1. Itsfrom Click

    Bill Putney Guest

    That's due to poor implementation of a good idea for cost cutting
    purposes (designing in inadequate relays).

    Bill Putney
    (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
    address with the letter 'x')
     
    Bill Putney, Jan 22, 2007
    #21
  2. Itsfrom Click

    Ken Weitzel Guest

    Hi Paul...

    It amazes me that anyone would even consider a single relay...

    For the price (to an automaker) of a relay and socket, why in the
    world wouldn't they use two?

    Take care.

    Ken
     
    Ken Weitzel, Jan 22, 2007
    #22
  3. Hi Bill,

    I'll try to remember that when they haul away my cold, dead body from
    the twisted wreckage. ;-)

    Cheers,
    Paul
     
    Paul M. Eldridge, Jan 22, 2007
    #23
  4. Itsfrom Click

    Bill Putney Guest

    Yeah - they'll put on your tombstone: "Here lies Paul - but we saved
    $0.03 on the relay!".

    Bill Putney
    (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
    address with the letter 'x')
     
    Bill Putney, Jan 22, 2007
    #24
  5. Itsfrom Click

    Bill Putney Guest

    The problem isn't the number of relays - one is fine if its contacts are
    designed for the required current. That would cost less than two of
    lower current rating *AND* be reliable.

    Bill Putney
    (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
    address with the letter 'x')
     
    Bill Putney, Jan 22, 2007
    #25
  6. Hi Ken,

    I'm sort of surprised as well. I recall the relay controlled the low
    and high beams as well as the fog lights, so when you turned on the
    high beams, the fog lights automatically shut-off (no doubt to prevent
    excessively high current draw and the blinding of oncoming traffic).
    If it were possible to incorporate a "fail" mode that would still
    provide at least some light until the engine was turned off, that
    would have made my trip through the great state of Maine a whole lot
    more enjoyable.

    Cheers.
    Paul
     
    Paul M. Eldridge, Jan 22, 2007
    #26
  7. Itsfrom Click

    Ken Weitzel Guest

    Hi Bill...

    But with one, corroded contacts (at the socket), or an open coil, or
    dirty/corroded contacts at the switchpoint leave you totally in the
    dark; whereas two would at least leave one headlamp burning.

    Let me tell you (shamed facedly) of what I did when I was young and
    stupid. (now I'm still stupid, but have elder moments to blame it on :)

    Bought one of those 3 in 1 meter kits. Being young and invulnerable I
    installed it quickly; bundled nicely the 4 wires and oil pressure tube,
    stuck them through an opening in the firewall, hooked them up, all was
    good so away I went...

    Later that night... on the infamous highway 401, just west of Toronto.
    Far enough from Toronto that there were no highway lights, but close
    enough that there was still lots of traffic.

    First - thought my foot was on fire. Incredible pain. A few seconds
    later everything electrical quit. Engine stopped, *all* lights went
    out. Incredible fear.

    Saving grace was only that it was a standard, the starter still worked,
    so I "drove" myself onto the shoulder with the starter motor.

    What I'd done was hooked up the ammeter sloppily, it went to ground,
    burned a hole in the oil tube (foot on fire), and eventually opened
    up leaving me invisible, blind, and dead in the water.

    Doubt there's anyone else stupid enough to do that, but makes me think
    a lot about light wiring.

    Take care.

    Ken
     
    Ken Weitzel, Jan 22, 2007
    #27
  8. Itsfrom Click

    Ken Weitzel Guest

    Hi Paul...

    Darn! In the last message I admitted to being a victim of elder
    moments, but you on the other hand have hit the nail right on the
    head!!!

    All that needs to be done is to parallel the relay switched/heavier
    wire system with the older original system. As long as the relay
    operates well there'd be virtually no effect, yet if the relay failed
    for whatever reason, you'd automagically fall back on the OEM stuff.

    Fantastic!

    Take care.

    Ken
     
    Ken Weitzel, Jan 22, 2007
    #28
  9. Hi Bill,

    You may have hit upon the crux of the problem. I had been driving
    several hours with my high beams on, as the secondary roads through
    New Brunswick and Maine were completely deserted at the time; perhaps
    high current draw over an extended period of time contributed to its
    failure. The relay was located above the front passenger wheel well
    and I wonder if long term exposure to heat and road grime/road salt
    could have been contributing factors as well. Then again, Sharon
    mentioned BOSCH relays were known to have problems during those years,
    so perhaps I was simply twice blessed. Who knows?

    Cheers,
    Paul
     
    Paul M. Eldridge, Jan 22, 2007
    #29
  10. Hi Ken,

    That's so typical! The one time in my life f-n brilliant and I
    completely missed it.

    Cheers,
    Paul
     
    Paul M. Eldridge, Jan 22, 2007
    #30
  11. Itsfrom Click

    Bill Putney Guest

    Ahh - yes - redundancy/fail safe. Well - it's all a compromise between
    cost and functionality. We've touched on 3 philosophies:
    (1) Marginal (inadequate) relays that are guaranteed to fail on a
    relatively high number of vehicles in the first 2 to 5 years (the
    present design philosophy).
    (2) One relay that is designed with an adequate safety factor to put us
    way on the high end of the failure bell curve.
    (3) Two properly designed relays (adequate safety factor) to give the
    redunadancy that you mentioned.

    Perhaps a decent philosophy that an MBA could live with would be use (2)
    on lower end vehicles (cheapskates), and use (3) on higher end vehicles
    (SUV's, Democrat elites). :) We probably all agree that (1) is
    unacceptable for any vehicle.

    Bill Putney
    (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
    address with the letter 'x')
     
    Bill Putney, Jan 22, 2007
    #31
  12. Itsfrom Click

    Bill Putney Guest

    Hmmm! I like it. However, if you were the corporate lawyer, you might
    rather the failure disable the lights and cause a reasonable person to
    pull over and get off the road rather than be tempted to continue
    driving with a crippled system and possibly start a fire with wiring
    that engineers and lawyers (and judges and juries) both would agree
    would be inadequate.

    Bill Putney
    (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
    address with the letter 'x')
     
    Bill Putney, Jan 22, 2007
    #32
  13. Hi Bill,

    I was wondering about this myself, but wouldn't that 99-cent fuse be
    sufficient to keep all those class-action lawyers at bay?

    Cheers,
    Paul
     
    Paul M. Eldridge, Jan 22, 2007
    #33
  14. Itsfrom Click

    Ken Weitzel Guest

    Hi Bill...

    Dang, I've confused apples and oranges again. It's my specialty, and
    I'm good at it :)

    I was thinking more along the lines of those of us (me, for sure) who
    are going to add relays to our existing cars.

    Prior to Paul's revelation, I was going to add relays, driving the coils
    with the existing headlamp wires. And of course the battery to the
    relay contacts, and in turn on to the bulbs.

    Now, instead, I'm going to simply "steal" the coil supply from the
    existing wiring, and leave the rest all intact. Then I'll add the rest.

    The result (unless this is another senior problem) should be that the
    voltage drop to the bulbs will virtually disappear while the relays and
    heavier wiring do their job, but - if the relay fails for whatever
    reason the lights will continue to operate. Operate exactly as Chrysler
    designed them, and governments approved them, so perfectly legal.
    (excepting only whatever additional drop arises from a few mils to pull
    in the coil, if it still pulls in).

    Be interesting to hear Daniel's opinion.

    Take care.

    Ken
     
    Ken Weitzel, Jan 23, 2007
    #34
  15. Itsfrom Click

    Bill Putney Guest

    I don't see any problem in doing ti the way you describe it, Ken.

    Bill Putney
    (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
    address with the letter 'x')
     
    Bill Putney, Jan 23, 2007
    #35
  16. Itsfrom Click

    Bill Putney Guest

    So relay fails and you want the lights to run directly off of the
    control wiring with a fuse in it that's guranteed to blow at that point?
    Not sure I'm following.

    Bill Putney
    (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
    address with the letter 'x')
     
    Bill Putney, Jan 23, 2007
    #36
  17. Hi Bill,

    Sorry, I realize I didn't express myself all that well. What I wanted
    to say is that the fuse should (hopefully) blow in the event of a
    serious fault (e.g., overload or electrical short), thereby reducing
    the likelihood of major damage to the vehicle's electrical system; I
    didn't mean to imply power be re-routed to the headlights via the
    control wiring if the relay should fail.

    The real question I would like to ask is this: If the relay fails, can
    we devise a way for the headlights to remain on, at least until the
    car's ignition is turned off, provided the fuse does not kill power
    altogether.

    Cheers,
    Paul
     
    Paul M. Eldridge, Jan 23, 2007
    #37
  18. Itsfrom Click

    Bill Putney Guest

    Either use your idea of paralleling the control wiring and size it so it
    can carry the load without burning up, or redundant (parallel) relays.
    IMO, the K.I.S.S. method would be to use a single name brand relay with
    contacts rated for 50% (100% preferred) more current than what the real
    load is - that would give you close to maximum reliability at very small
    cost increase.

    Bill Putney
    (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
    address with the letter 'x')
     
    Bill Putney, Jan 23, 2007
    #38
  19. Itsfrom Click

    Steve Guest


    Well, if conditions are such that you CAN use the high-beams, you
    shouldn't have the fogs on at all because (obviously) there is no fog.
    If there is oncoming traffic, you shouldn't have the fogs on at all...
    unfortunately 99.9% of the people on the roads these days turn the
    *@#^!ing fogs on every time they turn the headlamps on :-/
     
    Steve, Jan 23, 2007
    #39
  20. Itsfrom Click

    Steve Guest

    Well, when I converted my '66 to relays (and Cibie headlamps) I wired it
    with a fuese and relay for low beam and a separate fuse and relay for
    high beam. If the low beams fail, I can at least kick on the highs until
    I can pull over and either a) swap fuses, b) swap relays, or c) bypass
    the relay and run direct on the switch (not desirable, but better than
    darkness!)
     
    Steve, Jan 23, 2007
    #40
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.