GM-Chrysler merger? Maybe not.

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Pete E. Kruzer, Oct 20, 2008.

  1. Michigan worried about possible job losses.
    U.S. and Canadian union leaders against a merger.
    This has an interesting graph of auto-industry job
    losses since 2000. I'd be even more interested in
    seeing a graph for, say, the last 50 years.

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122445891509348563.html



    GM may be unable to get financing to swing the merger.
    This is since the paper was printed last night. I'm
    not an online subscriber, so I was only able to read
    the first two or three sentences of the article.

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122447134901349421.html
     
    Pete E. Kruzer, Oct 20, 2008
    #1
  2. Pete E. Kruzer

    MoPar Man Guest

    Supposedly GM does not want to give up it's half of GMAC to Cerebus.

    So how lucrative is GMAC, given that you can't lease a car any more, and
    there are plenty of no-interest-for-5-years deals floating around. How
    much money is there in car financing these days?

    Does GMAC finance anything besides GM products?

    And still nobody here can explain the logic behind raising / borrowing
    money to buy a company with money in the bank.

    If GM tells Cerebus to pull it's $11 billion out of Chrysler's bank
    account, doesn't that mean GM would need $11 billion *less* to buy
    Chrysler? Wouldn't that be an easier deal to swing?
     
    MoPar Man, Oct 21, 2008
    #2
  3. Pete E. Kruzer

    Lloyd Guest

    Actually they're one of the biggest financers of ... mortgages!
     
    Lloyd, Oct 21, 2008
    #3
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.