GM, Chrysler May Get Bankruptcy to Protect U.S. Loans (Update1)

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Jim Higgins, Feb 9, 2009.

  1. Jim Higgins

    Jim Higgins Guest

    GM, Chrysler May Get Bankruptcy to Protect U.S. Loans (Update1)
    http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=atjQ8fjgT.kY&refer=home

    Feb. 9 (Bloomberg) -- General Motors Corp. and Chrysler LLC may have
    to be forced into bankruptcy by the U.S. government to assure repayment
    of $17.4 billion in federal bailout loans, a course of action the
    automakers claim would destroy them.

    U.S. taxpayers currently take a backseat to prior creditors, including
    Citigroup Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Goldman Sachs Group Inc.,
    according to loan agreements posted on the U.S. Treasury’s Web site. The
    government has hired a law firm to help establish its place at the front
    of the line for repayment, two people involved in the work said last week.

    If federal officials fail to get a consensual agreement to change their
    place in line for repayment, they have the option to force the companies
    into bankruptcy as a condition of more bailout aid. The government would
    finance the bankruptcy with a so-called “debtor in possession” or DIP
    loan, a lender status that gives the U.S. priority over other creditors,
    said Don Workman, a partner at Baker & Hostetler LLP.

    “They are negotiating to see if they can reach an agreement,” said
    Workman, a bankruptcy lawyer based in Washington. “If not, they are
    saying ‘We are pretty darn sure that a bankruptcy judge will allow us’”
    to be first in line for repayment.

    GM shares traded in Germany rose 2.5 percent to the equivalent of $2.91
    as of 12:07 p.m. in Frankfurt. Ford Motor Co., the second-largest U.S.
    carmaker, advanced 0.5 percent to $1.95. Ford has declined government
    bailout funds so far.

    Carmaker Opposition

    GM and Chrysler have dismissed calls to reorganize under bankruptcy
    protection, saying a Chapter 11 restructuring would scare away buyers
    and lead to liquidation. GM and Chrysler are working toward a Feb. 17
    deadline to show progress on a plan put in place as part of the U.S.
    loans received in December from the Troubled Asset Relief Program. They
    must reduce labor costs and show how they will repay the money by next
    month.

    GM and Chrysler are already trying to restructure out of court, cutting
    labor costs, reducing debt levels and eliminating dealers. GM is in
    talks to pare $27.5 billion in unsecured debt to about $9.2 billion in a
    swap for equity.

    The company said it plans to shut dealers and reduce obligations to a
    union retiree health fund by half to $10.2 billion in a separate equity
    swap. Chrysler Chief Executive Officer Robert Nardelli has said his
    company will also try to cut debt levels.

    Delphi Talks

    GM said today it’s in talks to take back parts of Delphi Corp., a parts
    supplier the automaker separated from a decade ago, in order to maintain
    portions of the supply chain. The automaker is also considering
    additional plant closures, job eliminations and pay cuts for
    administrative workers, a GM official said.

    The automaker probably will close at least two factories and Chrysler
    will temporarily shut three, the Wall Street Journal reported, citing
    people familiar with the matter. The General Motors closures may include
    a truck plant in Pontiac, Michigan, and the Chrysler shutdowns will be
    in Michigan and Canada, the newspaper said.

    January sales from automakers plunged 55 percent at Chrysler, 49 percent
    at GM and 40 percent at Ford.

    The government has the option of working out an intercreditor agreement
    outside of bankruptcy that would give it rights to some collateral ahead
    of other creditors. Such agreements, often made when money is lent to a
    company that already has liens on most of its assets, are usually
    negotiated when the loan is made.

    U.S. Law Firm

    Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP is advising the government on how to
    make sure it gets paid back first, including by way of intercreditor
    agreements, the people involved with the talks said. The law firm, hired
    last month, is working for the government with Sonnenschein, Nath &
    Rosenthal, a Chicago-based firm with capital-markets experience, and
    Rothschild Inc., an investment bank, the people said.

    The issues are “extremely complex,” said Bruce Clark, a credit analyst
    at Moody’s Investors Service.

    The existing loan agreements appear to give the banks a superior
    position to the government, Clark said.

    “The ultimate position of the government could end up being determined
    by whatever concessions various creditors make, and the determination of
    a bankruptcy court if it ever gets there,” he said.

    When the automakers were lobbying the government for assistance,
    lawmakers made a point of saying that the government must be assured
    that if the companies failed, taxpayers wouldn’t lose the investment.

    Existing Lenders

    Workman said the U.S. couldn’t force its loans to supersede existing
    secured lenders, so it built in a measure that allowed the debt to be
    converted to debtor-in-possession financing.

    “A carrot and stick approach is spot on,” he said.

    As it stands, the government loans fall below existing debt secured by
    most assets for Auburn Hills, Michigan-based Chrysler and Detroit-based
    GM. Prior lenders have first position on some assets. The government has
    first position on assets not already pledged.

    Chrysler has $7 billion in loans from a group of banks, including New
    York-based JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs and Citigroup. It also has $2 billion
    in loans from owners Cerberus Capital Management LP and Daimler AG.
    Cerberus owns 80.1 percent of Chrysler. Daimler owns the remainder.

    GM has $6 billion in loans secured by assets from lenders including
    JPMorgan and Citigroup. JPMorgan spokesman Brian Marchiony, Goldman
    Sachs spokesman Michael Duvally and Citigroup spokeswoman Danielle
    Romero-Absilos declined to comment.

    Lori McTavish, a spokeswoman for Chrysler, declined to comment beyond
    confirming the primacy of the bank loans. GM spokeswoman Renee
    Rashid-Merem and Treasury spokesman Isaac Baker declined to comment.

    Unless the automakers show by March 31 that they will be able to return
    to profit and repay the money, the government can demand return of the
    loans.
     
    Jim Higgins, Feb 9, 2009
    #1
  2. I hope the UAW realizes that destroying the companies will be worse
    than a few concessions for them down the road. Then again maybe they
    figure the Gov't will rather bail them out than keep the companies up,
    maybe establish a UAW jobs bank even if the companies close, funded by
    taxpayers? That has to be their reasoning because I can't see what
    they are thinking otherwise.

    BTW another Atlantic City Casino company is filing for bankruptcy and
    revenues are way down. A little while ago the UAW took control of the
    Casino workers' unions too. You can't make this stuff up.
     
    David E. Powell, Feb 17, 2009
    #2
  3. Jim Higgins

    MoPar Man Guest

    Yes - it's Donald Trump's company that filed chapter 11 today. Trump
    owns something like 30% of the company. 3 casinos in Atlantic city.

    Trump was against the decision, but they couldn't make a $40 million
    interest payment. Trump said something like "now lawyers and
    consultants will drain the life blood from the company".
     
    MoPar Man, Feb 18, 2009
    #3
  4. Jim Higgins

    Bob Shuman Guest

    Bob Shuman, Feb 18, 2009
    #4
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.