Feds End GM/Chrysler Warranty Guarantees

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Jim Higgins, Jul 21, 2009.

  1. Jim Higgins

    Jim Higgins Guest

    Feds End GM/Chrysler Warranty Guarantees
    http://tinyurl.com/n34y7j

    In prepared testimony before the House Judiciary Subcommittee, Car
    Czarlet Ron Bloom revealed that the government would no longer back GM
    and Chrysler warranties. “With the successful emergence of the new
    companies, consumers can now feel assured that the companies have the
    financial wherewithal to meet their warranty commitments on a continuing
    basis,” Bloom said. The $641 million spent by the government on the
    warranty program has been returned to the Treasury with interest,
    reveals Bloom. “This achievement represented a prudent short-term use of
    taxpayer funds,” was his conclusion. GM spokesfolks tell Automotive News
    [sub] that The General never even tapped the fund, while Chrysler reps
    are mum on the subject.

    Bloom also tackled the tricky subject of the dealer cull. “Consistent
    with the Task Force’s role, we were not involved in the design or
    implementation of New GM or New Chrysler’s dealer rationalization
    plans,” he said. “We were not involved in any individual decisions about
    dealers, and we do not intend to be going forward.” But, but, but . . .

    the companies have engaged recently with several members of
    Congress—including members of this subcommittee—about potential
    additional modifications of their review and reconsideration processes
    that would further increase transparency and objectivity for everyone
    involved. We have been supportive of this process, in our role as a
    facilitator, to ensure this process is transparent, fair and objective.
    However, the Administration strongly opposes the amendment to the
    Financial Services appropriations bill that attempts to restore prior
    Chrysler and GM franchise agreements.

    Why?

    Political intervention of this nature could also jeopardize
    taxpayer returns by making it far more difficult for the companies to
    access private capital markets if there is ongoing uncertainty about
    whether Congress will intervene to overturn judicially approved business
    decisions anytime that it disagrees with the judgments of the companies.

    Some strong opinions there for a “facilitator.” But Bloom clearly feels
    that the stakes were high enough to justify his task force’s tough
    stances. Not that there aren’t some signs that Bloom (or Obama) has some
    doubts about the intervention. Bloom concludes

    In a better world, the choice to intervene would not have had to be
    made. But amid the worst economic crisis in three-quarters of a century,
    the Administration’s decisions avoided a devastating liquidation and put
    a stop to the long practice in the auto industry of kicking hard
    problems down the road. The Auto Task Force worked quickly to assist GM
    and Chrysler and did so in a fair and open way. While difficult for all
    stakeholders involved, these transactions provide New GM and New
    Chrysler with a new lease on life and a chance to succeed.

    Ron Bloom Testimony (Treasury.gov) »
    http://www.treas.gov/press/releases/tg222.htm
     
    Jim Higgins, Jul 21, 2009
    #1
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.