?? Does the "Tornado fuel saver" really work ???

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Jp, Nov 22, 2003.

  1. Ok, so you can't explain it. I understand.

    Matt
     
    Matthew S. Whiting, Nov 26, 2003
    #21
  2. Did a Google search. Didn't find much. A post in a rec.autos.tech in
    1998 and one in rec.crafts.metalworking, neither of which gave anything
    close to a definition. Maybe I could review the next 20 pages of Google
    and find something, but most likely not. What I saw in these two posts
    hardly qualifies as a definition.

    Matt
     
    Matthew S. Whiting, Nov 26, 2003
    #22
  3. Jp

    Neil Nelson Guest

    And now you think you're entitled to a refund, or what?

    I'll tell you what, since your crying is causing the eyelets of
    my work boots to rust, we'll just call it even.

    If you're still confused; everything you need to know about how
    atmospheric air enters an automove engine will be covered in
    tonights weather report on your favorite local TV channel.
    Pay particular attention to the fact that the weathercaster does
    not use the word "suck" during the entire report.
     
    Neil Nelson, Nov 26, 2003
    #23
  4. Jp

    Rick Merrill Guest

    Not true! In the midwest they say "this weather sucks".
     
    Rick Merrill, Nov 27, 2003
    #24
  5. Jp

    Bill Putney Guest

    What do you call what a baby does to a bottle or a tit?

    Bill Putney
    (to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
    address with "x")
     
    Bill Putney, Nov 27, 2003
    #25
  6. No he is pointing out that people who sit in glass engines should
    not throw pistons.

    Ted
     
    Ted Mittelstaedt, Nov 27, 2003
    #26
  7. Jp

    Neil Nelson Guest

    Actually, we say "if you don't like the weather, wait 5 minutes,
    it will change."
     
    Neil Nelson, Nov 28, 2003
    #27
  8. Jp

    Neil Nelson Guest

    My point exactly.
     
    Neil Nelson, Nov 28, 2003
    #28
  9. Jp

    Neil Nelson Guest

    I've been sitting in glass engines for over 30 years and haven't
    thrown a piston yet.
     
    Neil Nelson, Nov 28, 2003
    #29
  10. Jp

    Bill Putney Guest

    Huh! I thought your point was that the word "suck" has no meaning
    whatsoever in the English language and therefore can't be used to
    describe creating a tendency to move a gas or a liquid from one place to
    the other by creating a pressure differential. I claim that it is a
    prefectly good word to use to describe how a baby gets milk and how air
    gets pulled into (through, whatever) an engine.

    Just what is your point - I'm certainly not seeing it. The word "suck"
    has a meaning, and IMO it describes the creation of vacuum (pressure
    differential) and the subsequent pulling of air into an engine.

    Bill Putney
    (to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
    address with "x")
     
    Bill Putney, Nov 28, 2003
    #30
  11. Jp

    Neil Nelson Guest

    Please, continue believing what you want.
     
    Neil Nelson, Nov 28, 2003
    #31
  12. Bill, your definition is a good working definition and I use it as well.
    Neil has offered nothing better.


    Matt
     
    Matthew S. Whiting, Nov 28, 2003
    #32
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.