Detroit auto makers try some new tricks

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Ed, Sep 15, 2007.

  1. Ed

    C. E. White Guest

    But it was not sold as an Opel (even though it was). My next door
    neighbor had one. As far as I know it never broke, but then she was
    very old and the car was only driven about once a month.

    Ed
     
    C. E. White, Sep 27, 2007
  2. Ed

    C. E. White Guest

    Actually, you have it backwards, the current Opel GT is a rebadged
    Saturn Sky / Pontiac Solstice. The V-6 powered Vues use the Opel V-6
    for the first 2 or 3 years, then switched to a Honda V-6. The current
    Vues are back to GM engines. In the early 00's GM and Honda had an
    engine swapping arrangement - GM provided diesels in Europe to Honda
    and Honda sold V-6 drive trains to GM for use in Saturns.

    One thing about the Opel GT - it should not really be called a "GT" at
    all, at least as this designation was originally used in Europe. GT
    was short for Grand Turismo, which were generally coupes, not
    convertibles. Of course Ford, GM, and all other US manufacturers slap
    letters wily nilly on cars, so I guess GT has no real meaning these
    days. ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gran_Turismo_(racing) )

    Ed
     
    C. E. White, Sep 27, 2007
  3. Ed

    who Guest

    But as we see when two SUVs with little crumple zone hit one another the
    people in both vehicles are often seriously injured.
    A high percentage of todays vehicles are large SUVs with little crumple
    zone.

    Then there is the single vehicle accident situation when you hit a hard
    object, but you will never do that will you!
     
    who, Sep 27, 2007
  4. Ed

    who Guest

    So true.
    Of course it's better not to wear a seat belt when on a motorcycle or
    perhaps even when in a convertible without a roll bar.
     
    who, Sep 27, 2007
  5. Ed

    who Guest

    It didn't in the early 80s implementation.
    The early Chrysler Horizons had shocks supporting the bumper bar.
    I was rear ended hard twice ('81 Horizon) with no more damage than a
    scuff on the plastic bumper cover.
    The easing of regulations resulted in more fragile bumpers that are
    trashed in slight bumps.
     
    who, Sep 27, 2007
  6. Ed

    Mike Marlow Guest

    No - we don't see that at all. If you're going to make things up, at least
    make up an accident scenario where what you claim is likely.
     
    Mike Marlow, Sep 27, 2007
  7. Ed

    Steve B. Guest

    Who is we? I don't see this scenario. I see more hurt people come
    from the small car vs SUV scenario where the small car gets clobbered.
    SUV vs SUV doesn't seem to result in any more injuries than car vs
    car.

    In my post that you quoted I said that I would rather be in a new car
    if I was going to hit a brick wall. Just in case you haven't noticed
    brick walls are hard objects.

    Steve B.
     
    Steve B., Sep 28, 2007
  8. Ed

    Ed White Guest

    Pintos did not have gas tanks like "old Mustangs." Old Falcons and
    Fairlanes did (assuming you are talking about the drop in style tanks
    where the top of the tank forms thebottomof the trunk floor). Pinto
    gastanks wereinstalledfrom below and there was a seperate steel trunk
    floor. Neither Mustangs nor Pintos were particularly fire prone no
    matter what the urban myths claims.

    People are always talking about olf Mustangs with the drop in tanks
    like they were esppeically dangerous.How about old Corollas where the
    tank was mounted in the trunk? Or Camry's where the tank sseems to
    have a propensity for rusting out on top and leaking?

    Ed
     
    Ed White, Sep 28, 2007
  9. Ed

    Ed White Guest

    You don't have this quite right, but it is close. The Henry Ford Motor
    Car Company went backrupt. The principal investors took possesion of
    the assest and hired Henry Leyland to run a new company, eventually
    called Cadillac. I don't think you can say that the original name of
    Cadillac was the Henry Ford Motor Car Company, although certainly
    there is a connection. I don't think Mr. Leyland ever was the
    principal owner of Cadillac, although he certainly was the early
    managing force. Henry Leyland did found Lincoln, which Henry Ford
    eventually purchased and then forced out Henry Leyland (and son). A
    lot of historians paint this as sort of a revenge play by Henry Ford.

    Ed
     
    Ed White, Sep 28, 2007
  10. Ed

    Ed White Guest

    GM management always seemes to ignire the fact that Oldsmobile existed
    before GM. GM was born in 1908 (ten years after Oldsmobile) and
    initially was just a holding company for Buick. The early history GM
    is just a bunch of stock manipulation used to accumulate other
    manufacturers (including Oldsmobile). GM under Durant even tried to
    buy Ford. Supposedly Ford was ready to sell, but only for cash. Durant
    had no cash, only inflated stock. Ford said no deal.

    Ed
     
    Ed White, Sep 28, 2007
  11. Ed

    Ed White Guest

    You haven't been to a body shop lately have you. :)

    Ed
     
    Ed White, Sep 28, 2007
  12. Ed

    aarcuda69062 Guest

    You haven't been in an accident lately have you? (no smiley)
     
    aarcuda69062, Sep 28, 2007
  13. Ed

    n5hsr Guest

    Now you've got me thinking and I can't remember something. Wasn't Ford
    (1903-present) Motor Company Henry's 3d car company? Seems to me like there
    was a car company before Henry Ford Motor Company.

    Charles of Schaumburg
     
    n5hsr, Sep 29, 2007
  14. Ed

    n5hsr Guest

    You haven't seen what hospitals charge, have you?

    Charles of Schaumburg
     
    n5hsr, Sep 29, 2007
  15. Ed

    Wickeddoll® Guest

    "n5hsr" ...
    I just got my statement ("This is not a bill") on my cardiac stress test -
    $5,500! That's just the treadmill test itself - not even the doctor's fee!

    What a ripoff.

    Natalie
     
    Wickeddoll®, Sep 29, 2007
  16. Ed

    n5hsr Guest

    And have you seen the price of drugs lately? They're trying to get rid of
    quinine, which is a naturally occuring substance, so they can't really
    charge a ton for it. But the drug companies have been trying to get rid of
    quinine since the 1990's. They try to give dialyis patients Robaxin, but it
    doesn't work on me or my dad. (I think Robaxin is some sort of muscle
    relaxant.) Next they'll try to get rid of asprin. Now I can only get some
    artificial quinine substitute that costs me $110 a month, whereas before the
    quinine I took cost less than $10 a month.

    Charles of Schaumburg
     
    n5hsr, Sep 29, 2007
  17. Ed

    n5hsr Guest

    Like Big Bill Teague said after he knocked out the two guys in Oh Brother
    Where Art Thou, "It's all about the money, boys."

    Charles of Schaumburg
     
    n5hsr, Sep 29, 2007
  18. Ed

    Bill Putney Guest

    Find a good herbalist that carries quinine bark and white willow
    (natural aspirin the way it used to be obtained before they learned how
    to make it synthtically).

    We should always have those available in the U.S. unless Hillary and
    Teddy get there way on outlaewing herbal medicine (which I don't think
    will ever happen).

    Bill Putney
    (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
    address with the letter 'x')
     
    Bill Putney, Sep 29, 2007
  19. Ed

    n5hsr Guest

    They'll try. Big Pharma has been trying to stick the Quack label on herbal
    medicine since probably 1906.

    Do you know the most common medicine to control diabetes in India?
    Cinnaomon! I had an Indian doctor friend tell me as much. A lot cheaper
    than the dollar-a-pill stuff they had me on, and for me, it actually works.
    My numbers are almost too good.

    Charles
     
    n5hsr, Sep 29, 2007
  20. Ed

    Wickeddoll® Guest

    "n5hsr"...
    Yet men gladly pay $10 a pill for Viagra :)

    The substitute for quinine is usually Neurontin or Lyrica these days.
    Sometimes the antidepressant Cymbalta is used as well.

    Quinine, unfortunately, becomes tolerant to the patient, then stops working.
    It also can have a few side effects (like anything).

    I don't know much about dialysis-related meds, but it seems weird to use a
    muscle relaxant in someone with kidney failure.

    Natalie
     
    Wickeddoll®, Sep 29, 2007
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.