Consumer Reports rates minivans

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Art, Feb 8, 2005.

  1. Yeah, yeah, I *know*, Nate. You've made some kind of a compact with the
    devil that lets you get amazingly reliable and long service out of VWs.
    Those of us who've made no such deal are in a different situation
    entirely.
    McDeath still sells the Big Mac.
    Strong? Who said anything about "strong"? The question concerned the
    overall quality of engineering and reliability of the hardware.

    DS
     
    Daniel J. Stern, Feb 14, 2005
    #41
  2. Yeah, and Paul T. managed to make 2.6s run well and last. And Hemi A. has
    some ungodly number of hundreds of thousands of miles on the 3.0 in his
    minivan. *shrug*
    As I was saying...
    As you were saying...
     
    Daniel J. Stern, Feb 14, 2005
    #42
  3. Art

    Nate Nagel Guest

    Exactly, and I've had exactly two issues with engine internals in over
    10 years of driving VWs with the same basic engine - a burned valve on a
    newly-acquired 1.8 16V that had been sitting a long time and had a
    spotty maintenance history, and some worn rod bearings on a Corrado G60
    (which apparently was due to VW using a new type of bearing for that
    motor which was supposedly stronger, and which was easily rectfied by
    dropping the pan and replacing with the standard bearings)

    Really, the only major issues with VW drivetrains that I'm aware of that
    can be attributed to VW (I'm not counting things like the recent
    ignition coil fiasco or the window regulator thing, which were supplier
    issues and would have been a non-issue were their dealer network not
    populated by combusting rectums) are the fact that the G60 supercharger
    is essentially a maintenance item - you rebuild it every 80K miles - and
    the close-ratio 020 transaxles were missing a c-clip that caused them to
    grenade at about 120K miles or thereabouts (the regular wide-ratio
    trannys are apparently OK, however.)

    Of course, we can agree to blame VW for their shitty heater cores, I'm
    totally with you on that one. There's no excuse for heater cores that
    fail every 8-10 years like clockwork on a well maintained car.

    nate
     
    Nate Nagel, Feb 14, 2005
    #43
  4. Art

    Comboverfish Guest

    Yeah, sounds like the Renault Alliance, Defiance, Appliance, etc. Oh
    wait... you said every 8 to 10 years. I thought you said every 8 to 10
    months.

    Toyota MDT in MO
     
    Comboverfish, Feb 15, 2005
    #44
  5. I'll concede the point that the *basic* engine and _manual_ transmission
    are fine. The stuff that gets bolted on and draped around the basic
    engine, OTOH...and the automatic transmissions...
    I remember getting the recall card for the heater core fittings on our '90
    Jetta. Seems they "could" fail and cause a high pressure/high-temperature
    leak...directly onto the driver's feet.
     
    Daniel J. Stern, Feb 15, 2005
    #45
  6. Art

    Comboverfish Guest

    The Renault Alliance/Encore recall notice said, paraphrased, that its
    heater core could rupture and spray hot coolant on the occupants legs,
    scalding them. I'm sure this did happen to some unlucky people, but
    everyone else suffered a heater core that weeped coolant just enough so
    that you could always smell it. Usually a couple months after
    replacement. Those cars were cool in a lot of ways for the time, but
    the coolness was more than offset by the godzilla sized shit designs of
    virtually every system on the vehicle.

    Toyota MDT in MO
     
    Comboverfish, Feb 15, 2005
    #46
  7. Well...yeah, I guess if you cross your eyes and squint and maybe take
    large quantities of thoughtfully-combined pharmaceuticals, "zero to sixty
    in forty-five minutes" is cool in a lot of ways ;-)
     
    Daniel J. Stern, Feb 15, 2005
    #47
  8. Art

    Art Guest

    Yep they left out the engine. But weren't they the ones with pedastal seats
    in the front so rear passengers had more leg room? That was a decent idea
    for a small car at the time. And I thought the hood shape was interesting.
     
    Art, Feb 15, 2005
    #48
  9. Art

    Comboverfish Guest

    interesting.

    Yeah, the seats could move more ways than most modern power seats,
    including the "astronaut move". And just like every other inovation or
    standard feature they brought to this compact econo car class, it was
    with glaring fault. I saw the left side seat tracks rip apart when
    heavily used (delivery people, etc) causing the driver to flip into the
    passenger seat on a sharp turn. I'm sure you can agree that's
    dangerous.

    Every theoretically nice feature on these festering, moist, piles of
    dung was plagued with mass failure rates.

    Toyota MDT in MO
     
    Comboverfish, Feb 15, 2005
    #49
  10. Art

    Geoff Guest

    About here is where ol' Lloyd would pick up the CR torch.

    Did he die or something?

    --Geoff
     
    Geoff, Feb 17, 2005
    #50
  11. Art

    Steve Guest

    Probably finally realized that he doesn't have much reason to post here
    since he hasn't owned a Chrysler product in years.

    Or got fired and lost his free internet access through Emory :p


    But hey, we've got Glickman as a replacement. And if nothing else at
    least he's less predictable than Yoid was...

    ;-)
     
    Steve, Feb 18, 2005
    #51
  12. Art

    Geoff Guest

    Talk about being damned with faint praise!

    =:-O

    -Geoff
     
    Geoff, Feb 18, 2005
    #52
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.