Chrysler may end PT Cruiser production in two years (Sun-Sentinel)

http://www.ng2000.com/fw.php?tp=chrysler

08/15/2007: ROYAL OAK, Mich. Chrysler LLC said Tuesday it will build its iconic PT Cruiser at least through 2009 but made no promises after that, fueling speculation that the stylish retro wagon hurt by a recent slump in sales could be on its way out.

 

iconic PT Cruiser at least through 2009 but made no promises after that,
fueling speculation that the stylish retro wagon hurt by a recent slump in
sales could be on its way out.
1) Chrysler reports a drop in sales of the PT Cruiser

2) Automotive know-nothings immediately assume the PT Cruiser will be
discontinued

3) Chrysler says "we have no plans to discontinue the PT Cruiser for the
next 2 years at
least"

4) Know-nothings immediately demand Chrysler to promise there will be no
changes in
their model line up for the next decade

5) Chrysler says "how should we know what the market will do 3 or 4 years
from now?"

6) Know-nothings claim this is proof that the PT Cruiser is on it's way out.

My question is why do the automotive reporters even bother with the press
releases
at all? Whay don't they simply fabricate whatever they want to say out of
thin air
and report that? Since that is what they are doing anyway.

Ted

 

If they intend to produce a real PT Cruiser in 2010 and beyond work had to
have started at least two years ago. Let's hope the new company has a few
tricks up its parts box.

Richard.

 

Its had a FANTASTIC run. It wouldn't be a failure even if they did pull
the plug in 2 years. Compare that to the HHR, which was a flop from the
get-go....

 

I'm surprised they will keep it that long.
Must still be selling.

I hope they upgraded the low grade lighting switch that bugs my friend.
He can't use his fog lamps he paid extra for and Chrysler has no fix for
his PT.

 

I love my 01 Limited! There are so many design choices the design team made
that are just right. It has been very reliable, but for the typical crap
sway bar bushings and links, cured by Energy brand replacements.

All they needed to make the cruiser the perfect vehicle for the time is to
have significantly improved its fuel economy. By now the PT Cruiser should
sport from the factory the follwing:

1. Significantly higher quality all season tires such as the Goodyear Triple
Tread.

2. Significantly improved front and rear sway bar links and bushings.

3. Significantly improved disk brakes with ceramic pads.

4. Stability Control.

5. Better seats, radios and GPS options.

But nooooo. The guys in the suits just kept removing content and opting for
a corporate look to the dash and front end. Either I'm dead wrong or the
guys in the suits should be shot.

Richard

 

All I would like is better than the 25.5 mpg highway I get on the
interstate (non turbo engine with 3 people in car) and rear seats that
were lighter weight. They always feel too heavy when yanking them out
for a "stuff piled to the roof" run.

 

My '95 Chrysler had my favorite tires: Michelins.

Only needed for excessive speed or drunk driving.
If driving normally requires it that driver should be a passenger.

Got great seats and radio. I wouldn't want a built in GPS as I want to
use one when I travel and rent a car or even when walking.

I upset a friend of mine, when discussing his PT quality problems.
I said it is Chryslers low end car, which did upset him, but another
friend present supported me. No matter how dolled up a PT is, it's still
Chryslers bottom end vehicle which is built to meet a low price point.

Honda and Toyota seem to maintain quality in their bottom end vehicles.

 

IMHO the 2006 and up redesign models rival any Toyota/Honda low end models.
I've had a 2001 PT and then bought a 2006 14 months ago. The 2006 is quiet
and very solid- has only been to the dealer for oil changes so far. I
really think it is one of the best quality and fit/finish vehicles Chrysler
offers- and I'm comparing it to my 05 Pacifica and 06 Town and Country
minivan.

 

You've only had your 2006 PT for a short time.
So initial quality is OK, but long term takes 5+ years to start
evaluating the longer term, 7+ years to really know it.

 

who wrote:

I disagree on several counts.

For one thing, the PT Cruiser has for the most part shown EXCEPTIONALLY
good reliability, fit and finish, and overall quality.

In the second place, its never been a "low-end" car, but a niche market
vehicle. The Neon, Cirrus/Stratus, and now the Caliber are the "low end"
cars."

 

It's based on a low end car, simply dolled up.
That won't make it a higher end car. It's problems illustrate that.

 

Please write 100 times on the blackboard:

"The PT Cruiser is not built on a Neon platform"

Except, of course, that your experience is far from the norm.

 

You need to open your mind to the sad facts on this troublesome car:
http://www.ptcruiserproblems.com/

http://www.ptcruiserproblems.com/chrysler/pt_cruiser/pt_cruiser_problems_
the_full_story.htm

http://www.carcomplaints.com/Chrysler/PT_Cruiser/2001/

http://www.ptcruizer.com/repairs-pt-cruiser.html

http://askmeaboutmyptcruiser.blogspot.com/2004/08/lemon-law-step-1.html

 

Are you trying to do a Bush on the facts?

http://www.ptcruizer.com/ptcruiser-development.html

 

That depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is, you moron.

Bill Putney
(To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with the letter 'x')

 

The PT Cruiser is not based on ANYTHING. The PT Cruiser is one of the
few vehicles made that is truly standalone platform, unrelated to
anything else in the product line. And it has never been problem-plagued
in any sense of the word.

 

You need to open your mind to the sad fact that you can find websites
exactly like those for ALL cars. Hell, there are probably more of them
for sludge-engined Camrys and transmissionless Odysseys right now than
there are for PTs!

Mechanical things break. And nitwits that think they're somehow
magically entitiled to never having a breakdown will write pissy blogs
about it.

 

You'd trust a website that can't spell "Cruiser?"

NONE of the "facts" above are correct. The original minivans weren't
built on Reliant platforms, either.

 

Hey Joe - I just wanted to make sure you realize that my comment was not
aimed at you.

Bill Putney
(To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with the letter 'x')