Chrysler: Introduce Tire Options

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Nomen Nescio, Jan 15, 2005.

  1. Nomen Nescio

    Nomen Nescio Guest

    I get most of my new car info from Consumer Reports. I especially like the
    spec page which itemizes details of interest to sophisticates.

    Aspect ratio of tires are getting lower and lower, folks! Even among
    "economy" models, I've seen them as low as -55.

    Does Chrysler actually think they are going to sell the older crowd cars
    which appear as though they're riding on the rims? I'm not even in that
    catagory, but resist these lower profile tires. I'm not alone either, from
    what has been posted in the recent past.

    What I know is this:

    Lower profile tires do not enhance "handling". As area of the tire
    footprint increases, its unit area pressure decreases in proportion, thus
    traction is a constant. (Traction = area x coefficient)

    Wider footprint cause a problem with alignment. The center of pressure of
    the footprint "wanders" thus no well defined point can be established for
    setting caster and camber. This results in built-in directional
    instablity.

    Low ratio tires leave little for deflection. If the car is run over an
    obstacle, damage to the carcass and rims is more likely to occur.

    There are at least a dozen other problems related to low profile tires.
    The optimum ratio is -80 with -90 running closely behind.

    So, why doesn't D-C offer a choice? Isn't that what free enterprise is all
    about?
     
    Nomen Nescio, Jan 15, 2005
    #1
  2. The Old America is going down the tubes, did you not say in a recent thread?

    DAS
     
    Dori A Schmetterling, Jan 15, 2005
    #2
  3. Nomen Nescio

    KaWallski Guest

    You are on drugs.

    My Durango with Goofy 15 inch tires from goodyear wallowed All over the
    frikken road. It is and Was simply scary to drive.

    The 17" on the R/T models is/were better.

    I put 45 series 20" Toyo Proxes that are less than 1 percent different in
    hieght (thus no Speedo error) on the truck and was simply amazed at how well
    the truck felt, drove and cornered.

    When Winter came around and I stuck the factory wheels with 15's back on I
    was scared driving the thing cause it was such a sloppy drive.

    Don't tell me low profile is not better - it is just a function of finding
    the right tread, sidewall height and combination. Granted I would not take
    the Durango off road with lower profile street tires. Nor would I go over a
    6 " deep pothole.

    The area of contact was similar to original but only due to SHAPE of tire -
    not the profile.

    Get Real Norm.
     
    KaWallski, Jan 28, 2005
    #3
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.