Chrysler in the UK

I think, as American cars go, Chrysler is the most original.

Chevy is just a rebranded Daewoo car. Daewoo cars are just bad Asian
cars. Checy thinks that by buying out the company and adding the ole
bowtie emblem will make ppl buy them. Nope, it just aint happening.

Ford..is dull ole Ford. Theyre everywhere. Focuses are just so plain.

But i have seen a 300c, and, cripes, what a car! And seeing a Ram
ploughing its way down a small country road being cautiously followed
by a tiny little Peugeot is just too funny. They Brits arent used to
such an imposing vehicle, other than a bus or a transport truck. So, i
could only imagine the poor ole person looking up at the Ram in front
of him.
Im an ex-Canadian ..and umm...dont ask what i drive. But im used to
seeing a Ram around.

Of course, the Voyagers are a dime a dozen, and the odd Neon shows up
and the PT Cruiser is plentiful.

cheers..eh... lol

 

Montag, 19. Juni 2006 15:05 (US Central Time)
mudpucket wrote in rec.autos.makers.chrysler:

Besides being bad asian cars ... Daewoo is only Chevy, because some jerks at
GM headquarters thought it would be a good idea to promote Chevrolet in
Europe.
That stupid idea will (or already has) backfire(d). A similar stupid idea
would be ... DaimlerChrysler wants to promote the Smart in the US and puts
the label "Dodge" on it. Nobody would see how one would grab life by the
horns when driving a Smart ...

Talk to you later ... Hans from Germany (75 to go)

 

is that what there doing? That not very..smart..

 

Montag, 19. Juni 2006 16:08 (US Central Time)
mudpucket wrote in rec.autos.makers.chrysler:

As far as I know ... DC is thinking of bringing the Smart to the US, but
under its own name.

Talk to you later ... Hans from Germany (75 to go)

 

I had a look at a few of those bottom end Chevs, very outdated under the
hood.

Yes the Focus is outdated, both the body and mechanicals.
However Ford is doing very well technically in their recent NA cars such
as the Fusion, but they are covering their nice mechanicals in dull
boxes.
Ford seems a bit confused, They replaced the Taurus with the Fusion,
after the boxy heavy 500 wasn't accepted as it's replacement, but they
still sell the base Taurus sedan. Unfortunately they don't have a
replacement for the unique Taurus station wagon, the only NA mid sized
SW. So customers will have to go to Mazda for a Fusion (Mazda 6) SW.

I was just in the UK and my UK friends weren't very impressed with a
300C I identified in a south UK beach area. Black didn't help it as far
as they were concerned. My UK friends aren't into monster cars, except
one who has a Range Rover for he and his wife. The RR allows him to see
over the hedges in the country area where he lives.

Plus the Jeep Cherokee and Liberty.

Chrysler may have done with the Neon and the PT Cruiser as they did with
the 300; come out with a completely different body functionally which
will get new buyers, but may piss off the existing customers for that
Chrysler line.
-the RWD 300 definitely wasn't a replacement for the FWD LH and 300M
lines it replaced.
-the Caliber may not be a replacement for the Neon and PT Cruiser.

 

and not something like the Volvo V70? or wold you classify that as a
large car?

 

I'd love to know what a "south UK beach area" is. Somewhere in the
Caroilinas or Florida?

In Britain we have had the Jeep and Voyager for years, PT Cruiser for a
while. The others have started arriving, in particular the 300C.

The full Chrysler range has been available for a bit longer in Germany.

Two observations:-

1) I think Chrysler is relatively big in Europe cf GM & Ford USA because
they don't have manufacturing plants here. GM & Ford are very strong with
the European/international offerings.

2) 'Mainstream' Chryslers are being brought in for political reasons,
especially as D-B (Daimler-Benz) had 'merged' with Chrysler.

I would be really surprised if 300Cs and Sebrings ever grow beyond the
specialist I-want-to-be-different niche, especially as the prices here are
so much higher than in the US.

I spoke to a Sebring Cab(riolet) owner in Germany the other day. I had seen
the car for over a year near where I frequently stay and finally saw the
driver park. He certainly likes it and is a bit cheaper than its obvious
rival, the Merc CLK Cab. I hired one in the US some years ago and quite
enjoyed it, too, and I would not mind having one at US prices. That would
compensate for it not being quite up to the standard of the CLK (previous
model W208), eg, the roof mechanism. Otherwise space and comfort were
pretty good.

DAS

For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling
---

[...]

[...]

 

What are they charging for a 300C in Europe? And what does an E Class
Mercedes go for? I was in Amsterdam last year and all of the taxis were E
class Mercedes. In the US it would be inconceivable for a car as expensive
as a Mercedes to be used as a cab, most US taxis are mid priced cars or
small minivans which cost 1/3rd as much as an E class Mercedes.

 

In the US it would be inconceivable for a car as expensive
as a Mercedes to be used as a cab, most US taxis are mid priced cars or
small minivans which cost 1/3rd as much as an E class Mercedes.

A marketing decision was made by Mercedes and BMW to target the high end
market in North America, thus their products are loaded with options sold
here that sometimes are not even offered in Europe or Asia or Africa.

For example you can purchase a Mercedes or BMW in Europe with steel wheels,
no radio, no air-conditioning, a small motor and a manual transmission, low
end interior, small tires and manual windows.

In North America you get a larger motor, larger wheels made of an alloy with
so called performance tires, anti-lock brakes and stability control, leather
interior, power everything, a high powered radio and CD player. This is not
apples to apples but different products for different markets.

Heck, I remember my 1956 190SL Mercedes, a beautiful two seater sports car
with a 4 speed manual transmission, basic 4 cylinder motor, leather seats,
power drum brakes, a nice Becker radio, manual windows, manual steering, and
not even a fan for the heater. Those were the days.

Richard.

 

In short - yes.

Apples are not being compared with apples. In the early eighties I was
working for an international, US-owned company in Germany for a couple of
years. A number of us had the standard-issue company car, a Mercedes W123
200D for our level and work in the company. Very economical and a real
work-horse. One of the most reliable cars of the era. (Some employees did
not like them because of relatively poor performance even in the then
context.)
(Car costs are more than capital costs - depreciaton and servicing are far
more important, ESPECIALLY depreciation, often neglected by private buyers
plunking cash down, which many do in Europe.)

At some stage US management decided it was time for a cost-control/reduction
drive and they took one look at the German company cars, sucked air in and
forced a change to (petrol-engined) Audi 100s and the new (but physically
smaller) 190. I never saw the figures but we were all willing to bet costs
went up. American management did not (seem to) realise we were running 2-l
diesel engines rather than 3-l petrol engines. Plus it probably looked bad
to American shareholders that German employees were driving company MERCS in
difficult times.

Mercs in the UK also cost a bit more than in Germany, but some of that is
due to option-loading. Still, in 2001 I bought a Merc in Germany and drove
it over. Spec'ed it to UK levels because of resale value (added some other
options I fancied) and saved GBP 5 000 against the UK price. Actually I had
expected to save double that when ordering, but in the meantime Merc raised
the price of RHD cars in Germany and lowered prices in the UK.

The price changes were market-forced, I believe, because loads of people
were importing directly from Germany and other countries, resulting in lots
of unhappy UK dealers. There were Merc dealers in, e.g. Paris and
Netherlands specialising in this business, quoting UK-spec cars and
pre-arranging all relevant documentation. It was an extraordinary time.

Based on some official figures I estimated that in 2000/01 about 8% of ALL
passenger cars were privately imported from elsewhere in Europe, with a much
higher percentage among the more expensive cars. A neighbour of mine, for
example, bought a Porsche this way and saved maybe GBP 10 000. On a GBP
70/80 000 car that's not to be sneezed at. This neighbour told me that a
couple of guys had set up an car importing business and were going round his
merchant bank. Lots of the colleagues bought cars this way with their
bonuses. Paid a fee but saved stacks. I nearly got somebody else to get my
car and do the importation paperwork but in the end I decided to do it
myself. No big deal as I was going to Germany anyway.

As regards 300C pricing in the UK, look here:

http://www.chrysler.co.uk/chrysler/versions.aspx?id=248,17,,b

http://www.chrysler.co.uk/chrysler/index.aspx?vd=1&cc=IN0604102AA&keyword=chrysler uk

You may find engine options you don't see in NA, especially among diesels.
E.g. could not have a Jeep without a diesel in the range.

For prices in Germany go to the Chrysler Germany site.

For Merc just go to the national Merc sites, e.g. start here:
http://www.mercedes-benz.com/content/mbcom/international/international_website/en/com.html

Currency exchange rates:

http://mwprices.ft.com/custom/ft2-com/html-currency.asp?

http://finance.yahoo.com/currency


DAS

For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling

 

Yes IMO the V70 is large, as is the Ford 500 which I understand is on
the same platform.

 

No one has ever really accused GM of being "smart." Or of making great
products :-/

IMO, the whole entire bias against American cars is because people think
"GM" when they think "American car." I've always thought "Chrysler"
first and "Ford" second when I think "American Car," and therefore
Japanese cars have always seemed like inferior junk to me.

 

Hardly. You ask a brit, or a frog what he thinks of 'GM' and he'll go
"who?" you'd have to say "vauxhall/opel, saab" etc. ford they know
about, but they mostly have their own fords (like the focus, etc)
chrysler is the ones sold as american cars.

What euros think of when they think of american cars is large floart
riding cars, with huge engines and low power outputs, and piss-poor
handling. As a brit living in the Us, and having driven many american
cars, its pretty much spot on.

 

Nope, but an idea.

Very good.

I'd put Ford third.

Not true today, but was true for all but Toyota back in the 60s.

 

You drove the wrong American cars, likely GM or Ford.
I've had Chryslers since they went FWD and their FWD cars handle just
as well as the UK rental cars I drive every few years when I'm in the
UK.

 

Did you read what I said at all? Fords in europe are mostly different,
although they're starting to take over the US (focus, recent couger, I
think the new 'mercury montego is actually the ford mondeo introduced
in late 02) - the ford puma was voted ar of the year in 98 by Top
gear, by a pannel notoriously anti-american. Brits also don't know
about GM, to them (us) its a vauxhall. or maybe now a Saab.

So, what you're saying is that your chrysler drives as well as a
usually porly maintained car with lots of miles on - hardly a ringing
endorsement. (rental cars are always run ragged, no matter what the
country, its just basic economics) Having driven non-renal chryslers
int he US, and non-rental UK cars, and a lot of non-rental cars in
general, chryslers handling, and indeed that of ALL american models
(not euroepan moedls modified and brought to the US) seem to handle
worse - its mainly down to the soft suspension, and the slushbox
transmissionand the engine response sure doesn't help things.

Its not just FWD cars, corvettes (at last those of 3-4 years ago) felt
unbalanced, sloppy and fas refined as a wet fart. Almost drive a viper
the same day, except it broke down.

BBC's top gear is about as respected as you'll get for car reviews,
so..
http://www.topgear.com/drives/F6/A8/roadtestList/dateDesc.jsp for the
PT cruiser reviews

http://www.topgear.com/drives/F6/AA/roadtestList/dateDesc.jsp 300C

caravan/voyager -
http://www.topgear.com/drives/F6/A6/roadtestList/dateDesc.jsp

and the crossfire -
http://www.topgear.com/drives/F6/B1/roadtestList/dateDesc.jsp

pretty much all the reviews said they weren't very good to drive,
except the str-8 crossfire review, that said it was 'bacuse its an old
slk in drag'

I'm sure you can go find you the jeeps and stuff too if you want.

 

Pretty much spot-on BULLSHIT.

 

Interesting, since auto gear boxes are laregely an American invention and my
understanding was that most of them used in European cars, however
prestigious, actually had US-sourced gear boxes.

My impression is wrong, then?

DAS

For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling
---

[...]

[...]

 

You rent from the wrong places. I have often driven rental cars with
little more than delivery mileage on them (less than 1000 miles total).
And in many cases, since the manufacturers want to "manufacture" used
cars, they sell/lease to rental companies with deals that limit mileage to
such an extent that required maintenance is little more than oil changes.
So in this case "basic economics" means that the rental cars will be
almost like new.

 

i've worked on some large events, where you can have every rental
agency in a place like San Franssico out of cars. i've seen ohow mny
people drive them. ("Hey, we got the insurance, it doesn't matter
really if we stick 2 ton of stuff int he back,a nd then try for
burnouts" or my favourite, a jeep grand cherokee, in low range 4WD,
doing burnouts down the vegas strip, then back at the base camp, going
and doing donuts in the dirt.

People don't look after rental cars like they would their own.