Chrysler Don't Spinout Cars on TV Like Cadillac's SRX Commercial

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Nomen Nescio, Feb 19, 2004.

  1. Nomen Nescio

    Nomen Nescio Guest

    For a while the Cadillac SRX commercials were boss. AC/DC rockin' away
    made the commercials more entertaining than the TV shows they sponsored.

    But the latest one is downright frightening. First it starts off silent.
    The first time I saw it run, I thought my TV set was busted! Then at the
    end, the SRX spins out in a cloud of dust. This is scary. At least it
    stays upright; if they try that trick on dry, clean pavement, the sucker
    might flip over like most SUV types do, particularly if they are loaded to
    maximum gross weight with a near empty gas tank.

    Now don't think I don't like a few thrills. For thrills, you can't beat a
    buzz job or a loop in a Cub. But spinning out a car is not something you
    wish your best enemy to experience in his worst nightmare. There isn't
    much room on a road for a spinout before your leave the road and flip or
    spin into an oncoming Peterbilt. You'll likely cream out that $58,000 Caddy
    and put yourself, the old lady and the two brats in the back seat in the
    hospital. And you'll be stuck with about half the $100,000 hospital bill
    too, after all the copays and co-insurance. And think of the old lady's
    aches and pains for the rest of her life. She won't be rattling those pots
    and pans and swinging that mop like she used to. And you just about forget
    consortium too; you're going to get a lot of exercise with that right hand
    of yours for the next 30 years. Besides, after the insurance company
    patches together your mangled SRX, you'll be the proud owner of a pile of
    rubbish.

    Do you notice that every car commercial has the disclaimer, "closed course,
    professional driver"? To me this means if you buy that car don't expect it
    to drive like the demo because you will cream out yourself it you try.

    So, what kind of commercial would I like to see? How about a tour of the
    factory showing smiling workers assembling the car with love? How about an
    engineer extolling the virtues of advanced design that lesser cars can't
    match? How about an action movie showing the car going through its paces
    under perfect control? P.S. Cadillac knows that its almost impossible to
    get a car to spinout, even with their ancient technology rear wheel drive
    models like their SRX - their driver has to make some unnatural control
    inputs to make that nauseating drama to happen. The $64 question is, how
    did the stunt driver get the SRX to spinout in spite of the Stability
    Enhancement System which "StabliTrak" is supposed to prevent such
    out-of-control operation?

    General Motors actually knows how to make state of the art cars. After all
    they did build planes during WWII. Now if only they would apply some of
    that airplane engineering to their cars, maybe they could build an SRX that
    weighs less than a DeVille! Now that's nothing to brag about - the DeVille
    is a Wilshire Blvd. heavy metal (Pb) cruiser, not the super-sports road
    burner they would like you to believe is the SRX.
     
    Nomen Nescio, Feb 19, 2004
    #1
  2. | For a while the Cadillac SRX commercials were boss. AC/DC rockin' away
    | made the commercials more entertaining than the TV shows they sponsored.
    |
    | But the latest one is downright frightening. First it starts off silent.
    | The first time I saw it run, I thought my TV set was busted! Then at the
    | end, the SRX spins out in a cloud of dust. This is scary. At least it
    | stays upright; if they try that trick on dry, clean pavement, the sucker
    | might flip over like most SUV types do, particularly if they are loaded to
    | maximum gross weight with a near empty gas tank.
    |
    | Now don't think I don't like a few thrills. For thrills, you can't beat a
    | buzz job or a loop in a Cub. But spinning out a car is not something you
    | wish your best enemy to experience in his worst nightmare. There isn't
    | much room on a road for a spinout before your leave the road and flip or
    | spin into an oncoming Peterbilt. You'll likely cream out that $58,000 Caddy
    | and put yourself, the old lady and the two brats in the back seat in the
    | hospital. And you'll be stuck with about half the $100,000 hospital bill
    | too, after all the copays and co-insurance. And think of the old lady's
    | aches and pains for the rest of her life. She won't be rattling those pots
    | and pans and swinging that mop like she used to. And you just about forget
    | consortium too; you're going to get a lot of exercise with that right hand
    | of yours for the next 30 years. Besides, after the insurance company
    | patches together your mangled SRX, you'll be the proud owner of a pile of
    | rubbish.
    |
    | Do you notice that every car commercial has the disclaimer, "closed course,
    | professional driver"? To me this means if you buy that car don't expect it
    | to drive like the demo because you will cream out yourself it you try.
    |
    | So, what kind of commercial would I like to see? How about a tour of the
    | factory showing smiling workers assembling the car with love? How about an
    | engineer extolling the virtues of advanced design that lesser cars can't
    | match? How about an action movie showing the car going through its paces
    | under perfect control? P.S. Cadillac knows that its almost impossible to
    | get a car to spinout, even with their ancient technology rear wheel drive
    | models like their SRX - their driver has to make some unnatural control
    | inputs to make that nauseating drama to happen. The $64 question is, how
    | did the stunt driver get the SRX to spinout in spite of the Stability
    | Enhancement System which "StabliTrak" is supposed to prevent such
    | out-of-control operation?
    |
    | General Motors actually knows how to make state of the art cars. After all
    | they did build planes during WWII. Now if only they would apply some of
    | that airplane engineering to their cars, maybe they could build an SRX that
    | weighs less than a DeVille! Now that's nothing to brag about - the DeVille
    | is a Wilshire Blvd. heavy metal (Pb) cruiser, not the super-sports road
    | burner they would like you to believe is the SRX.
    |

    With today's digital imagery manipulation software, they can make those SUVs
    fly through the air in the commercials if they want. Some of what you're
    seeing isn't real...bet on that!
     
    James C. Reeves, Feb 19, 2004
    #2
  3. Nomen Nescio

    traderdad Guest

    Wait a second! The traction control systems can be turned off with the
    switch of a button. And I would guess its not too hard to swing mine around
    with the parking brake, if I really wanted to. The disclaimers about
    professional drivers on closed courses are so that Joe Smith does not try
    his first parking brake turn on a regular 2-lane road. I learned mine
    autocrossing, long before I bought my SRX.

    Oh, and the music is Led Zep, not AC/DC.

    Otherwise, nice post :)
     
    traderdad, Feb 20, 2004
    #3
  4. Nomen Nescio

    huffreport Guest

    Ummm, I am not aware of any airplanes (at least in terms of an entire
    aircraft) that Cadillac ever built. It IS true, however, that they built
    MANY parts for aircraft engines both before, and during, the war. These
    were for another GM division, called Allison. The engine was the Allison
    V-1710, and variations of it, were used in the P-38 Lightning, and the P-51
    Mustangs.... As a footnote, I believe it was design of the P-38 that
    inspired the fins on the 1948 model Cadillacs.....

    More than airplane engine parts, Cadillac was really focused on building
    tanks! How appropriate!.... Yes, Cadillac made a lot of M-5 and later, M-24
    light tanks, both of which were powered by dual Cadillac V-8s, with
    automatic trannies!.... In fact, I know a guy who has a New Old Stock V-8
    block (surplus) that he used when he restored his 1941 60 Special.... I
    don't think everything was the same, but with modification, I guess he got
    it to work.

    Kevin
    www.huffreport.com
    A Celebration of American Cars, Music, and Retro Culture

    wrote:
     
    huffreport, Feb 21, 2004
    #4
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.