Caravan rear shoulder straps don't catch in crash

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by temp409, Mar 25, 2006.

  1. temp409

    temp409 Guest

    Im trying to find out if in Caravan or in ANY vans if they do crash
    testing for rear occupants. Daimerchrysler seatbelt rep.,said call
    NHTSA ,I did ,girl answers she dont know, gave me email to ask someone
    still waiting for that reply. Daimerchrysler seatbelt issue guy says
    the same catching mechanism that is in front is in rear. I said" NO WAY
    jerk them something is different". He says the back dont catch because
    pendulum in back is heavier than in front. Seems not legit to me
    because The rear shoulder strap didn't catch in our wreck and daughter
    (12yrs) was badly injured setting behind drivers seat her shoulder
    strap didn't catch and her face slammed the handle on back of drivers
    seat. Jerk straps in Dodge caravan or durango in rear for yourself-
    NONE catch -but the front all catch perfectly though. Something wrong
    and needs recalled I think.
     
    temp409, Mar 25, 2006
    #1
  2. Don't be an absolute idiot, please.

    Of course they test rear seatbelts.

    Your belt didn't work - you need to give all the info to your insurance
    company and let them decide if they are going to make a claim against
    Chrysler for the medical bills.

    Many belts don't "catch" because they have an explosive charge that fires
    when the airbags go off and shoots a piston into the belt retractor to stop
    it. We can't tell you what type you have since you didn't bother to put
    what type of Caravan you have and what year it is.

    Ted
     
    Ted Mittelstaedt, Mar 25, 2006
    #2
  3. temp409

    maxpower Guest

    --
    Since you don't specify the year that question cant really be answered.
    There are 2 basic ways for locking a seat belt to prevent the belt from
    coming out. The first is the automatic locking retractor which prevents the
    belt from coming out after the occupant extracts the length of webbing.
    The second way is the Emergency Locking Retractor which only locks when the
    vehicles undergoes a high acceleration or deceleration.
    There is also a dual mode retractor. it has both locking mechanisms into one
    restraint. Chrysler uses the ELR and the Dual mode restraints.
    ELR can be bolted to the floor, seat, pillar or roof it uses a sensor that
    reacts off g-force during accel and decel and locks the mechanism to prevent
    the belt from coming out further.
    Dual mode belts have the g-force sensor and the automatic locking mechanism.
    Each belt uses a pyrotechnic device which is triggered simultaneously with
    the airbags to rapidly retract the seat belts in the event of air bag
    deployment. With the slack removed, the occupant's forward motion in an
    impact will be reduced as will the likelihood of contacting interior
    components. After an impact that deploys the airbags. This is what Ted was
    talking about BUT it has nothing to do with locking the belt. its design was
    to take out the slack, pull you away from the steering wheel or other seats
    or dash boards.

    Glenn Beasley
    Chrysler Tech
     
    maxpower, Mar 25, 2006
    #3
  4. temp409

    Hachiroku Guest

    And there is a recell to 1994.

    Chrysler is very good on recalls.
     
    Hachiroku, Mar 25, 2006
    #4
  5. temp409

    Punch Guest

    if this is true, and your daughter "was" wearing the belt get a lawyer and
    sue...
     
    Punch, Mar 25, 2006
    #5
  6. temp409

    Matt Whiting Guest

    First file a complaint with the NHTSA. I believe you can do this now
    via their web site. If enough comlaints are received on a given issue,
    it can help generate an investigation that can lead to a recall.

    My rear belts catch in my minivan. Occasionally they catch just driving
    down my driveway which is a little steep and if you hit a bump while
    going downhill, the kids often complain about the belt catching.

    Sorry to hear about your daughter. How is she doing?

    Matt
     
    Matt Whiting, Mar 25, 2006
    #6
  7. temp409

    maxpower Guest

    That's really stupid to imply that based on what you just read, you have no
    idea if this vehicle was wrecked and had any fault codes in the passive
    restraint system before this accident (assuming its a new model) you don't
    even know what year it is. And if the daughter was not sitting back in her
    chair at the time of the accident. (which im sure the OP will say she was).

    If she was leaning all the way forward and the seat belt was maxed out with
    her head at the back of the front seat how would you expect the seat belt to
    stop her from hitting it the seat?????
    Was there someone sitting in the front seat with it reclined back into the
    girl? (once again the answer will always be no)

    my opinion

    Glenn Beasley
    Chrysler Tech
     
    maxpower, Mar 25, 2006
    #7
  8. temp409

    philthy Guest

    did u take it in for the recall??? if not shame on u
     
    philthy, Mar 25, 2006
    #8
  9. temp409

    philthy Guest

    ted the pretenoners are for the air bag deployment only only not the rear
    seating
     
    philthy, Mar 25, 2006
    #9
  10. temp409

    temp409 Guest

    It was a 2001 Dodge caravan year dont really matter All caravans
    durangos do the same It must be a daimerchrysler problem. front catches
    perfectly Rear dont. Talked to Daimerchrysler he says ALL have same
    catching mechanisms in the front as in the rear I said NO WAY have you
    jerked them something is wrong. I said did you know ALL minivans Front
    and REAR pass the jerking test except Dodge and he said No, I dont go
    around jerking seatbelts .(and he is thier seatbelt guy) I said I bet
    you would if it was your daughter that just got her face smashed. Now
    I just think Ill Let a lawyer do the jerkinig for him. Not sure yet Im
    waiting for info in rear crash test of minivans. I dont think they have
    to test rear occupants not sure yet waiting for NHTSA to reply filed
    with them 3-11-06
     
    temp409, Mar 25, 2006
    #10
  11. temp409

    temp409 Guest

    NHTSA there I also notice other complaints of Dodge Durangos that will
    not catch IN ANY rear shoulder straps Chrysler repaired one for them
    then said they will have to pay to have others repaired. Hmmm, I wonder
    who will end up paying/?
     
    temp409, Mar 25, 2006
    #11
  12. temp409

    maxpower Guest

    --

    What recall are we referring to this time dirty?

    Glenn Beasley
    Chrysler Tech
     
    maxpower, Mar 25, 2006
    #12
  13. temp409

    Joe Guest

    I'm sorry to hear about that. They're supposed to work by inertia, with the
    pendulum. I'm not sure they're supposed to react to jerking.
     
    Joe, Mar 26, 2006
    #13
  14. Can you even do that? I thought that once you filed a claim with an
    insurance company that the insurance company takes over and files
    the lawsuits. It's called subrogation of claims. Why are you bothering
    Chrysler about this? You need to be taking care of your daughter and
    having your insurance agent run around trying to jerk seat belts and
    call lawyers to sue auto companies.

    Or, are we possibly dealing with an uninsured driver who has a 12 year
    old with a lot of medical bills, looking for a sugar daddy to pay them?

    Ted
     
    Ted Mittelstaedt, Mar 26, 2006
    #14
  15. temp409

    temp409 Guest

    Haven't spoke to my insurance guy about the issue yet but Im sure if I
    do decide to pursue it in court a lawyer will speak with him. I need a
    lawyer consult in the first place to know if I should let
    Daimlerchrysler have my vehicle and just to ask some questions and see
    what I should do. And no Ted , money is not a issue at all dont be
    nasty. Childrens safety is. If the belts are unsafe they should recall
    them. Im going to save people from going through what we did.
     
    temp409, Mar 26, 2006
    #15
  16. I think you need to talk to your insurance company and find out how
    they proceed, before making any assumptions about who a lawyer will
    speak to. Insurance companies typically don't lead in with a lawyer.
    You need to consult your insurance company first to ask questions, then
    decide if your going to file a claim or pursue it yourself.
    A recall isn't going to be triggered by ONE complaint. You need to
    file your complaint with NHTSA and let the process work.
    That's what I'm afraid of. Unfortunately, you seem to be unaware that
    sometimes the cure is worse than the disease.

    Do we really need tepid coffee from McDonalds because some stupid
    bitch burned herself by spilling it all over in the drive through? When she
    shouldn't have even been getting coffee in the drive through in the first
    place, let alone eating in her car? Like I really want to drive down the
    street with a bunch of other drivers occupied by eating and drinking
    instead of driving?

    It seems to me that an hour in a U-pull-it wrecking yard with a Caravan
    the same year as yours would satisfy your curiosity as to whether the
    rear belts in your vehicle should have "caught" or not. If you were to post
    here with pictures of a belt out of some wrecked car that clearly showed
    that there was no retractor mechanism provided by Chrysler, then I think
    you might get some interest. But for now I think most people are assuming
    that your belt simply malfunctioned. Machines are not infallable, after
    all,
    and it may suck when safety equipment malfunctions but it does every once
    in a while.

    You have chosen to live in the technological society, you drink water from
    a public water system, eat refrigerated food from a grocery store, I can't
    begin to count the amount of properly-running technology that your health
    depends on just by doing this, and all of it you have about as much control
    over as a flea does over a dog. As long as you keep choosing to live
    in the technological society, you will need to come to terms with the idea
    that there is always a chance that your life or the lives of your loved ones
    may be prematurely snuffed out by a failure of that technology. The chance
    is not very great, but it is there. And you can't do anything about it, nor
    can
    I, other than to completely reject that society and live up in the woods
    somewhere. There's people who have tried doing that, as a matter of fact,
    you might try reading the book Fatu Hiva by Thor Heyerdahl to see one
    couple's try at doing this, and how successful they were at doing it. Other
    than that, your just going to have to accept this as one of those things,
    and
    count your blessings that the injuries wern't more serious.

    Ted
     
    Ted Mittelstaedt, Mar 27, 2006
    #16
  17. temp409

    temp409 Guest

    Ya well I will have to call insurance guy tomorrow seems like good
    advice since I don't want a lawsuit anyway. I just want things to be
    made safe befour another child is hurt or killed. Already filed with
    NHTSA on the 11th others filed about Dodge durangos doing the same way
    Daimlerchrysler repaired first one then said they would have to pay to
    have the rest repaired. Daimlerchryslers gen3 latch defect and their
    history with all that seems totally disgusting, they just pay people
    off and don't recall and defend obviously unsafe equipment ,seems its
    all about money and not safety with them. NHTSA or IIHS have never
    done a FRONTAL crash test for minivans with REAR occupants- where the
    shoulder strap is most important, and I guess Daimlerchrystler knew
    that and cut corners putting the cheaper unworking shoulder mechanisms
    in the rear. Would be interesting to know how much they save by doing
    that.
     
    temp409, Mar 27, 2006
    #17
  18. Try getting in touch with the IIHS, they also do independent crash testing.
     
    Alex Rodriguez, Mar 28, 2006
    #18
  19. temp409

    temp409 Guest

    So I will I give up trying to save the world, Im tired, nobody cares
    about unsafe defective seatbelts until a wreck happens to them and its
    their own kids who are hurt anyway. I can not get seatbelts recalled
    under any circumstance even if they are proven unsafe you can go
    unsafebelts.com you can read daimlerchrystlers history with seatbelt
    Issues. Just tell everyone jerk front and rear shoulder straps of ANY
    caravan or durango you can see something is obviously wrong. Children
    will be hurt and maybe even die but I can do nothing more except post
    all over internet and newspaper. I posted this once already it must of
    got removed seems someone dont want you to know daimlerchrystlers
    history.:shakehead
     
    temp409, Mar 29, 2006
    #19
  20. temp409

    Matt Whiting Guest

    If the seat belt has a pendulum style inertial lock, then jerking the
    seatbelt proves nothing. This style activates only if the entire
    vehicle is jerked.


    Matt
     
    Matt Whiting, Mar 29, 2006
    #20
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.