Built like a Mercedes (?)

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Comments4u, Jan 29, 2006.

  1. Comments4u

    Steve Guest

    Actually, its a little further than that to go from San Diego, CA to
    Crescent City CA on Interstate 5... but don't let any Californians know
    that I admitted this :)


    Sounds like AMTRAK. A friend of mine travelled by AMTRAK last year, and
    told me that they were 20 hours late arriving on the way to their
    destination, but only 18 hours late on the return trip :-/
     
    Steve, Feb 9, 2006
  2. Comments4u

    Steve Guest

    I seriously doubt those US numbers. Maybe if that is an average for ALL
    citizens, including the vast number in New York, Chicago, Boston, and
    San Francisco that don't even own cars... But I don't know. It just
    feels wrong, based on the fact that my annual mileage is between 20k and
    25k, and I have what is considered a rather short commute.
     
    Steve, Feb 9, 2006
  3. Comments4u

    Pooh Bear Guest

    How on earth can you run a railway like that ?

    Graham
     
    Pooh Bear, Feb 9, 2006
  4. Comments4u

    Floyd Rogers Guest

    Listen, if you don't believe the numbers, find your own and cite them
    or STFU.

    FloydR
     
    Floyd Rogers, Feb 9, 2006
  5. Comments4u

    Pooh Bear Guest

    I discovered that the US EPA uses a figure of 12,500 mi per annum for cars.
    UK average mileage is certainly ~ 12,000 mi ( commonly accepted figure )

    It seems that those who seek to find huge differences are simply mistaken.

    I would expect those in the US living 'out in the wilds' to have higher
    figures but statistically they are presumably a small insignificant minority.

    Graham
     
    Pooh Bear, Feb 10, 2006
  6. Comments4u

    Huw Guest

    Here are the figures for the USA which actually shows only 11400 miles per
    car overall with midwestern states actually posting lower mileage at 10700
    miles which goes very much against what has been implied by some posters
    here, particularly Steve and Clare from Canada. Of course Canada might be at
    variance but I doubt it. I have always assumed that mileage would not vary
    greatly from one country to another because it is primarily governed by the
    amount of *time* people feel comfortable devoting to what is essentially a
    waste of time.

    Here is a reference to a comprehensive and authoritative source
    http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/rtecs/chapter3.html

    Huw
     
    Huw, Feb 10, 2006
  7. Comments4u

    Huw Guest

    I have always assumed that mileage would not vary
    I should say that I always like to quote machinery use, even cars, by hours
    of use rather than mileage. I would guess that 'average' use doesn't vary
    much outside of between 350 to 400 hours per year wherever you are. Now
    let's see, 400 hours times say an average of 30mph is........ yes 12000
    miles which sounds about right. Hell, I should be a transport planner or
    something, my talents are wasted here LOL.
    My Land Rover has done 150,000 miles at an average [which I worked out with
    care some time ago] of 15mph is 10,000 hours over 21 years or 475 hours per
    year which looks to be about right at about an hour and a third a day, every
    day. To complete the same 10,000 hours of use my Land Cruiser will average
    31mph so will have to total 310,000 miles. At present I complete less than
    650 hours per year, which is long enough, to complete 20,000 miles
    approximately so will need another 10 years of use to match the LR's total
    use.

    10,000 hours is 50 weeks of a full 40 hours solid for five years. Yeeeek!

    Huw
     
    Huw, Feb 10, 2006
  8. Comments4u

    theguy Guest

    just curious here. is anyone on alt.autos.dodge.trucks really paying
    any attention to the absolutely insane fucking posts going on in this
    thread anymore?

    i mean, have we not had enough reminders of how totally fucking boring
    our "friends" in the uk are?

    just asking, you know?
     
    theguy, Feb 10, 2006
  9. Comments4u

    Pooh Bear Guest

    Just think yourselves lucky that the US still has any 'friends'.
    You're welcome.

    Graham
     
    Pooh Bear, Feb 10, 2006
  10. Comments4u

    theguy Guest

    yeah graham poohy, we'll just think that. yeah, we sure will.
     
    theguy, Feb 10, 2006
  11. Comments4u

    Bill Putney Guest

    Hey - to borrow a line from the movie 'Short Circuit', with friends like
    you, who needs enemas?

    Bill Putney
    (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
    address with the letter 'x')
     
    Bill Putney, Feb 10, 2006
  12. Comments4u

    Pooh Bear Guest

    I guess you could revert to 'splendid isolationism' of course. Did they teach
    you about that at your hick school ?

    Btw. Check out who owns your foreign bases before dissing your 'friends' as
    you call us.

    Graham
     
    Pooh Bear, Feb 10, 2006
  13. Comments4u

    Pooh Bear Guest

    Getting sore about a bit of well-intended criticism ?

    Before any more idiotic Middle East adventurism you guys might do well to
    see if your military can cope with it. Curent signs suggest Iraq alone is
    pushing it. Of course being a bunch of pussies doesn't help.

    Graham
     
    Pooh Bear, Feb 10, 2006
  14. If anyone was running it, it wouldn't be like that.
     
    clare at snyder.on.ca, Feb 10, 2006
  15. Only one problen, Huw - your "comprehensive and authorative" source is
    12 years out of date. In that 12 years many farmers have had to resort
    to working "off farm" to make ends meet. These farmers need to drive
    significant distances to and from work - adding to the average
    mileage. Also, the price of housing has skyrocketed in the major urban
    centers - and more people are buying homes in the "outlying areas"
    because that is all they can afford, and/or because they do not want
    the inner city urban lifestyle. So they spend 5 hours a day commuting,
    at average speeds just less than 80KM per hour (or 50 M per hour) - or
    125 miles each way. It is a HORRENDOUS waste of time, but the high
    paid jobs are in the city - and the homes and lifestyle these higher
    earners want are not.
    One thing that DOES tend to keep the average down is the fact many
    households have more than one car - and even more than one car per
    driver - so the "good" car, or the "toy" or the "RV" may get
    significantly lower mileage. This brings down the average miles per
    vehicle, but not the average miles per driver. One neighbour's
    Corolla gets about 50 times the miles his Golf gets, because the Golf
    sits in the garage most of the time, while the Corolla does the 60
    mile (each way) commute 5 days a week. Any winter out-of town trips
    are on the Corolla - the shiny polished Golf only goes out when the
    sun is shining and the roads are dry.
     
    clare at snyder.on.ca, Feb 10, 2006
  16. Comments4u

    Huw Guest

    You think only the US have more than 1 vehicle per houshold? You know I can
    easily get the figures for you if you insist. But first...........
    Latest US figures for 2001 can be found here. It is easy to work out that
    the average has risen to around 11850 miles per vehicle
    Cars average 11400,SUV's 13200, PUtrucks 12100, RV's 5900.

    http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/rtecs/nhts_survey/2001/tablefiles/t0464(2005).pdf

    If you must bullshit, you'd better make sure the figures back you up.

    Huw






    ..
     
    Huw, Feb 10, 2006
  17. Comments4u

    Huw Guest

    Here we are.
    In the UK 25% of all housholds have two cars and a further 5% have three or
    more. That is over 30% of all housholds with two cars or more while 26% have
    no cars at all. I suspect that the greater number of 0 car housholds are in
    cities where there is no room to park.

    Huw
     
    Huw, Feb 10, 2006
  18. Comments4u

    Huw Guest


    Fuel use comparison for train vs trucks, buses and motor cars.

    http://www.transwatch.co.uk/transport-fact-sheet-5.htm


    The index for all fact sheets can be found here.
    http://www.transwatch.co.uk/fact-sheets.htm

    A nice accurate summary can be found here
    http://www.spiked-online.com/articles/0000000CAF2C.htm

    Huw
     
    Huw, Feb 10, 2006
  19. Comments4u

    Max Dodge Guest

    Hell, if you must bullshit, might as well get 2006 figures if you're going
    to call it "the latest figures."

    --
    Max

    "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
    soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
    -Ed Howdershelt (Author)
     
    Max Dodge, Feb 10, 2006
  20. Comments4u

    Max Dodge Guest

    Well Huw, this says it all:


    (a) A motorway coach would return 10 miles per gallon and contain an
    average of 20 people
    (b) Rail freight in lorries would provide 30 Tonne loads, full out
    empty back, yielding an average of 15 Tonnes. Lorries may return 8 miles per
    gallon on uncongested rural roads or 7 mpg on average.<<



    First, they make an assumption. Big fat no no if yuo want accurate data.
    Then, they ASSume that the motorcoach would have passengers both ways. Can't
    do that if you won't do it for the railway. Both of them have periods of
    time when they will be less than full.

    But once again, you've bypassed the facts, and gone with assumptions. Just
    because a motorcoach is used more frequently doesn't make it more efficient
    at moving a load.

    --
    Max

    "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
    soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
    -Ed Howdershelt (Author)
     
    Max Dodge, Feb 10, 2006
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.