Built like a Mercedes (?)

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Comments4u, Jan 29, 2006.

  1. Comments4u

    Pooh Bear Guest

    This particular model wasn't sold in the USA. In any case, 'pattern parts' are
    often made locally.

    Good. It is true btw. I've been stuggling to recall the parts that *did* need
    replacing. Almost nothing under the hood bar the usual service parts. I recall
    it needed some fuel hoses replaced and maybe the water pump ( not sure about
    that - maybe it was my previous Cavalier ).

    Graham
     
    Pooh Bear, Jan 31, 2006
  2. Comments4u

    Huw Guest

    Parts travel both ways. The parts for the US built X5 and Mclass I owned
    were no different to German built models. Parts for Japanese built vehicles
    are no more expensive then British built Japanese brands.
    Transport cost is trivial from the US to Europe and vise-versa. A container
    will contain many thousands of parts but will cost about $1500 to ship from
    store to store which is likely to be less than a Dollar an item. In fact the
    manufacturer will charge a percentage for transport so that a filter will
    have maybe 10C transport while a $100 part will have maybe $2 added.


    So you have doubts. Hmm.

    Huw
     
    Huw, Jan 31, 2006
  3. Comments4u

    Huw Guest

    All your writing does not change the fact that 1/2 ton trucks are not common
    in Europe and that 1 ton payloads are almost universal. The 1 ton trucks are
    very much smaller than yours though and are typified by the Toyota Hi-lux.

    Huw
     
    Huw, Jan 31, 2006
  4. Comments4u

    Huw Guest

    in general 10,000 to 12000 mile intervals do not need synthetic oil. It is
    true that most intervals longer than that do specify various grades of
    synthetic but every vehicle irrispective of change interval have a specified
    oil grade which they should use.

    Huw
     
    Huw, Jan 31, 2006
  5. Comments4u

    Huw Guest

    Yes I know.

    Huw
     
    Huw, Jan 31, 2006
  6. Comments4u

    Huw Guest

    Yes cars of that period were less reliable than today and rotted. Exhausts
    and batteries seldom lasted more than a year and new vehicle warranties were
    commonly six months only with no warranty for exhausts and stuff. Things
    move on.


    You have more experience than most here then.



    Huw
     
    Huw, Jan 31, 2006
  7. Comments4u

    Huw Guest

    I am not in a position to do anything but it seems to me that the problem is
    not one of productivity but one of cost and sales. The cost of pensions and
    logistics. The lack of desirable motors that people actually want to buy
    without disasterous discounts having to be applied.

    Huw
     
    Huw, Jan 31, 2006
  8. Comments4u

    Huw Guest

    I stated somewhere that there were instances where trains were obviously
    more efficient and indeed they are used in those applications because that
    is what they are good for. Carrying bulk products like coal and ore from
    production point to end point.
    It is noteworthy that you have changed from comparing passenger carrying
    vehicles to heavy freight.
    You should note that I don't disagree with you that trains are efficient
    freight carriers as long as they load at the production point and unload at
    the processing point and the distance is long.

    Huw
     
    Huw, Jan 31, 2006
  9. Comments4u

    Huw Guest

    You have lost the passenger arguement and are attempting to change the topic
    to freight. Good, you just carry on.

    Huw
     
    Huw, Jan 31, 2006
  10. Comments4u

    Huw Guest


    You are falling into the dodge set by Maximus Dodgeus in changing the
    subject from passengers to freight. There is no doubt that per ton mile the
    train is most efficient with heavy freight but you have to take into account
    the logistics at both ends and the timeliness.
    No you don't, because we are taliking cars and passengers, not freight.

    Huw
     
    Huw, Jan 31, 2006
  11. Comments4u

    Bill Putney Guest

    Wow - you really don't remember the Hitler thing, do you. That's
    incredible.

    Bill Putney
    (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
    address with the letter 'x')
     
    Bill Putney, Jan 31, 2006
  12. Comments4u

    Pooh Bear Guest

    I've heard it suggested that the popular 10-30 and 10-40 multigrades sold in
    Europe are refined to a higher degree than in the US. Nevertheless I prefer to
    use synthetics for oil change intervals of ~ 10,000 mi.

    Also, there seems to be more short journeys in the US which probably hammers the
    oil worse.

    Graham
     
    Pooh Bear, Jan 31, 2006
  13. Comments4u

    Pooh Bear Guest

    I must have missed this one.

    If rail is no less expensive that truck haulage for heavy commodities it begs
    the question why anyone uses it !

    Graham
     
    Pooh Bear, Jan 31, 2006
  14. Comments4u

    Pooh Bear Guest

    Hitler never attempted to make German the only language in Europe.

    Graham
     
    Pooh Bear, Jan 31, 2006
  15. Comments4u

    Roy Guest

    No dip shit, it show's he knows how to use a weapon.

    Roy
     
    Roy, Jan 31, 2006
  16. I misunderstood Huw. I thought the point you were making was that little
    trucks are not common in europe, but in north america 1/2 tons are very
    common but typically only carry fishing tackle.

    I was explaining that 1/2 ton truck owners here USE their trucks to WORK.
    (and most of us need an 8' box)

    rach
     
    Rachel Easson, Jan 31, 2006
  17. yes good point -- probably another reason why the cheapest oil will do in an
    old block (80's), as long as you change it every 3-5000 mi when you are
    travelling dirt roads or breathing in construction dirt -- i think i have an
    extra 6 gallons of oil and oil fiters

    rach
     
    Rachel Easson, Jan 31, 2006
  18. Comments4u

    theguy Guest


    really graham, or i man pooh. it was your idea not mine. hmmm.
     
    theguy, Jan 31, 2006
  19. Comments4u

    theguy Guest

    wow. how relevant. i mean pooh baby, chalk one up for you. geez,
    great point.

    wow, what an incredible idiot. i am surprised that they let you use
    the computer at the "home" graham.
     
    theguy, Jan 31, 2006
  20. Comments4u

    Pooh Bear Guest

    Bless you. You provide re-assurance ( should any be needed ) of the fabulously
    low intellect so prevalent in the USA. Do you drag your knuckles too ?

    Graham
     
    Pooh Bear, Jan 31, 2006
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.