Best looking Chryslers?

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Lloyd, Aug 4, 2008.

  1. Dori A Schmetterling, Aug 27, 2008
    #41
  2. Lloyd

    Steve Guest

    Of course not, its a Wankel. Efficiency isn't the objective,
    performance, light weight, and smoothness are. Wankels will never match
    piston engine efficiencies, just because of the fact that the fuel/air
    mix always has to sweep around the rotor chamber shedding precious heat
    energy to the cooling system all the way, instead of sitting in one spot
    and getting squeezed, burned, and expanded. Piston engines have gone
    back to "undersquare" designs to minimize combustion chamber surface
    area, the wankel effectively has a HUGE combustion chamber surface area
    by comparison.
     
    Steve, Aug 27, 2008
    #42
  3. Lloyd

    Steve Guest

    No, I agree they're anything but bland. But they, like the Viper, are a
    very expensive niche vehicle.
    Pretty nice, but give me an early '60s Alfa Duetto any day.
     
    Steve, Aug 27, 2008
    #43
  4. Lloyd

    Larry Guest

    Crossfire Roadster
    Always gets 2 looks, stunning car and pretty unique looking
     
    Larry, Sep 14, 2008
    #44
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.