Bankruptcy and Reorganization for Detroit?

No, just the claim. =)

"In addition, a surcharge is levied on the basic tax on income and wealth at
rates ranging from 5% to 395%."

 

A ridiculous lie.

As far as a tax on

Opposites day! lol

 

HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW

 

I think it's beyond your abilities. I suggest you learn what national
socialism is by generic definition instead of relying on whatever
fiction you believe. The use of 'left wing' was merely an attempt on my
part to have you understand by trying to fit it into the terms the
typical binary thinking american can grasp because they were taught that
nazism = national socialism = right wing, which of course is so
simplistic as to be very misleading. I would suggest looking at both
words separately. What nationalism is and what socialism is.

Maybe you're young enough to do compulsory service for your country, for
the good of your country as Obama so said he wishes to implement while
his economic team redistributes the wealth 'around'. This is supposed
to be "change" from rallying around the flag and 'supporting the
troops' while GWB's team redistributed the wealth 'around'.

'around'=those with the proper political connections.

nationalism + socialism = national socialism. It's very simple.

 

the dubious source goes on: Thus, the totals of basic tax, communal tax,
and surcharges results in the national tax due. Corporations pay income
tax at a rate of 7.5% to 15%.

 

Such grand arguments you have, they amount to nothing at all. I suggest
you read up on who wrote the federal reserve act. Hint: they didn't set
up the monetary and credit system to benefit anyone but themselves and
they weren't poor people.

 

"National Socialism" was an actual political party with an actual history.


The use of 'left wing' was merely an attempt on

Actually, that second 'equals' should be 'is a subset of' for your
statement to be correct. While all Nazis are right wing, all right wingers
are not Nazis. At least, not while anyone's watching.


I would suggest looking at both

Went though that about 1996 or thereabouts,.after running into right wing
k00khauses that try to pass the Nazis off as lefties.

Funny, the "National Socialists" jailed real socialists. What now?

 

the horse's mouth:
http://www.liechtenstein.li/en/elie...euern/fl-wuf-steuern-natuerliche_personen.htm

"Assuming a municipal tax surcharge of 200%, the minimum and maximum tax
rates are as follows: at least 0.162% and at most 0.8505% for asset tax;
at least 3.24% and at most 17.01% for income tax."

That's the bottom line. All the other figures are based on their 'tax
unit' various screwy methods of calculation that appear only to be
riveled by cook county IL property taxes.

 

There have also been 'socialist' and 'communist' political parties where
there particular implementations do change the meaning of the words.

Read it again clueless. I was describing what people are taught in US
government schools, not what is reality. I quite clearly state that such
a teaching is misleading. Do try to read for understanding.

Like I figured, you're caught up in left-right nonsense.

As if what was done in one impelementation changes anything. Socialists
jail other socialists, what's your point? Centralized power has to jail
its opposition when ever it can, it's the nature of the beast. How much
or how little they differ in idealogy is irrelevant. Democrats and
Republicans are barely different in idealogy in the US of A yet they
attack each other frequently to the point of being jailed in some cases.

 

Yes, and how much total?

http://wikitravel.org/en/Lichtenstein

"Low business taxes - the maximum tax rate is 20% - and easy incorporation
rules have induced a large number of holding or so-called letter box
companies to establish nominal offices in Liechtenstein, providing 30% of
state revenues."

Clearly a revenue model that could be exported everywhere. =)

 

Heaven forbid, prosperity for people instead of enslavement to criminals
who run governments.

 

Calling taxes theft just shows how radical, out on the fringe you are.

Corporations don't pay income taxes if they lose money.

VAT isn't consumption. And most European countries have both VAT and
some income tax.

Yeah, they can choose to not buy shelter, clothes, food, gas,
education for their children. The wealthy can choose to not buy that
yacht or jet or vacation to Monte Carlo.

You might note, every company pays income taxes on their US operations
-- Toyota, Honda, etc. It's not just the Detroit Big 3.

 

I wasn't aware that was possible. =)

Nope.


not what is reality. I quite clearly state that

Just used to seeing the term abused by folks who use all the same
ideological keywords you do.

"There have also been 'socialist' and 'communist' political parties
where there particular implementations do change the meaning of the
words."

Make up my mind, will ya?

 

It says you pay from 23% to 413% on income, plus a tax on your
wealth. Plus a capital gains tax, motor vehicle tax, estate tax, VAT,
and gift tax.

 

It is what it is. 'taxing' people to pay citibank and others is theft.
Just that government held the gun for the people they gave the money to.

If they lose money they won't be making product for very long.

Value Added Tax. You don't pay it unless you buy (consume) something.

Or maybe a chemistry professor could choose not to drive a mercedes?
Anyway, a tax on buying stuff is only slightly less vile than an income
tax. It is quite possible to manage ones expenses such that one pays
very little tax based on his consumption. What your real objection is
amounts to the loss of how progressive income taxes allow for the
engineering of society by control freaks. Sadly what you fail to realize
is those control freaks in charge of the whole mess are those very very
wealthy people who can buy a government. Maybe you noticed how
goldman-sachs is getting its money's worth from Obama.

Which is irrelevant to the answer to your question.

 

It's the same thing. Read it again. You ain't worth the time.

 

They were terribly conflicted.
-- Ernie

 

Just getting rid of any competition.

 

Not much substance there is there? (rhetorical question) Unfortunately
that's the mentality that will be running things.

 

Well, not if we repeal the 16th amendment.