air bag injuries due to propellant chemicals

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by linda, Nov 3, 2004.

  1. Hopefully not while riding in the car, because that's no safety device
    at all.
     
    Garth Almgren, Nov 5, 2004
  2. linda

    linda Guest

    thank you for the humor.... after being blasted by some this was a
    breath of fresh air...

    thanks.. linda
     
    linda, Nov 5, 2004
  3. Your politeness is exceeded only by your beauty which is, undoubtedly,
    conspicuous by its absence.

    DAS
     
    Dori A Schmetterling, Nov 5, 2004
  4. (top-posting fixed)

    Since I don't keep a spike on my steering wheel, being stabbed in the
    chest was unlikely in the extreme. Since the seat belt was sufficient
    to prevent contact with the steering wheel, blunt-force trauma leading
    to death was also unlikely in the extreme. You're trying to compare
    non-benefits against minor injuries, and it won't work.
     
    Matthew Russotto, Nov 5, 2004
  5. The answer to highway murders is NOT to put explosives in your car.
    The answer is to chop off the hands and feet of the speeders and DUIs
    and RLRs and CPDs.
     
    Laura Bush murdered her boy friend, Nov 5, 2004
  6. linda

    linda Guest

    I have been talking to David off the group and i want to take this
    opportunity to apologize to him for thinking that he sent me two virus'.
    he assures me that he did not, and i am the kind that believes him. i
    apologize to the entire group. i apologize especially to David... David,
    if you can forgive my thinking you did send me the virus', i would be so
    grateful. if not, i can completely understand.

    i would like to start over with you, David and anyone i have offended.
    i started out with a topic of my interest, not any reasoning except what
    i realize now is a futile attempt to help, and ended up with all the
    garbage.. this is not what the newsgroup was intended for.. i will try
    to find another forum for my interest (research) and leave you kind
    folks alone...

    I sincerely apologize over and over again David. and group...

    linda
     
    linda, Nov 5, 2004
  7. Or maybe the other way round.

    DAS
    --
    For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling
    ---

     
    Dori A Schmetterling, Nov 5, 2004
  8. linda

    Bill Putney Guest

    Well I did miss that (both your coming out and QVC) - though I already
    knew (about you - not QVC).

    Bill Putney
    (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
    adddress with the letter 'x')
     
    Bill Putney, Nov 5, 2004
  9. linda

    Matt Whiting Guest

    I guess to me all liberals are much the same! :)


    Matt
     
    Matt Whiting, Nov 5, 2004
  10. linda

    Matt Whiting Guest

    Evidence please?

    Matt
     
    Matt Whiting, Nov 5, 2004
  11. linda

    Matt Whiting Guest

    Another one you got wrong.

    Matt
     
    Matt Whiting, Nov 5, 2004
  12. linda

    Matt Whiting Guest

    As is almost anything ... and that was his point.


    Matt
     
    Matt Whiting, Nov 5, 2004
  13. linda

    Matt Whiting Guest

    I just call them as I see them. I don't use vulgarity, sorry to
    disappoint you. However, your views are clearly in the liberal camp in
    spite of your denial.

    Matt
     
    Matt Whiting, Nov 5, 2004
  14. linda

    Matt Whiting Guest

    This is a newsgroup post, not an email. There is a difference.


    Matt
     
    Matt Whiting, Nov 5, 2004
  15. linda

    Matt Whiting Guest

    And that was the guns fault? Yep, definitely liberal and, like Ted
    said, starting to sound on the left of liberal.


    Matt
     
    Matt Whiting, Nov 5, 2004
  16. linda

    Bill Putney Guest

    If you can show me where those things are said and apply to me, then I
    will consider them. IOW - that's strawman.
    Can't blame me for that one.
    Won't find me saying that either.
    Am I supposed to be feeling guilty about something here when it doesn't
    apply to me? If you're using that to explain your anger, then I can
    understand, but if it's supposed to apply to me, then I don't accept it.
    We've had this conversation before. You don't have to guess. The
    answers are available. Apparently many people believe that God left us
    without any "operator manual", and then they get mad at Him when things
    don't work they way they think they should (we put antifreeze in the
    crankcase, so to speak, and then wonder why it doesn't work anymore -
    read into that whatever you like).

    Look - the worst spritual rapings I've ever gotten were from people who
    "love God", so I know where you're coming from on that. I just think
    many people take out on God (and those who have done none of the things
    that you are angry about) what *people* do to them - probably
    subconsciously.

    Bill Putney
    (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
    adddress with the letter 'x')
     
    Bill Putney, Nov 5, 2004
  17. linda

    Bill Putney Guest

    It's a tough job, but somebody has to do it. 8^)

    Bill Putney
    (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
    adddress with the letter 'x')
     
    Bill Putney, Nov 5, 2004
  18. linda

    Bill Putney Guest

    Please provide a quote to substantiate this.
    So it's come down to saying things that someone hasn't said or wouldn't
    say and saying they said it anyway. You're smarter than that Daniel -
    except when it comes to this subject. Once again - angry at me for what
    others have apparently done or said to you?

    Bill Putney
    (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
    adddress with the letter 'x')
     
    Bill Putney, Nov 5, 2004
  19. linda

    Bill Putney Guest

    Sounds like she also has a problem picking decent men.

    Bill Putney
    (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
    adddress with the letter 'x')
     
    Bill Putney, Nov 5, 2004
  20. D'you seek to find out political candidates' stances on shellfish,
    widower-remarrying, mixed-fiber garments, and so forth? Would you care one
    way or the other if a Presidential candidate (or a schoolboard candidate,
    for that matter) said he was strongly in favor of a constitutional
    amendment banning marriages between widowers and new wives?

    ....and yet, let the topic be your one little particular "sin", and it
    suddenly becomes all important (and God-driven) to you.
    Yeah, yeah, I know. The cookbook approach to life.
     
    Daniel J. Stern, Nov 5, 2004
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.