A bit of research on the ATF +3 ATF +4 issue

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Ted Mittelstaedt, Oct 17, 2003.

  1. Aw, shit! There goes Ted's latest conspiracy theory! Now what'll he spend
    his time on?

    DS
     
    Daniel J. Stern, Oct 22, 2003
    #41
  2. Ted Mittelstaedt

    Greg Johnson Guest

    I respectfully disagree with your conclusions about the ATF+4 fluid.
     
    Greg Johnson, Oct 23, 2003
    #42
  3. Ted Mittelstaedt

    73blazer Guest

    I know what your saying, but they all do it.
    I own a '97 Chevy Full size CK PU, with 5sp Manual trans, and the spec
    call for a special "fill for life" (yeah right) fluid. While I don't
    need to change it near as often as my wifes inherited '94 Spirit, at
    130,000mi, I decided to change it for the first time last spring, 4
    quarts, $12/quart. Only available from GM.
    At least all I had to do was drop the plug and wait for it to stop,
    unlike the spirit I have to run for a minute with the trans cooler line
    disconnected while pooring in new fluid to get the "other 2 quarts" out.

    Ken
     
    73blazer, Oct 24, 2003
    #43
  4. Let's see now, Bill Putney already posted that DC: Equilon (makers of
    Havoline and
    Shell oil products in the US) is one of the two manufacturers of it for
    Chrysler.

    So it appears that all you have done is go to Havolines site and chase down
    to
    the MSDS and located the MSDS for the oem products, which of course
    include ATF+4.

    I guess you still haven't read the ilma article here:

    http://www.imakenews.com/flashpoint/e_article000113903.cfm

    I'll repeat this very slowly so you can understand. Chrysler is not
    permitting Havoline
    to sell ATF+4 to the general public. Thus, you cannot buy Havoline ATF+4
    from
    the retail store. If you bothered to look you would find that ATF+4 is not
    listed
    anywhere on Havoline's website as a product available for sale to the
    general public.

    You claim that you can get it for 10 quarts for $59.99
    Well, that's $10 a quart which is higher than what it costs to buy it at the
    Chrysler
    dealership. In fact, double the cost according to some people here.
    Obviously
    it is cheaper for the manufacturer that makes ATF+4 to sell it directly than
    to sell
    it to Chrysler who has to spend money handling it, then resell it. Since
    according to
    you the price is higher directly from Havoline, obviously Chrysler is
    forcing Havoline
    to price it above cost if Havoline tries to sell it directly.

    If your still convinced that it's available through Havoline, then post the
    instructions
    on who to call to purchase it. I''m sure that the ILMA legal staff would be
    most
    interested.

    Ted
     
    Ted Mittelstaedt, Oct 24, 2003
    #44
  5. No, Dan, this is not MY conspiracy theory. It is the ILMA's conspiracy
    theory. Please
    read the article:

    http://www.imakenews.com/flashpoint/e_article000113903.cfm

    Ted
     
    Ted Mittelstaedt, Oct 24, 2003
    #45
  6. Ted Mittelstaedt

    Bill Putney Guest

    Uh - 60÷10 = ? 8^)

    Bill Putney
    (to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
    address with "x")
     
    Bill Putney, Oct 24, 2003
    #46
  7. :) That was just to provoke a response from Chuck. The actual price per
    quart
    at that is $6 but still that's at best only $2 cheaper than the gouging
    dealerships
    out there, and pretty even compared to the non-gouging dealerships. And of
    course
    even if the general public could get an auto parts place to order it, for
    someone
    who only needs a single quart to top off a transmission, they are going to
    have to
    go to the dealer.

    I think that Neil Nelson really had it summed up with the comment about the
    Ford
    trannies. It seems that some transmission designers out there have a long
    term plan
    to seal off transmission fluid additions from the general public. In short
    they want it
    so that the average person cannot add transmission fluid to their vehicle.
    For this to
    work of course they gotta make the fluid last the life of the transmission,
    thus the
    move to synthetic ATF. Next is going to come a subtle campaign to convince
    people
    that trans fluid lasts the life of the car and never needs changing. Then
    last they are
    going to take away the dipstick.

    It makes me wonder if perhaps Chrysler has seen a lot of warranty claims
    paid out
    over the years on transmission damage caused by use of the wrong fluid, and
    they
    want to put an end to that.

    When it comes down to it I don't disagree with the idea of pricing
    transmission
    fluid in the $10-a-quart range if it's never going to need to be changed for
    the
    life of the vehicle. I just feel that it's rediculous to think that you can
    design a
    completely sealed lubrication system and have it run indefinitely. And I
    also find
    the claims that synthetic fluid is so much more fantastic than regular fluid
    that it
    removes the need for regular fluid changes, to be pretty undigestible.

    Ted
     
    Ted Mittelstaedt, Oct 25, 2003
    #47
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.