93 Octane??

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by HB2, Dec 7, 2003.

  1. HB2

    HB2 Guest

    I have a 1998 Jeep V8. The owners manual calls for 93 Octane.

    Will using 89 hurt my vehicle and if so how?
    How about 87?

    I want to make sure I am not wasting my money.
     
    HB2, Dec 7, 2003
    #1
  2. Yes, the potential is there. The how is from detonation.

    You aren't wasting your money following the manufacturer's
    recommendations for your vehicle. You would waste a lot more money by
    not following them.


    Matt
     
    Matthew S. Whiting, Dec 7, 2003
    #2
  3. HB2

    HB2 Guest

    Can I try 89 and just listen for detonation......or is this ridiculous???
     
    HB2, Dec 7, 2003
    #3
  4. HB2

    Greg Guest

    Chances are that you won't hear either detonation or preignition over the
    sound of the engine, unless it is a loud knock. Your engine may be equipped
    with a knock sensor to retard the spark however. This should avoid damage to
    the engine, but possibly cause you to lose power. If your manual calls for
    93 octane, I would use it.
     
    Greg, Dec 7, 2003
    #4
  5. Sure, if you don't really care much about your engine. You may or may
    not hear it. If you didn't want to buy high octane gas, why did you buy
    an engine that requires it?

    You can also not change your oil and listen for signs of mechanical
    failure...


    Matt
     
    Matthew S. Whiting, Dec 7, 2003
    #5
  6. Matt

    Give the guy a break, not everyone knows the importance of using the correct
    octane fuel. All he needs to know is that he really must use the correct
    octane gas. Using 89 at best would give him worse fuel economy and
    performance but at worst could seriously damage his car's engine.

    G.
     
    Gerald Wooding, Dec 7, 2003
    #6
  7. HB2

    mic canic Guest

    i would bet it's the 5.9 engine and yes it needs the higher octane if
    it's the special one i'm thinking it is
     
    mic canic, Dec 7, 2003
    #7
  8. I, and at least one other person, told him why this was a bad idea in an
    earlier post. He came back again still looking for a way to do
    something stupid. I was simply making an illustration, that I hoped he
    could understand as he's obviously not very mechanically literate, as to
    how stupid this is. As you say, it MAY only cause him a performance
    loss, but it CAN, under the right circumstances, cause him serious
    engine damage.

    Also, after the profane message he sent to my home email address, it is
    obvious that he not only isn't too bright, he's also gutless wonder.

    So, HB2, you are right, to quote from your email, misspelling and all,
    "You response tells me you are an asshole.", so you'd better ignore my
    advice and run the lowest octane gas you can find. Some places even
    sell 86, maybe you can find some of that. Enjoy your Jeep!



    Matt
     
    Matthew S. Whiting, Dec 8, 2003
    #8
  9. HB2

    Mike Hall Guest

    It is ok to use higher octane fuel in a vehicle designated for use of 'cheap
    stuff'.. however, it is a waste of money, as no extra performance will be
    gained.. use of cheap fuel in a vehicle designated to run on higher octane
    will eventually lead to problems.. if you are so cheap, you should have gone
    for one of the lesser engine variants..
     
    Mike Hall, Dec 8, 2003
    #9
  10. HB2

    Mike Hall Guest

    Mike Hall, Dec 8, 2003
    #10
  11. HB2

    Richard Guest

    Thanks for the link. But note that it is full of very inaccurate
    information. A high octane fuel in a motor not designed for it can be
    harmful! It is not clear cut because the methods to achieve a high octane
    number are quite varied. But some of the additives used in some of the
    products can degrade performance at the least.

    Richard.
     
    Richard, Dec 9, 2003
    #11
  12. How and why is it harmful? I've heard this claim made before, but I've
    never seen any logical reason given. And I've never heard it from a
    credible source such as an auto maker or gasoline maker.


    Matt
     
    Matthew S. Whiting, Dec 9, 2003
    #12
  13. HB2

    C. E. White Guest

    Vehicle with knock sensor often take advantage of higher octane fuel and
    advance the ignition timing. This can improve fuel economy and provide a
    slight increase in power if the engine PCM has the proper programming.

    However, higher octance gas when used in cars without a knock sensor is
    probably at best not useful (unless you have a problem with knock). The
    following is from a relatively old Ford TSB (91-8-13):

    ISSUE:
    Rough idle, hesitation, poor throttle response, induction backfire and
    stalls during cold start/warm up may be caused by the poor volatility of
    some high octane premium grade unleaded fuels (91 octane or higher
    (R+M)/2). When compared to regular grade unleaded fuel (87 octane
    (R+M)/2), high octane premium grade unleaded fuel may cause long crank
    time.

    ACTION:
    Use a regular grade unleaded fuel in all vehicles, except where a
    premium unleaded fuel is recommended in the Owner Guide. If lean
    air-fuel type symptoms are experienced, determine the grade and brand of
    fuel used and offer the following service tips.

    Advise those using a higher octane grade fuel to switch to a regular
    grade unleaded fuel. For those using a regular grade fuel, advise them
    to try another brand. Do not advise using a higher octane unleaded fuel
    than is recommended for that specific engine. Ford engines are designed
    to perform best using a high quality regular grade unleaded fuel. Only
    advise using a higher octane unleaded fuel to avoid potentially damaging
    spark knock or ping, but do so only after mechanical fixes are
    ineffective.

    Ed
     
    C. E. White, Dec 9, 2003
    #13
  14. That's interesting, but as you say is pretty old. My understanding is
    the vapor pressure and octane aren't necessarily correlated. For
    example, in the northeast we have summer and winter gasoline. The
    octane ratings are the same for both seasons, but the gasoline has a
    different RVP in winter to be more volatile and thus help starting at
    cold temps. Lead was one of the earliest additives to enhance octane
    rating and it doesn't change the RVP. Maybe the newer octane rating
    additives do have a significant affect on RVP, but since our octane
    ratings don't change from summer to winter, there apparently are ways to
    modify RVP independently of octane rating.


    Matt
     
    Matthew S. Whiting, Dec 10, 2003
    #14
  15. HB2

    C. E. White Guest

    It is from the post lead era, but from a time when many Fords used speed
    density (no MAF) / bank fire injection systems. I think these were less
    tolerant of less than ideal gasoline.

    Chevron has an interesting web site if you want to read up on gasoline:

    http://www.chevron.com/prodserv/fuels/bulletin/motorgas/
    http://www.chevron.com/prodserv/fuels/gas_qanda/api_octane.shtml

    Mobil also has some good information (although a little more pro premium
    than Chevron):

    http://www.mobil.com/USA-English/GFM/Products_Services/Fuels/Gasoline_FAQ.asp

    Ed
     
    C. E. White, Dec 10, 2003
    #15
  16. I have never heard a credible source warn against using higher octane
    fuel in a car designed to use a lower octane fuel. Octane is simply a
    measure of the volatility of the fuel. Higher octane = less volatility
    and slower/cooler burn with more energy per molecule of fuel. Higher
    octane is also more resistant to pre-ignition/detonation than "the cheap
    stuff." The net effect is that combustion chamber temperatures are
    lower with higher octane fuel. Another benefit is that more air/fuel
    can be mixed in the chamber (under higher compression) resulting in
    higher power output for a given combustion chamber volume. That's why
    most forced induction applications (turbocharged/supercharged) tend to
    spec high octane fuel.

    As for the methods of raising octane, there really are only 2 that are
    widely used for unleaded fuel. You can add MTBE (methyl tertiary-butyl
    ether) or alcohol. In many states (like NY as of the end of the month)
    MTBE has been banned so chances are that your fuel is a mix of petroleum
    distillates and ethanol to achieve the desired octane.

    Other than unecessarily lightening your wallet, there should not be any
    reason to avoid higher octane fuel if your car doesn't call for it.

    Cheers,

    C
     
    Chris Mauritz, Dec 10, 2003
    #16
  17. HB2

    Steve Guest

    That WAS a problem at one time, when alternatives to lead were first
    being experimented with to obtain higher octane ratings than 85-87
    (R+M)/2. I would date this to probably the mid to late 1980s, just guessing.

    The fact that early "high octane" (what a joke!) unleaded fuels had this
    problem has in fact lead to a wide-spread misconception that "octane"
    and "volatility" are related, and that "high octane" fuel is "less
    volatile" than low octane fuel. In general, that is NOT true at all.
    Octane rating is a measure of resistance to self-ignition, that is all.
    Volatility has no fundamental bearing on the matter. If you were to take
    two gasoline base stocks and raise the octane of one sample by using,
    say, tetraethyl lead or MMT and leave a second sample alone, the two
    samples would have the same volatility (propensity to vaporize at a
    given temperature and pressure). However, if gasoline makers use
    aromatic hydrocarbons (or non-hydrocarbons for that matter) to increase
    the octane rating instead of lead or manganese, then the volatility may
    be adversely affected, as it was in 80s era fuels. Today, most gasolines
    except the EPA-mandated special brews seem to be very well compensated
    for volatility and octane. Using a higher octane rating might be a waste
    of money, but with modern fuels it is harmless. And in fact *some*
    makers put other goodies like detergent and lubricant additives in their
    higher octane fuels, so there may be some advantage to the fuel system
    even if the octane rating is of no benefit.
     
    Steve, Dec 10, 2003
    #17
  18. No. Octane is simply a measure of a fuel's resistance to spontaneous,
    uncontrolled ignition under specific conditions. The measure of fuel
    volatility is called Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP).
    No. RVP (i.e. volatility) and octane do not have a causal relationship
    with each other in either direction. There are plenty of low-volatility,
    high-octane fuels, and there are plenty of high-volatility, low-octane
    fuels.
    No. High-octane gasoline burns at the same speed as low-octane gasoline,
    as long as preignition ("ping", "knock", the uncontrolled spontaneous
    ignition referred to above) is not encountered. And the burn is at the
    same temperature, not "cooler".
    This is not an "also", it is the defining characteristic of high-octane
    fuel.
    This is only the case if preignition is encountered in a particular
    combustion chamber with lower octane fuel. If it is not, then this
    statement is false.
    No. The octane rating of the fuel does not affect the amount of air/fuel
    mixture that can be introduced into the cylinder. This is a function of
    engine and induction system design.
    No. There are a great many refining techniques and chemicals that are used
    to increase the octane rating of unleaded fuel. The addition of MTBE and
    "alcohol" (ethanol) are only two of them.

    Chris, you *really* need to read the Gasoline FAQ.

    DS
     
    Daniel J. Stern, Dec 10, 2003
    #18
  19. <blush>

    Apparently so.

    </blush>
     
    Chris Mauritz, Dec 10, 2003
    #19
  20. HB2

    C. E. White Guest

    C. E. White, Dec 10, 2003
    #20
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.