'65 Chrysler trans fluid

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by ThaDriver, Jul 19, 2006.

  1. ThaDriver

    ThaDriver Guest

    Ok you Chrysler gurus: I need to KNOW what kind of trans fluid a '65 should
    use. Two different parts stores have told me two different types. They're
    the only ones that *thought* they knew; no one else would even guess. Do
    any of you *know* what kind it takes? 383 - 727
    TIA,
    ~ Paul
    aka "Tha Driver"
     
    ThaDriver, Jul 19, 2006
    #1
  2. ThaDriver

    kmatheson Guest

    Back in those days, things were much simpler. There was type *F* for
    Fords and dexron for just about everything else. I would think that
    dexron 3 or better would work just fine.

    I don't know what putting ATF3+/7176 would do or not do for an older
    transmission. You may wish to check on allpar.com in the transmission
    section.

    -KM
     
    kmatheson, Jul 19, 2006
    #2
  3. ThaDriver

    John Kunkel Guest

    Dexron would be the original factory recommended fluid but ATF+3 is also
    suitable. If slightly firmer shifting is desired type F can also be used.
     
    John Kunkel, Jul 19, 2006
    #3
  4. ThaDriver

    ThaDriver Guest

    Thanks guys. I haven't been working with older Mopars for a long time
    (although I'm a *large* fan) so I couldn't think of the best place to
    look. Turns out it was here. :)
    Visited Allpar & got the info (confirmation) I needed: "Use Dexron II or
    III fluid. In 1962 Chrysler suggested using Type A, Suffix A fluid, but
    that fluid has been superceded by Dexron II and III.". Took awhile to find
    it...
    Thanks again,
    ~ Paul
    aka "Tha Driver"

    I checked today and... this is the oldest I've ever been.
     
    ThaDriver, Jul 19, 2006
    #4
  5. ThaDriver

    Steve Guest

    Yep, the fluids commonly sold that meet both the DexronIII and Mercon
    spec work just fine in those transmisisons.

    It works perfectly. ATF+3 and +4 are fully backward-compatible with all
    the Dexron family of fluids, dating all the way back to the pre-Dexron
    "Type A." But its wasted money in a transmission that's perfectly happy
    on Dexron/Mercon, and ATF+3 is actually inferior in those cases because
    it has such poor oxidation characteristics. +4 fixed the oxidation
    problems that +3 had.
     
    Steve, Jul 24, 2006
    #5
  6. ThaDriver

    Count Floyd Guest

    Is it backward compatible with my 1940 FluidDrive?

    But its wasted money in a transmission that's perfectly happy
     
    Count Floyd, Jul 25, 2006
    #6
  7. ThaDriver

    Steve Guest

    IIRC, Chrysler "fluid drives" used engine oil, not a separate
    transmission fluid.

    But if I recall wrong and they used Type A fluid, then in theory it
    would be compatible. But I wouldn't do it- a) its a big waste of money,
    and b) I'd be a little concerned about the effect the added friction
    modifiers might have.
     
    Steve, Jul 25, 2006
    #7
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.