5-20 oil

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Alex Rodriguez, Jul 19, 2005.

  1. Who make 5-20 oil? I have a 2005 T&C with a 3.8 motor. We are coming up on
    the time to change the oil. I saw the recommended oil is one I don't recall
    having seen in the past. Would a 5-30 be bad?
     
    Alex Rodriguez, Jul 19, 2005
    #1
  2. All the major makers.
    But this is the present!
     
    Daniel J. Stern, Jul 19, 2005
    #2
  3. Alex Rodriguez

    kmatheson Guest

    Is 5-20w now the recommended oil for the 3.3/3.8? My 1993 3.3 calls for
    5-30.

    -Kirk Matheson
     
    kmatheson, Jul 19, 2005
    #3
  4. Alex Rodriguez

    Richard Guest

    If you live in a hot location 5W-30 might be a good choice. Mobil 1 comes in
    both a 5W-20 and 5W-30 selection. That's what I use and I change at the
    recommended extended change schedule of 7,500 miles or so.

    Richard.
     
    Richard, Jul 19, 2005
    #4
  5. Somethin' in the air today that's causing confusion amongst "past",
    "present" and "future"?

    5w20 is being recommended by lots of automakers in their North
    American-market vehicles for fuel economy certification reasons. The same
    engines in the same cars often call for 5w30 in other markets. This does
    not mean older vehicles should be switched to 5w20.
     
    Daniel J. Stern, Jul 20, 2005
    #5
  6. Alex Rodriguez

    kmatheson Guest

    That is what I was trying to determine. From what I gather, 5w20 is now
    being recommended for newer versions of the 3.3 and 3.8, depending on
    the market. I will stay with 5w30 synthetic for my 1993 3.3.

    Do new 3.3 and 3.8's have tighter clearances than their predecessors,
    or is is the 5w20 recommended only for the purpose of improving fuel
    economy?

    -Kirk Matheson
     
    kmatheson, Jul 20, 2005
    #6
  7. No. Engine internal clearances haven't changed significantly in the last
    four decades.
    Correct.
     
    Daniel J. Stern, Jul 20, 2005
    #7
  8. And I would also be concerned with longevity - it seems to me there's a
    fundamental tradeoff operating here. You can get best lubricating longevity
    or best fuel economy, but not both. Seems like good old 10W-30 was
    the recommended fill for most of those last four decades.

    Ted
     
    Ted Mittelstaedt, Jul 20, 2005
    #8
  9. Alex Rodriguez

    High Sierra Guest

    How much difference in mileage are we talking about?
     
    High Sierra, Jul 20, 2005
    #9
  10. Alex Rodriguez

    Robert Meyer Guest

    Thicker isn't always better. Lot's of good info on 5W-20's in the forums at
    bobistheoilguy.com. The used oil analyses for dino 5w-20's are just as good
    as for synth. Better resistance to shear over 5w-30, too. I can find 5w-20
    locally at Wally World, AutoZone, or O'Reilly's.

    Bob
     
    Robert Meyer, Jul 20, 2005
    #10
  11. I'm about to do the first oil change for my new 300C, should I do standard
    or synthetic? I've used Mobil 1 for the past 30 years, does it make sense
    to continue using it or are modern 5W-20 oils as good or better then Mobil
    1?
     
    General Schvantzkoph, Jul 21, 2005
    #11
  12. Alex Rodriguez

    Matt Whiting Guest

    They aren't as good as Mobil 1.


    Matt
     
    Matt Whiting, Jul 21, 2005
    #12
  13. Alex Rodriguez

    Robert Meyer Guest

    I'm about to do the first
    oil change for my new 300C, should I do standard
    The UOAs for SL/SM IL-4 dino 5w-20s are just as good as for synth. The
    owners manual says you can use synth, but you have to change it at the Sched
    A or B intervals to maintain your warranty, so no real savings in terms of
    fewer changes. Your call...

    bob
     
    Robert Meyer, Jul 21, 2005
    #13
  14. This sounds reasonable. But I would say it is not working. My T&C with a 3.8
    engine gets horrible mileage in city driving, under 15mpg. On the highway it
    does ok, about 24mpg. This is my biggest dissappointment with the T&C.
    Otherwise it is an excellent mini-van
     
    Alex Rodriguez, Jul 21, 2005
    #14
  15. Not the point -- the point is to squeak another fraction of an MPG in on
    the Federal fuel economy and emission certification tests, NOT to offer
    the consumer measurably better on-road fuel mileage.
     
    Daniel J. Stern, Jul 21, 2005
    #15
  16. My reasons for using Mobil 1 has always been for it's cold weather
    starting characteristics, not for it's extended life. Mobil 1 flows at
    very low temperatures, it was developed to work at -30 or -40F as I
    recall. At -10F, which is about as cold as it gets in New England, how do
    modern oils behave as compared to Mobil 1? Back when Mobil 1 was developed
    conventional oils were sludge at those temperatures, but that was 30 years
    ago.
     
    General Schvantzkoph, Jul 21, 2005
    #16
  17. Alex Rodriguez

    Matt Whiting Guest

    That is also the main reason I use it. However, it also is more stable
    at very high temperatures and this is important in many locales as well.
    Minivans seem to me to run very hot compared to other vehicles I own
    and have owned. The temp gauge has no absolute temperature numbers so
    I'm not sure how hot it really is, but I know when I open the hood on a
    hot day I can't even touch the prop rod to hold the hood open.

    Matt
     
    Matt Whiting, Jul 21, 2005
    #17
  18. Alex Rodriguez

    Bill Putney Guest

    And way secondary to the squeezing of another fraction of an MPG is
    improving engine life. Not that it will necessarily lead to
    catastrophic failure or gross reduction in useful life, but there is
    bound to be incremental cost in engine life. IOW, will they do put
    value on engine life, when they get an opportunity to trade off a
    miniscule gain in MPG for slight or moderate loss in engine life, they
    will take it. Compare that the manufacturer's recommendations in
    countries with similar ambient temperatures that don't have CAFE rules
    are for thicker oils(we're talking similar vehicle/identical engine.

    Bill Putney
    (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
    adddress with the letter 'x')
     
    Bill Putney, Jul 22, 2005
    #18
  19. Alex Rodriguez

    Bill Putney Guest

    Bill Putney wrote:

    Mis-typed - should have said:
    Bill Putney
    (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
    adddress with the letter 'x')
     
    Bill Putney, Jul 22, 2005
    #19
  20. Alex Rodriguez

    Robert Meyer Guest

    check the threads

    http://theoildrop.server101.com/cgi/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=3;t=002228

    http://theoildrop.server101.com/cgi/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=3;t=001244

    bob
     
    Robert Meyer, Jul 22, 2005
    #20
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.