300C Fuel recommendation

Discussion in 'Chrysler 300' started by NJ Vike, Nov 13, 2006.

  1. NJ Vike

    NJ Vike Guest

    Greetings.

    Does the 300C Hemi (not SRT) require premium or mid grade gas?

    Thanks

    Ken
     
    NJ Vike, Nov 13, 2006
    #1
  2. NJ Vike

    4-2LGW Guest

    The manual says "use 89 octane for optimum performance", but I have used
    regular at times and don't see any difference in performance and very little
    difference in mileage.
     
    4-2LGW, Nov 13, 2006
    #2
  3. NJ Vike

    NJ Vike Guest

    Thanks for the info.

    How do you like the vehicle? Has it been trouble free. What is it you
    like and dislike about the vehicle.

    I'm very interested in purchasing one so any information would be
    appreciated.

    Ken
     
    NJ Vike, Nov 13, 2006
    #3
  4. NJ Vike

    Art Guest

    The bad news is that the C has a bad repair record according to Consumer
    Reports for what its worth. The 6 cylinder is average reliability. May
    not be the engine. Could be added options with high end versions go bad.
     
    Art, Nov 13, 2006
    #4
  5. NJ Vike

    Steve Guest

    Its worth nothing. CR is worse than useless.
     
    Steve, Nov 13, 2006
    #5
  6. It works fine with 89, which is what the owners manual specifies, but it
    feels smoother with 93. I don't know if it's psychological or if the
    difference is real but my 300C AWD seems to run better with premium.
     
    General Schvantzkoph, Nov 13, 2006
    #6
  7. NJ Vike

    NJ Vike Guest

    Art,

    Yes. I've seen that but they don't provide any specifics. I'm not sure
    whether to believe them or not. I have found them right on the money about
    several cars I've looked at.

    Ken
     
    NJ Vike, Nov 13, 2006
    #7
  8. NJ Vike

    NJ Vike Guest

    Thanks General!

    Ken

    --
    "Now Phoebe Snow direct can go
    from thirty-third to Buffalo.
    From Broadway bright the tubes run right
    Into the Road of Anthracite"
    Erie - Lackawanna
     
    NJ Vike, Nov 13, 2006
    #8
  9. NJ Vike

    NJ Vike Guest

    Do you still have the M? If not, what are you driving now?

    --
    "Now Phoebe Snow direct can go
    from thirty-third to Buffalo.
    From Broadway bright the tubes run right
    Into the Road of Anthracite"
    Erie - Lackawanna
     
    NJ Vike, Nov 15, 2006
    #9
  10. NJ Vike

    philthy Guest

    using premium gas can and will set a check engine lite in this car
     
    philthy, Nov 17, 2006
    #10
  11. NJ Vike

    Art Guest

    We gave the 300M to my in-laws who love it. We had a tiny amount of body
    work done on it and then had it detailed and shipped it to them in Florida
    last year. Looked brand new when they got it and my wife saw it a few
    months ago and it still looked great. My wife bought a Honda Accord Hybrid
    to replace the 300M last year. Not a bad car but for a 5 or 6 year old
    design it still have a bunch of annoyances plus we miss features like auto
    headlights and driver seat glideback from the 300M. I needed a van so I
    could sometimes load my father's powerchair. I went with the Honda Odyssey
    to replace my Avalon. Didn't buy the Sienna because the Avalon was a rattle
    trap among other issues. Didn't buy the chrysler minivan because the
    chrysler service dept here had just become unacceptable.
     
    Art, Nov 17, 2006
    #11
  12. NJ Vike

    NJ Vike Guest

    We are looking. Haven't decided on anything. Cars I had to dismiss

    Honda Accord -> I'm too tall. Really liked the car
    Lincoln MKZ -> I'm too tall. Really liked the car
    Camry -> No back support. Nice car though
    Avalon -> Still pursuing.
    300C -> Still pursuing but comments in the Edmund's message board is
    starting to scare me. Some issues with the 300C.
    Acura TL -> A bit small but can fit okay. I really like this one
    Buick Lucerne -> No 6CD player with NAV. What's with GM anyway? I've noticed
    this on many of their vehicles. It's not a technology issue because you can
    get one with a Yukon or Cadillac.
    Chevy Impala - No rear room for passengers. LOVE that 303HP front wheel
    drive but watch out. Plenty of torque steer.
    Pontiac Grand Prix GTP - Even smaller than the Impala. Love the
    Heads-up-display and the auto stick on the steering wheel. Very cool.
    Ford 500/Mercury Montego - No frigging power. A little of 200hp doesn't move
    the car. Nice and roomy though and even a DVD entertainment system available
    with HID lights (Mercury only)
    Nissan Maxima - Nissan's flagship isn't getting more HP. In fact, the new
    Altama has more 270.
    Audi A6 - Slow but nice interior.
    Chevy Trailblazer - Gotta test drive one with the Vette engine. Liked it but
    no 6CD and Nav system and not much back support.

    Bottom line

    300C vs. Avalon.
     
    NJ Vike, Nov 17, 2006
    #12
  13. NJ Vike

    Art Guest

    Have you checked to see if the new year will bring more power to the Ford
    500? I thought they were trying to fit a new engine into it finally.

    I am only 5'7" and I fine the Accord a bit confining. Also headlights are
    pathetic. Dan S. sold me some replacement bulbs that give off 85% more
    light with no significant change in power problems to burn out wiring and
    that has helped a lot but it is unbelievable to me that people are driving
    Accords around with the headlights that come out of the factory.


    Some people love their new Avalons but some people are unhappy because of
    unfixable AT issues so check the car you buy before signing the dotted line.
    If you detect the Avalon they are selling you has any hesistation between
    gears, don't take it.
     
    Art, Nov 21, 2006
    #13
  14. NJ Vike

    who Guest

    I have a friend with last yrs 500 using the 3L HO Taurus engine. It's
    OK , thanks to the 6 sp auto.
    I would expect Ford to eventually upgrade it to the new VVT 3L engine
    used in the Fusion. If they don't Ford just isn't interested in giving
    customers the best they have.
     
    who, Nov 21, 2006
    #14
  15. NJ Vike

    NJ Vike Guest

    Yes. They will be adding a 263 or 265HP powerplant to their lineup. Should
    suffice but instead of beating the competition, they're just settling in. I
    think it's the same engine that's currently in the MKZ.

    I liked the Accord. One thing about Honda I noticed and that is good back
    support with strong seats. Unfortunately, I don't fit in the car comfortably
    since I'm 6'2. I did, however, fit nicely in the Acura TL.
    Yes. I did see complaints in Edmonds about that and the Lexus. How this
    hasn't gotten the publicity I'll never understand. You can bet the bank that
    if it was an American car it would've been on the front page of every
    newspaper.
     
    NJ Vike, Nov 21, 2006
    #15
  16. NJ Vike

    NJ Vike Guest

    You're right about that. I have had several Expeditions in the past and each
    new one you will notice, other than the engine, that the interior materials
    are garbage. In addition to that, the stereo is not as good as the MACH.
    They also removed those nice lights that were on the running boards and now
    gave us "puddle lamps" which doesn't help the people getting in and out of
    the rear of the vehicle.

    Then they wonder why they don't sell. Sheez.
     
    NJ Vike, Nov 21, 2006
    #16
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.