3.2 and 3.5L interference engines

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Geoff, Nov 25, 2003.

  1. Geoff

    Geoff Guest

    What engine do you have? The 3.2 and 3.5L engines are belt-timed, have
    an AUTOMATIC tensioner, and (although there are conflicting sources) I
    believe they are NON-interference engines.

    I was just reading the FSM for my '98 3.2L prepping to replace an idler
    pulley. In big, bold capital letters it states that the 3.2/3.5L are 'not
    freewheeling engine designs' and warns against rotating the cams/crank with
    the timing belt removed.

    --Geoff
     
    Geoff, Nov 25, 2003
    #1
  2. Geoff

    James Linn Guest

    Well my 3.5 from a 97 is definitely not an interference engine.

    When I bought it at 108k Kames, I replaced a worn belt. At 150k kms, the
    tensioner went and the belt broke. I was back in business after a tow and
    couple of hours labour.

    I've owned one car with a timing chain and interference engine -the
    tensioner was recalled but I bought it used - never got the notice and of
    course it wore down to the point where the chain went - new engine time.

    James Linn
     
    James Linn, Nov 25, 2003
    #2
  3. Geoff

    Steve Guest

    That is pretty definitive, I'd never heard that quoted before. Glad
    mine's a first-generation engine.
     
    Steve, Nov 25, 2003
    #3
  4. Please see the following:

    http://www.gates.com/brochure.cfm?brochure=981&location_id=540

    According to this only the 98-99 in this configuration are interference, the
    other years
    are not.

    Ted
     
    Ted Mittelstaedt, Nov 26, 2003
    #4
  5. Geoff

    Tom Showers Guest

    Starting in 1998, the 3.2 and 3.5 are NOT freewheeling due to cylinder
    head changes made mainly for emissions reasons. 1997 and earlier (3.5 only)
    is freewheeling.


    --
    Tom Showers
    Gold Certified Chrysler Technician
    ASE CMAT, L1
    Sawyer Motors
    Saugerties, NY
     
    Tom Showers, Nov 27, 2003
    #5
  6. Geoff

    hmmm... Guest

    Not to mention all the money to be made rebuilding trashed engines.
     
    hmmm..., Nov 27, 2003
    #6
  7. Geoff

    Geoff Guest

    Tom,
    You seen any of the 3.2Ls come in with snapped timing belts? At what
    mileage do they seem to give out?

    --Geoff
     
    Geoff, Dec 1, 2003
    #7
  8. Geoff

    Big Boy ES Guest

    I had mine go on Sunday on my 3.2 ES ~30 000 Mile ( 48 000 Kms). The blasted
    thing was hard to start, idled at around 200 rpm and I am like "This aint
    right". Shut it down, gave it a few seconds and tried to restart it. No go, It
    would splutter and cough but refused to turn over.

    Had it towed to the Dealer today, and they're like "Here you go, The belt is
    cracked in 6 places, and there are huge holes in the main Serpentine belt.
    C$100.00 later I'm fighting them because this should have been caught at the 25
    000 mile service, when they did a huge service under the hood. Clerks like a
    Deer in the Headlights "ahhh not my job". Did a quote on a new 3.2 should this
    one have had some hot Steamy Valve on Piston action and they gave me a quote of
    C$17 000 to drop one in.
     
    Big Boy ES, Dec 2, 2003
    #8
  9. How do you know the belt was bad 5,000 miles ago? Did you inspect it
    yourself? As the owner off the car, it is your job to keep it in good
    condition.


    Matt
     
    Matthew S. Whiting, Dec 2, 2003
    #9
  10. Geoff

    Art Begun Guest

    Should not go at 30k miles and if it does should be covered by
    warranty.
     
    Art Begun, Dec 3, 2003
    #10
  11. Geoff

    Big Boy ES Guest

    Yes as the owner of the car I take great pride in looking after the car. My argument
    is that the belt shouldn't have snapped at so low a mileage, and maybe the dealer
    should have been more careful at inspecting it and finding a defect.

    I inspect the Tire pressures, fluids and belts maybe once every two weeks when its
    wash time. I pay more attention to these things when the Winter Tires go on, because
    you do not need to be stranded at -30

    I don't pull the main timing belt off the car every week to inspect it either.
    That's what i trust the dealer to do. A quick visible inspection is all I can do with
    a flashlight. My argument is this, at 25 000 the car went in for an inspection where
    they were supposed to look at these things. Now in 5 000 miles, the belt has fallen
    to pieces, caused the ASR's to shut the engine down, and caused me to jack the wife's
    97 Intrepid

    I am not in the habit of 4 wheeling over medians or grass embankments, or cranking
    the engine to 6500 rpm in each gear. This is a car that is driven 90 % of the time
    with the autostick and shifted at 2000 rpm until the engine is warm. At that point it
    won't see 3000 rpm for shifts.

    My Shelby Lancer ( 89k and change) on the other hand still has the original belts
    (Different era / Quality). I've been through several head gaskets but that's another
    story.

    From the Service manual

    24 months or 22500 miles ( I delayed to 25 000)
    -change oil and Filter (converted over to Synthetic 5w30)
    -Check all Levels
    -belts and hoses *****Oops*****
    -56 point inspection
    -tire rotation
    yada yada yada
     
    Big Boy ES, Dec 3, 2003
    #11
  12. Geoff

    Big Boy ES Guest

    No warranty on it surprise surprise. But cause a big enough stink at the
    regional DasFuehrerChrysler office and Labor and Towing magically
    disappear from the bill. ;-)
     
    Big Boy ES, Dec 3, 2003
    #12
  13. Geoff

    Steve Guest

    And that's exactly what the dealer should do, because you don't REMOVE a
    timing belt to simply inspect it at 1/4 of its expected lifespan.
    That's not good maintenance practice because if you did enough
    disassembly to R&R the belt for inspection, you might as well put a new
    one on.
    There's no way on earth that the timing belt should be failing at 35k
    miles, unless there was some incident that damaged the belt (and didn't
    you say that the serpentine belt was *also* damaged?). If it was a
    single damaging incident, there's no reason to think that the dealer's
    25,000 mile inspection would have found anything because there was
    probably nothing to find at that time.

    Still trying to think of what sort of incident could damage both
    belts... thats an odd one, since the timing belt is enclosed and the
    serpentine belt is exposed.
     
    Steve, Dec 3, 2003
    #13
  14. Geoff

    Art Begun Guest

    I assme engine ok and you are just paying for the belt?
     
    Art Begun, Dec 4, 2003
    #14
  15. Geoff

    Big Boy ES Guest

    No sign of damage (knocking on wood for that one). The car seems to have
    more perk, and fuel economy has improved significantly.

    DasfuhrerChrysler waived the costs of the timing belt. I had to pay for
    the accessories serpentine belt, as the damage was deemed to be caused by
    "Road Debris". So $31.00 later, and infamy at the dealership and
    "friendly" regional office, i am back on the road.
     
    Big Boy ES, Dec 7, 2003
    #15
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.